Skip to content
Back to skills

Pipeline Conductor

ASecurity

Chains the four core FH verification pipelines (harvest-loop → steel-quench → phantom-quench → sim-conductor) into a single gated sweep. Accepts a scope (single skill, specific asset, full harness) and aggregates results into one structured report. Supports --quick mode (steps 2+3 only) and --full mode (all four steps). Triggered by "run the full pipeline", "chain all verifications", "end-to-end sweep", "pipeline-conductor", or "verify everything".

  • 16 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 19, 2026
ai-agentsgobashgit

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 19, 2026

npx -y skills add chrono-meta/forge-harness --skill pipeline-conductor --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Pipeline Conductor?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Pipeline Conductor
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/chrono-meta-pipeline-conductor/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/chrono-meta-pipeline-conductor)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: pipeline-conductor
description: Chains the four core FH verification pipelines (harvest-loop → steel-quench → phantom-quench → sim-conductor) into a single gated sweep. Accepts a scope (single skill, specific asset, full harness) and aggregates results into one structured report. Supports --quick mode (steps 2+3 only) and --full mode (all four steps). Triggered by "run the full pipeline", "chain all verifications", "end-to-end sweep", "pipeline-conductor", or "verify everything".
user-invocable: true
allowed-tools: ["Read", "Write", "Bash", "Grep", "Glob", "Agent"]
model: sonnet
---

# pipeline-conductor — Chained Verification Sweep

Chains the four standalone FH verification pipelines into a gated sequence. Each step receives the previous step's verdict before proceeding. Aggregates all findings into a single structured report at the end.

The gap this closes: harvest-loop, steel-quench, phantom-quench, and sim-conductor are each invocable independently but have no automatic hand-off between them. Running them sequentially by hand loses inter-step signal — a FAIL in step 2 should block step 3 rather than silently continuing. pipeline-conductor enforces that ordering.

## Triggers

- `/pipeline-conductor`
- "Run the full verification pipeline", "chain all four verifications"
- "End-to-end sweep before I push", "verify everything at once"
- "I want to run all the checks in order", "do a full harness review"
- "Run quench then grounding then sim", "chain the pipelines"
- "Full pipeline on this skill", "sweep this asset before release"

> **Disambiguation**: "run the pipeline" alone may trigger harvest-loop (which uses identical phrasing). Prefer "run pipeline-conductor" or "chain all verifications" for unambiguous activation.

## Modes

| Flag | Steps run | When to use |
|---|---|---|
| `--full` (default) | Steps 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 | Complete verification sweep |
| `--quick` | Steps 2 → 3 only | Fast adversarial + phantom check; skip knowledge loop and simulation |
| `--no-sim` | Steps 1 → 2 → 3 | Skip sim-conductor (e.g., no sim environment available) |

**Mode qualifier on verdicts**: `CLEAN (--quick)` and `CLEAN (--no-sim)` do not qualify as pre-release gates. Only `CLEAN (--full)` is sufficient for external publish or PR approval.

## Verdict Format

Every step emits exactly one verdict line before handing control to the next step:

```
Verdict: PASS | CONDITIONAL_PASS | FAIL | ESCALATE
Basis:   [one-line summary of deciding factor]
```

| Verdict | Meaning | Chain behavior |
|---|---|---|
| `PASS` | Step complete, no blocking issues | Proceed to next step |
| `CONDITIONAL_PASS` | Issues found but none are blockers; must be resolved before final report | Capture items, proceed to next step; flag in final report |
| `FAIL` | Blocking issue found | Halt chain, surface to user immediately |
| `ESCALATE` | Ambiguous state requiring human judgment | Pause chain, present three options to user |

`CONDITIONAL_PASS` means proceed, not skip — captured items accumulate into the final report's Pending section and must be addressed before the sweep is considered clean. `FAIL` halts the chain (user decides fix-and-resume or abandon). `ESCALATE` pauses the chain pending the user's choice.

### ESCALATE Handling

When any step returns `ESCALATE`, present:

> "Step N returned ESCALATE: [basis]. Choose:
> (a) Make a decision — state your judgment and I will incorporate it and continue the chain.
> (b) Accept and continue — mark this as PENDING in the report and proceed to the next step.
> (c) Abort — close the sweep as BLOCKED."

