Reliable workflow for building or fixing UI so results look intentional, not generic. Use for any frontend/UI task — new screen, component, redesign, "make it look better", layout, styling, or when the user says UI is the pain point.
Scanned 9/22/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CodeWithJuber/forgekit --skill ui-workflow --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ui Workflow?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/codewithjuber-ui-workflow)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ui-workflow
description: Reliable workflow for building or fixing UI so results look intentional, not generic. Use for any frontend/UI task — new screen, component, redesign, "make it look better", layout, styling, or when the user says UI is the pain point.
---
# UI workflow
UI is unreliable when taste is vague and there's no check. Fix both: lock ONE
visual direction, build on the project's real components, then verify with the
deterministic design gate and a screenshot instead of guessing.
## 0. Pick ONE direction — don't stack taste sources
Competing taste/design skills produce muddy, inconsistent output. Per project,
choose **one** source of visual truth: the repo's `DESIGN.md` (create it with
`forge taste <style>` or the `design-md` tool), or a reference URL/screenshot
from the user. If none exists, ask.
## 1. Ground the components (current APIs, not memory)
- Reuse the project's existing components and design tokens first —
`forge atlas query <Component>` finds them.
- Confirm any library's props/API against current docs, not recall; vet new
dependencies with `tech-selector`.
## 2. Build
- Match the project's stack and component system over bespoke CSS.
- Accessibility is not optional: labels, focus states, contrast, keyboard nav.
## 3. Verify (the step that makes UI reliable)
- **Deterministic gate first:** `forge uicheck design <files> --taste <style>`
(exit 1 on fail) — slop distance to generic templates must stay HIGH,
conformance to the project's minted fingerprint must stay LOW, spacing/radius/
shadow on scale. Failures are per-feature edits, not a score. If the repo has
no fingerprint yet, mint one from approved UI:
`forge uicheck fingerprint <files> --mint`.
- `forge uicheck contrast <fg> <bg>` for exact WCAG math — never eyeball it.
- **Then screenshot:** render at desktop AND mobile widths, compare against the
reference/DESIGN.md, list concrete differences (spacing, hierarchy, color,
alignment) and fix. For a second opinion, hand the screenshot + reference to
the `frontend-verifier` subagent.
## Done =
Passes `forge uicheck design`, matches the reference at both breakpoints, passes
accessibility checks, uses the project's tokens/components, and you've shown the
final screenshot as evidence.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!