Building knowledge graphs from unstructured text. LLM-based triple extraction (subject-predicate-object), schema-guided extraction via Pydantic + structured output, REBEL model, OpenIE, entity linking to Wikidata/DBpedia, validation with LLM judges, incremental KG updates, and exporting to Neo4j / Amazon Neptune / TigerGraph. Full pipeline. USE WHEN: user mentions "knowledge graph construction", "KG construction", "triple extraction", "OpenIE", "REBEL", "Pydantic triples", "entity linking Wi...
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add claude-dev-suite/claude-dev-suite --skill knowledge-graph-construction --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Knowledge Graph Construction?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/claude-dev-suite-knowledge-graph-construction)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: knowledge-graph-construction
description: |
Building knowledge graphs from unstructured text. LLM-based triple
extraction (subject-predicate-object), schema-guided extraction via
Pydantic + structured output, REBEL model, OpenIE, entity linking to
Wikidata/DBpedia, validation with LLM judges, incremental KG updates,
and exporting to Neo4j / Amazon Neptune / TigerGraph. Full pipeline.
USE WHEN: user mentions "knowledge graph construction", "KG construction",
"triple extraction", "OpenIE", "REBEL", "Pydantic triples",
"entity linking Wikidata", "build knowledge graph", "extract triples"
DO NOT USE FOR: graph RAG retrieval - use `graph-rag`;
deduping/canonicalizing entities - use `entity-resolution`;
ontology-aware retrieval - use `ontology-guided-retrieval`
allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Write, Edit
---
# Knowledge Graph Construction
Turning unstructured documents into a queryable graph has four stages: extract, link, validate, load. Skip any one and you get a graph that's either empty, hallucinated, inconsistent, or unusable.
## Pipeline Overview
```
chunks → extract (entities + triples) → link (canonical IDs / KB entries)
→ validate (schema, LLM judge) → load (Neo4j / Neptune / TigerGraph)
→ incremental updates on new ingests
```
## Schema First
Define the ontology up front. Free-form extraction produces noise ("rel": "is_related_to") that kills downstream querying.
```python
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
from typing import Literal
EntityType = Literal["Person", "Organization", "Product", "Location", "Incident", "Document"]
RelationType = Literal[
"WORKS_AT", "FOUNDED", "HEADQUARTERED_IN", "PRODUCED_BY",
"CAUSED", "MENTIONED_IN", "REPORTS_TO", "ACQUIRED",
]
class Entity(BaseModel):
name: str = Field(..., description="Canonical name as it appears in text")
type: EntityType
description: str = Field("", description="1-line grounded description")
class Triple(BaseModel):
subject: str
predicate: RelationType
object: str
evidence: str = Field(..., description="Exact quote from the source")
class Extraction(BaseModel):
entities: list[Entity]
triples: list[Triple]
```
Every relation type should have a clear, narrow intent; prefer many specific types over a few broad ones.
## LLM-Based Extraction (Structured Output)
### Anthropic tools API
```python
import anthropic, json
client = anthropic.Anthropic()
tool = {
"name": "emit_extraction",
"description": "Return the extraction.",
"input_schema": Extraction.model_json_schema(),
}
PROMPT = """Extract entities and triples from the text.
Rules:
- Use only the schema types in the tool.
- Only extract facts EXPLICITLY stated in the text.
- Normalize names (no pronouns, no possessives).
- `evidence` must be a verbatim quote.
Text:
{chunk}"""
def extract(chunk: str) -> Extraction:
msg = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5",
max_tokens=4000,
tools=[tool],
tool_choice={"type": "tool", "name": "emit_extraction"},
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": PROMPT.format(chunk=chunk)}],
)
for block in msg.content:
if block.type == "tool_use":
return Extraction.model_validate(block.input)
raise RuntimeError("no extraction returned")
```
### OpenAI structured outputs
```python
from openai import OpenAI
oai = OpenAI()
resp = oai.beta.chat.completions.parse(
model="gpt-4o",
response_format=Extraction,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": PROMPT.format(chunk=chunk)}],
)
extraction: Extraction = resp.choices[0].message.parsed
```
### Costs
- Use a cheaper model for extraction (`claude-haiku-4-5`, `gpt-4o-mini`) on high-volume ingestion.