- Option (a): User provides judgment → incorporate as resolution note → re-evaluate step gate with decision context → continue chain.
- Option (b): Mark ESCALATE item as PENDING → continue chain from step N+1.
- Option (c): Halt, output BLOCKED report with ESCALATE item in blocking section.

---

## Step 0. Scope, Mode, and Translation

Determine before running any pipeline step:

1. **Scope**: single skill (path to `SKILL.md`) · specific asset (file/directory) · full harness (`plugins/` + `templates/`)
2. **Mode**: `--quick`, `--no-sim`, or `--full` (default)
3. **Branch**: current git branch (used for regression guard and report header)

If scope is not specified, ask: *"What should I sweep? (e.g., a specific skill path, a directory, or the full harness)"* **Do not infer scope** — a wrong scope produces misleading verdicts.

Output the sweep plan and get Y/N confirmation before running.

> **Detail**: See `SKILL_detail.md §Output-Formats` — sweep plan block, per-step verdict blocks, aggregated report template — read when emitting any step output.

### Scope Translation Table

The four constituent skills use heterogeneous scope models. Translate the pipeline scope to each skill's invocation form before running any step:

| Pipeline scope | harvest-loop (Step 1) | steel-quench (Step 2) | phantom-quench (Step 3) | sim-conductor (Step 4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single SKILL.md | Check session findings relevant to this skill; propose mode only | Adversarial attack on this SKILL.md | Back-trace claims in this SKILL.md to declared sources | Area D (artifact review) on this SKILL.md |
| Specific directory | Check session findings in this domain | Attack all SKILL.md files in directory | Back-trace all claims in directory | Area A + Area D on the domain |
| Full harness | Check all recent session findings | Attack all harness assets under scope | Back-trace all claims across harness | Area A + Area B + Area D |

---

## Step 0.5. return-path-gate — Pre-flight Chain Audit

> Skip only when scope is a single non-pipeline skill. **return-path-gate not installed is a recorded
> degrade, never a free skip**: proceed, but record `degraded: return-path-gate (not installed)` in the
> final report — and, symmetric with the user-override row below, the sweep **cannot reach
> `CLEAN (--full)`**. A missing tool must not pass more cheaply than an explicit refusal (that
> asymmetry trains uninstalling the gate).

Run `/return-path-gate --skill [scope]`.

| return-path-gate result | Step 0.5 verdict | Chain behavior |
|---|---|---|
| 0 OPEN chains | `PASS` | Proceed |
| MEDIUM/LOW severity OPEN chains only | `CONDITIONAL_PASS` | Proceed; capture in Pending |
| 1+ HIGH severity OPEN chains | `FAIL` | **Halt sweep** — fix chains before running pipeline |

**Skip override rule**: `S` (skip on FAIL) is available but must be declared explicitly. Skipping records as `degraded: return-path-gate (user override)` in the final report and the sweep **cannot reach `CLEAN (--full)` status** regardless of subsequent step verdicts.

---

## Step 1. harvest-loop — Knowledge Loop Check

> Skipped in `--quick` mode.

Check for harvest-loop signals in the current session — read session context rather than invoking harvest-loop directly (a mid-sweep invocation would conflict with the sweep's own pattern collection).

**Typed-first parsing (codex M3 2026-08-10)**: if a harvest-loop output block exists, classify
ONLY from its final non-empty `Verdict:` line; absent/malformed → `ESCALATE`. The prose rows below
apply ONLY to pre-contract historical runs (no typed line anywhere in the output).

| harvest-loop result | pipeline-conductor verdict |
|---|---|
| Typed `Verdict: PASS` | `PASS` |
| Typed `Verdict: CONDITIONAL_PASS` | `CONDITIONAL_PASS` (carry the attached skip-list into the report) |
| Typed `Verdict: FAIL` | `FAIL` |
| Typed `Verdict: ESCALATE` | `ESCALATE` (own handling — never collapsed into FAIL) |
| (legacy, no typed line) all steps pass prose | `PASS` |
| (legacy, no typed line) patterns found but no blockers | `CONDITIONAL_PASS` — capture pattern list |
| (legacy, no typed line) drift/failure prose | `FAIL` |
| Did not run this session | `CONDITIONAL_PASS` — note: knowledge loop not validated |
| Auto-skipped (< 3 patterns) | `CONDITIONAL_PASS` — note: sub-threshold, not validated |

> **Detail**: See `SKILL_detail.md §Execution-Notes` — harvest-loop invocation path, per-step FAIL prompts, Area B cadence bash, what-each-step-checks reference — read when executing Steps 1–4.

