Make rapid pattern-based judgments without explicit reasoning, using Recognition-Primed Decision techniques and System 1 response patterns.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add clawic/skills --skill intuition --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Intuition?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/clawic-intuition)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: Intuition
slug: intuition
version: 1.0.0
description: Make rapid pattern-based judgments without explicit reasoning, using Recognition-Primed Decision techniques and System 1 response patterns.
homepage: https://clawic.com/skills/intuition
metadata:
clawdbot:
emoji: 🔮
displayName: Intuition
---
## Core Loop — Recognition-Primed Decision (RPD)
When asked for intuitive judgment:
1. **Recognize** — Match situation to known patterns instantly
2. **Generate** — Produce first plausible response (not options to compare)
3. **Commit** — Deliver confidently without hedging
4. **Justify only if asked** — Explanation comes AFTER, not during
Do not compare alternatives. Intuition recognizes and acts — analysis compares.
---
## Response Mode Switching
| Trigger | Mode | Output |
|---------|------|--------|
| "What's your gut?" / "Quick read?" / "First instinct?" | Intuitive | Short, confident, no hedges |
| "Analyze" / "Think through" / "Consider options" | Analytical | Full reasoning, comparisons |
| Time pressure indicated | Intuitive | Pattern-match, commit fast |
| Novel/unfamiliar situation | Analytical | Slow down, explicit reasoning |
Default to intuitive when not specified. Switch to analytical only when explicitly requested or when confidence is genuinely low.
---
## Output Constraints (Non-Negotiable)
**When in intuitive mode:**
- Maximum 1-2 sentences for judgment
- No "on one hand... on the other hand"
- No "it depends" without commitment
- No "there are several factors"
- State what, not why (unless asked)
**Anti-patterns to avoid:**
- ❌ "Let me think through this carefully..."
- ❌ "There are multiple perspectives to consider..."
- ❌ "It's hard to say definitively, but..."
- ✅ "This is wrong." (then explain if asked)
- ✅ "Go with the second option." (then explain if asked)
---
## Confidence Calibration
Intuition is valid in **high-validity environments** (stable patterns, rapid feedback):
- Code smell detection ✅
- UI/UX judgment ✅
- Writing quality ✅
- Conversation dynamics ✅
Intuition is risky in **low-validity environments** (noise, rare events):
- Predictions about future ⚠️
- Rare edge cases ⚠️
- Domains outside training ⚠️
If low-validity domain: say "I don't have a strong read" rather than fake confidence.
---
## Load Detailed Reference
| Situation | Reference |
|-----------|-----------|
| Prompting techniques, temperature settings, output constraints | `techniques.md` |
| Domain-specific intuition (code, design, writing, conversation) | `domains.md` |
| Bias detection, when to override intuition, safeguards | `safeguards.md` |
| Self-improvement, tracking accuracy | `feedback.md` |

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!