Storage-engine and database-internals architecture: B-tree vs LSM-tree, write- ahead logging, buffer/page cache, MVCC and concurrency control, durability/fsync, and compaction. Architect-level engine selection and data-path design. USE WHEN: designing or choosing a storage engine, "B-tree vs LSM", "WAL", "buffer pool", "MVCC", "compaction", "write amplification", "fsync/durability", embedded KV store, database internals, read/write-optimized store choice. DO NOT USE FOR: SQL query writing/O...
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add claude-dev-suite/claude-dev-suite --skill storage-engines --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Storage Engines?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/claude-dev-suite-storage-engines)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: storage-engines
description: |
Storage-engine and database-internals architecture: B-tree vs LSM-tree, write-
ahead logging, buffer/page cache, MVCC and concurrency control, durability/fsync,
and compaction. Architect-level engine selection and data-path design.
USE WHEN: designing or choosing a storage engine, "B-tree vs LSM", "WAL",
"buffer pool", "MVCC", "compaction", "write amplification", "fsync/durability",
embedded KV store, database internals, read/write-optimized store choice.
DO NOT USE FOR: SQL query writing/ORM (use database/orm skills); data pipelines
(use `data-intensive`); vector indexes (use vector-stores skills).
allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob
---
# Storage-Engine Internals
## B-tree vs LSM-tree — the defining choice
| | **B-tree** (InnoDB, Postgres) | **LSM-tree** (RocksDB, Cassandra) |
|---|---|---|
| Writes | In-place; random I/O; write-amp from page writes | Sequential (memtable→SST); high throughput |
| Reads | 1 path, predictable | May touch many levels → read-amp (mitigate w/ bloom filters) |
| Space | Fragmentation | Space-amp until compaction |
| Best for | Read-heavy, range scans, point lookups | Write-heavy ingest, SSD-friendly |
The three amplifications (**write / read / space**) trade off against each other —
state which one the workload can least afford.
## Durability & the write path
- **WAL**: append before applying; `fsync`/`fdatasync` policy = the
durability ↔ throughput knob (group commit amortizes fsync). `O_DIRECT` vs
page cache; `fsync` correctness (don't trust it lying — the "fsync-gate").
- **Buffer/page cache**: hit ratio drives everything; eviction (LRU/CLOCK),
dirty-page writeback, checkpointing to bound recovery time.
- **Crash recovery**: redo/undo, ARIES, checkpoints; recovery time vs steady-state.
## Concurrency control
- **MVCC** (snapshot reads, no read locks) vs 2PL (locking) vs OCC (validate at
commit). MVCC needs version GC/vacuum (Postgres bloat).
- Isolation levels and their anomalies; SSI for serializable without heavy locks.
## When to recommend what
- Write-heavy ingest / time-series / SSD → LSM (RocksDB/Cassandra/ScyllaDB).
- Read-heavy, rich queries, range scans → B-tree (Postgres/InnoDB).
- Embedded/edge KV → LMDB (B-tree, mmap) or RocksDB (LSM) by read/write mix.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!