---

## Step 2. steel-quench — Adversarial Verification

Run steel-quench against the target scope (for `--quick`, this is the first step).

**steel-quench severity vocabulary** (S/A/B grade — not M/S/R):
- **S-grade**: Immediate blocker — must fix before proceeding
- **A-grade**: Required before deployment — fix before external release
- **B-grade**: Improvement recommended — non-blocking

| steel-quench result | pipeline-conductor verdict |
|---|---|
| 0 S-grade findings | `PASS` |
| A-grade or B-grade findings only | `CONDITIONAL_PASS` — capture finding list |
| 1+ S-grade findings | `FAIL` |
| Wave 4 (Meta-Aware Adversary) surfaces structural ambiguity | `ESCALATE` |

---

## Step 3. phantom-quench — Phantom Claim Detection

Run phantom-quench scoped to the same target as Steps 1 and 2.

**Load-bearing Phantom** (binary test — apply mechanically). A Phantom is load-bearing if it appears in any of:
- `§Done When` section of the skill under audit
- Any numbered `§Step N` execution body
- `§Chains` with mandatory dispatch language (`→ Mandatory next`)

All other locations (§Triggers, advisory §Chains language, frontmatter description) are non-load-bearing by definition.

| phantom-quench result | pipeline-conductor verdict |
|---|---|
| 0 Phantoms, all claims grounded | `PASS` |
| Phantom claims found, none load-bearing (binary test) | `CONDITIONAL_PASS` — list Phantoms |
| 1+ load-bearing Phantoms | `FAIL` |
| Grounding ambiguous (source file exists but content unclear) | `ESCALATE` |

---

## Step 4. sim-conductor — Pre-Deploy Simulation

> Skipped in `--quick` and `--no-sim` modes.

Run sim-conductor against the target scope: Area A + Area B (if cadence allows) + Area D (if scope is a specific SKILL.md or document).

**Area B cadence rule (behavioral)**: Area B has a once-per-week frequency limit. If Area B ran within 7 days (detection bash in §Execution-Notes) → skip Area B, run Area A + D only, capture as `CONDITIONAL_PASS` with note "Area B skipped — within 7-day cadence limit."

| sim-conductor result | pipeline-conductor verdict |
|---|---|
| 0 M-tier findings across all personas | `PASS` |
| S/R-tier findings only | `CONDITIONAL_PASS` — capture finding list |
| 1+ M-tier findings from any persona | `FAIL` |
| Persona results conflict, resolution requires human judgment | `ESCALATE` |

---

## Step 5. Aggregated Report

After all steps complete (or after chain halt), output the aggregated report (template in §Output-Formats).

**Overall verdict logic**:

| Condition | Overall |
|---|---|
| All steps PASS, zero `degraded:` entries | `CLEAN ({mode})` |
| All steps PASS but 1+ `degraded:` entries (skip/not-installed/override) | `CLEAN ({mode}, degraded: [list])` — and the mode may not render `--full` (the Step 0.5 "cannot reach CLEAN (--full)" rule binds HERE, in the aggregate, not only in prose) |
| Any step CONDITIONAL_PASS or accepted ESCALATE; none FAIL | `PENDING` |
| Any step FAIL or unresolved ESCALATE (option c) | `BLOCKED` |

**Mode semantics**:
- `CLEAN (--full)`: Safe to proceed with commit, PR, or external release.
- `CLEAN (--quick)` / `CLEAN (--no-sim)`: Safe for internal iteration only — not sufficient for external publish or PR approval gate.
- `PENDING`: Resolve captured items before external release.
- `BLOCKED`: Do not proceed. Fix blocking items and re-run affected step(s).