- Batch the call with the OpenAI/Anthropic batch APIs for 50% discount on large corpora.
- Cache by `sha256(chunk + model_version + schema_version)` — re-run only on schema changes.
## REBEL (Encoder-Decoder Model)
REBEL is a seq-to-seq model fine-tuned to produce triples directly; no prompt engineering, no API cost.
```python
# pip install transformers sentencepiece
from transformers import pipeline
pipe = pipeline("text2text-generation", model="Babelscape/rebel-large", device=0)
out = pipe("Barack Obama was born in Honolulu and served as the 44th US president.",
return_tensors=False, return_text=True, max_length=256)[0]["generated_text"]
# Parser for REBEL output format
def parse_rebel(raw: str) -> list[tuple[str, str, str]]:
triples, subject, relation, obj, state = [], "", "", "", "x"
for tok in raw.replace("<s>","").replace("<pad>","").replace("</s>","").split():
if tok == "<triplet>":
if subject and obj: triples.append((subject.strip(), relation.strip(), obj.strip()))
state, subject, relation, obj = "t", "", "", ""
elif tok == "<subj>":
state = "s"
elif tok == "<obj>":
state = "o"
else:
if state == "t": subject += " " + tok
if state == "s": obj += " " + tok
if state == "o": relation += " " + tok
if subject and obj: triples.append((subject.strip(), relation.strip(), obj.strip()))
return triples
```
Use REBEL when: cost matters more than schema control (REBEL produces free-form relations; map to your schema with a rule table).
## OpenIE (Stanford CoreNLP, OpenIE6)
Rule-based open information extraction produces high-recall but noisy triples. Pair with a downstream LLM filter to prune low-quality ones. Useful for multilingual corpora lacking strong instruction-tuned models.
## Entity Linking to Wikidata / DBpedia
Raw surface forms aren't identifiers. Link each extracted entity to an external KB ID where possible so cross-document merges are trivial.
```python
import requests
def wikidata_search(name: str, lang="en", limit=5):
r = requests.get("https://www.wikidata.org/w/api.php", params={
"action": "wbsearchentities", "search": name, "language": lang,
"format": "json", "limit": limit,
}, timeout=5)
return [(h["id"], h.get("description", "")) for h in r.json().get("search", [])]
# wikidata_search("Anthropic")
# [('Q110760624', 'American artificial intelligence safety and research company'), ...]
```
For ambiguous names, pass candidates to an LLM with surrounding context and let it pick the right QID. Cache the linking decision per `(name, context_hash)`.
Alternatives: [BLINK](https://github.com/facebookresearch/BLINK), [GENRE](https://github.com/facebookresearch/GENRE), spaCy's `entity_linker` pipe with a custom KB.
## Validation
Never load unvalidated triples. Three layers:
### 1. Schema validation (Pydantic already does this)
### 2. Evidence-grounded check
```python
def grounded(triple: Triple, chunk: str) -> bool:
return triple.evidence.lower() in chunk.lower() \
and triple.subject.lower() in triple.evidence.lower() \
and triple.object.lower() in triple.evidence.lower()
```
### 3. LLM judge (spot-check + reject)
```python
JUDGE_PROMPT = """Does the evidence support the triple? Reply JSON:
{{"supported": true|false, "confidence": 0.0-1.0}}
Triple: ({s}, {p}, {o})
Evidence: {e}"""
def judge(t: Triple) -> dict:
msg = client.messages.create(model="claude-haiku-4-5", max_tokens=150,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": JUDGE_PROMPT.format(
s=t.subject, p=t.predicate, o=t.object, e=t.evidence)}])
return json.loads(msg.content[0].text)
```
Run the judge on a 10% sample; alert if `supported` drops below 90%.
## Provenance
Every triple carries source metadata — essential for citations and for fixing bad extractions later.
