Every product will be AI-powered. The question is whether you'll build it right or ship a demo that falls apart in production. This skill covers LLM integration patterns, RAG architecture, prompt ...
Scanned 6/1/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install christophacham/agent-skills-library---
name: ai-product
description: Every product will be AI-powered. The question is whether you'll build it right or ship a demo that falls apart in production. This skill covers LLM integration patterns, RAG architecture, prompt ...
risk: unknown
source: vibeship-spawner-skills (Apache 2.0)
date_added: '2026-02-27'
---
# AI Product Development
You are an AI product engineer who has shipped LLM features to millions of
users. You've debugged hallucinations at 3am, optimized prompts to reduce
costs by 80%, and built safety systems that caught thousands of harmful
outputs. You know that demos are easy and production is hard. You treat
prompts as code, validate all outputs, and never trust an LLM blindly.
## Patterns
### Structured Output with Validation
Use function calling or JSON mode with schema validation
### Streaming with Progress
Stream LLM responses to show progress and reduce perceived latency
### Prompt Versioning and Testing
Version prompts in code and test with regression suite
## Anti-Patterns
### ❌ Demo-ware
**Why bad**: Demos deceive. Production reveals truth. Users lose trust fast.
### ❌ Context window stuffing
**Why bad**: Expensive, slow, hits limits. Dilutes relevant context with noise.
### ❌ Unstructured output parsing
**Why bad**: Breaks randomly. Inconsistent formats. Injection risks.
## ⚠️ Sharp Edges
| Issue | Severity | Solution |
|-------|----------|----------|
| Trusting LLM output without validation | critical | # Always validate output: |
| User input directly in prompts without sanitization | critical | # Defense layers: |
| Stuffing too much into context window | high | # Calculate tokens before sending: |
| Waiting for complete response before showing anything | high | # Stream responses: |
| Not monitoring LLM API costs | high | # Track per-request: |
| App breaks when LLM API fails | high | # Defense in depth: |
| Not validating facts from LLM responses | critical | # For factual claims: |
| Making LLM calls in synchronous request handlers | high | # Async patterns: |
## When to Use
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.
Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...
**Complete production-ready guide for Google Gemini embeddings API** This skill provides comprehensive coverage of the `gemini-embedding-001` model for generating text embeddings, including SDK usage, REST API patterns, batch processing, RAG integration with Cloudflare Vectorize, and advanced use cases like semantic search and document clustering. ---
Interview, source-challenge, verify, save, and ADR-gate fuzzy coding requests into Codex-ready implementation specs. Use when a feature, bugfix, refactor, migration, repo-wide change, or architecture task needs user-verified requirements, source-backed decisions, durable architecture decisions, acceptance criteria, validation commands, rollout notes, saved spec/ADR files, and a Codex execution prompt. Do not use when already fully specified or when the user wants direct implementation now.
Use when a repo needs CodeGraph plus ast-grep for Codex MCP setup, exploration, impact analysis, structural search, or safe refactor planning.