Pull current, real-world software-dev signal on demand from GitHub trending, Reddit, research papers, and blogs — filtered to the user's stack, hype-filtered, with verified sources. Use when the user asks "what's new/trending", "latest in <tech>", "should I adopt X", or wants a dev digest. Coding topics only.
Scanned 9/22/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CodeWithJuber/forgekit --skill dev-radar --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Dev Radar?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/codewithjuber-dev-radar)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: dev-radar
description: Pull current, real-world software-dev signal on demand from GitHub trending, Reddit, research papers, and blogs — filtered to the user's stack, hype-filtered, with verified sources. Use when the user asks "what's new/trending", "latest in <tech>", "should I adopt X", or wants a dev digest. Coding topics only.
disable-model-invocation: true
---
# Dev radar
On-demand scan of what's actually happening in software dev right now — not
training-data recall. Signal over noise, coding topics only.
## Sources (fetch live each run)
- **GitHub trending** — [https://github.com/trending?since=daily](https://github.com/trending?since=daily) | weekly | monthly
(add `&spoken_language_code=` / language filters). Best for real traction.
Cross-check a repo's health before recommending (last commit, releases, issues,
license) — trending ≠ maintained.
- **Reddit** (via WebSearch / old.reddit JSON) — r/programming, r/webdev,
r/ExperiencedDevs, r/nextjs, r/node, r/LocalLLaMA, r/MachineLearning. Read the
top comments, not just the headline — Reddit's value is the critique.
- **Papers** — arXiv (cs.SE, cs.AI), Hugging Face papers (HF MCP), Context7 for
library docs. Use for AI/ML and algorithmic topics.
- **Blogs** — WebSearch for Medium/eng-blog posts; treat as opinion, verify claims.
## Method
1. Scope to the user's stack unless they widen it: Next.js/React, Node, Postgres +
pgvector, TypeScript, Python, LLM/agent tooling. Ignore unrelated trends.
2. Gather from 2-3 sources in parallel; dedupe.
3. **Hype filter** — drop "X is dead" / "just switch to Y" posts unless there's
real evidence (adoption, benchmarks, maintainer signal). Note the counter-view.
4. For anything actionable, hand it to `tech-selector` before recommending adoption.
## Output (dated)
A short digest: **What's moving** (3-6 items: repo/paper/thread · one line · link ·
why it matters to your stack) → **Worth a real look** (1-2, with the trade-off) →
**Skip / hype** (things being overhyped, and why). Every claim links its source and
states the date. End with: which items (if any) warrant a `tech-selector` pass.
## Guardrails
- Software/coding only — no general news.
- Cite sources; never assert currency from memory. If a source didn't load, say so.
- Trending is a starting signal, not a recommendation. Adoption still needs the
fit/maintenance/license check.
## Optional: recurring digest
For a weekly cadence, the user can wire a scheduled run (`claude -p "/dev-radar weekly, my stack"`) via cron or their scheduler, output appended to a notes file.Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!