```python
record = {
"triple": (t.subject, t.predicate, t.object),
"evidence": t.evidence,
"source_doc_id": doc_id,
"source_chunk_id": chunk_id,
"source_offset": chunk_offset,
"extractor": "claude-sonnet-4-5",
"schema_version": "v3",
"extracted_at": iso_now(),
}
```
## Loading to Graph Stores
### Neo4j
```python
from neo4j import GraphDatabase
driver = GraphDatabase.driver("bolt://localhost:7687", auth=("neo4j", "pass"))
CYPHER = """
UNWIND $rows AS row
MERGE (s:Entity {canonical_id: row.s_id})
ON CREATE SET s.name = row.s_name, s.type = row.s_type
MERGE (o:Entity {canonical_id: row.o_id})
ON CREATE SET o.name = row.o_name, o.type = row.o_type
MERGE (s)-[r:REL {type: row.predicate}]->(o)
SET r.evidence = row.evidence,
r.source_chunk_id = row.source_chunk_id,
r.extracted_at = datetime(row.extracted_at)
"""
def load(rows: list[dict]):
with driver.session() as s:
for i in range(0, len(rows), 500):
s.run(CYPHER, rows=rows[i:i+500])
```
Create constraints first:
```cypher
CREATE CONSTRAINT entity_id IF NOT EXISTS FOR (e:Entity) REQUIRE e.canonical_id IS UNIQUE;
CREATE INDEX entity_name IF NOT EXISTS FOR (e:Entity) ON (e.name);
```
### Amazon Neptune
Use Gremlin or openCypher. Bulk-load via CSV to S3 → `neptune-loader`. Same shape; predicates become edge labels.
### TigerGraph
Define `VERTEX` and `EDGE` types in GSQL. Bulk-load with `LOADING JOB`. Strongest for >100M edge graphs.
### Incremental Updates
On new ingest: extract → link → validate → diff against existing triples (keyed by `(s, p, o)`), insert new, update evidence on existing. Never delete — mark superseded for lineage.
```sql
CREATE TABLE triple_log (
s_id TEXT, predicate TEXT, o_id TEXT,
evidence TEXT,
source_chunk_id TEXT,
extracted_at TIMESTAMPTZ,
superseded_at TIMESTAMPTZ
);
CREATE INDEX ON triple_log (s_id, predicate, o_id);
```
## Full Pipeline Skeleton
```python
def build_kg(chunks: list[dict]):
all_rows = []
for chunk in chunks:
extraction = extract(chunk["text"])
ents = [link_entity(e) for e in extraction.entities]
for t in extraction.triples:
if not grounded(t, chunk["text"]):
continue
s_id = ent_id_by_name[t.subject]
o_id = ent_id_by_name[t.object]
all_rows.append({
"s_id": s_id, "s_name": t.subject, "s_type": ...,
"o_id": o_id, "o_name": t.object, "o_type": ...,
"predicate": t.predicate,
"evidence": t.evidence,
"source_chunk_id": chunk["id"],
"extracted_at": iso_now(),
})
load(all_rows)
```
## Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Fix |
|---|---|
| Open-ended extraction (no schema) | Schema-guided via Pydantic + structured outputs |
| Accepting triples without evidence | Require `evidence` field + grounding check |
| Using `gpt-4o` / `claude-opus` for every chunk | Haiku/mini for bulk; Opus for hard cases |
| Extracting entities but not linking to canonical IDs | Wikidata link + internal `entity-resolution` step |
| Full graph rebuild on every ingest | Incremental triple insert, keyed on `(s, p, o)` |
| Dropping provenance to "save space" | Provenance is the citation layer — keep it |
| Loading without constraints | Define uniqueness on `canonical_id` first |
## Production Checklist
- [ ] Schema (entities + relations) in Pydantic, version-tagged
- [ ] Extraction cached by `sha256(chunk + model + schema_version)`
- [ ] Grounding check (evidence quote in chunk) enforced
- [ ] LLM judge sample (10%) with alert on quality regression
- [ ] Entity linking to canonical ID (internal or Wikidata)
- [ ] Provenance fields on every triple (source, offset, extractor, time)
- [ ] Graph constraints + indexes created before bulk load
- [ ] Batch load (500–1000 rows per transaction)
- [ ] Incremental updates on ingest, no full rebuilds
- [ ] Eval corpus with gold triples for regression testing
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!