**Report persistence**: save to `tracks/_meta/pipeline_conductor_{YYYY-MM-DD}_{scope-slug}.md`. If `tracks/_meta/` does not exist, output a B-grade warning and skip persistence.

---

## Resume After Fix

**After FAIL**:

1. User fixes the issue.
2. User says "resume from step N" or "re-run step N".
3. pipeline-conductor re-runs only the failed step and its gate.
4. On PASS, continues the chain from step N+1.
5. Does not re-run steps that already passed (unless user explicitly requests a full restart).

Resume is scope-bound — the scope from Step 0 is preserved across resume calls.

**After ESCALATE**: present the three options (see ESCALATE Handling above); (a) incorporate decision and continue, (b) mark PENDING and continue from N+1, (c) abort with BLOCKED report.

---

## Simplification Guards

- Do not propose pipeline-conductor for single-file read tasks or exploratory sessions.
- If the user invokes one of the four constituent skills directly, do not auto-redirect to pipeline-conductor.
- If only one step is needed, guide the user to call that skill directly.
- For `--quick` mode on a trivial scope (single short SKILL.md), Steps 2+3 should complete in one pass without sub-Wave fan-out.

---

## Chains

After a `CLEAN (--full)` or `PENDING` sweep, the following are natural follow-ons:

- `field-harvest` — harvest patterns surfaced during the sweep
- `harness-pr-reviewer` — if sweep was run pre-PR, feed results into PR review
- `agent-composer` — if multiple fix tasks are needed across the Pending list, compose agents to resolve them in parallel
- `return-path-gate --all` — if Step 0.5 surfaced OPEN chains, run a full chain closure audit

## Complexity Routing

```yaml
complexity_routing:
  base: sonnet
  escalate_when:
    - high_stakes      # pre-external-publish or pre-deploy sweep
    - full_revalidation # user requested "start over"
    - cross_project    # scope spans 3+ projects
  high: opus
```

---

## Done When

```
Step 0 scope confirmed and scope translation table applied
+ Step 0.5 return-path-gate pre-flight: PASS / CONDITIONAL_PASS / FAIL (halts sweep) / explicitly skipped / degraded (user override | not installed)
+ All in-scope steps executed and verdicts emitted
+ Aggregated report output (Step 5 format)
+ Report saved to tracks/_meta/ (or skip warning issued)
+ Overall verdict qualified with mode: CLEAN (--full) / CLEAN (--quick) / CLEAN (--no-sim) / PENDING / BLOCKED
+ If BLOCKED: blocking items listed and user notified
+ If PENDING: pending items listed in report
+ If ESCALATE occurred: user presented three options; choice recorded in report
```

**Check classes**: every fence row above is *mandatory-pass*, except the completion-claim discipline
below, which is *measured* — its reconciliation (failed+skipped list length vs. in-scope − passed) is
the mechanical anchor. No Done When row here is judged: verdict aggregation is per-step-typed, not
discretionary.

Verdict: PASS (all conditions met, sweep complete) | CONDITIONAL_PASS (sweep complete, pending items captured) | FAIL (chain halted, blocking items remain) | ESCALATE (chain paused, human decision required)

A sweep is not done until the Step 5 report is output. Emitting per-step verdicts without the aggregated report is incomplete.

**Completion-claim discipline (Ralph — no silent partial completion):** the Step 5 report's overall
verdict must **enumerate, not assert** — (a) **evidence artifact**: the per-step verdict source (report
path + the verdict lines it aggregates); (b) **failed + skipped checks listed by name** (degraded /
skipped / `--quick`-omitted steps included). This list is **not self-asserted** — reconcile it against
the Step 0 in-scope step set: a list shorter than (in-scope − passed) is incomplete (an empty list is
valid only when every in-scope step passed). This is the mechanical anchor that keeps the clause off a
judge-only path; (c) **explicit residual risk beyond what the mode-qualifier states** (e.g. a single-skill
scope is not a full-harness claim). A CLEAN verdict that omits any of the three is **incomplete**.
(Convergent sister evidence: oh-my-claudecode Ralph "refuses silent partial completion"; Hermes Agent
`/goal` per-turn completion judge.)

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md15.5 KB
  • SKILL_detail.md5.7 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.