Group sequential design methods for interim analyses, alpha spending, and futility stopping. Use when designing trials with interim looks or implementing spending functions.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add choxos/BiostatAgent --skill group-sequential-methods --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Group Sequential Methods?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/choxos-group-sequential-methods)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: group-sequential-methods
description: Group sequential design methods for interim analyses, alpha spending, and futility stopping. Use when designing trials with interim looks or implementing spending functions.
---
# Group Sequential Methods
## When to Use This Skill
- Designing group sequential trials with interim analyses
- Implementing alpha spending functions
- Setting futility stopping rules
- Calculating information fractions
- Using sim_gs_n() for GS simulations
- Integrating with gsDesign2 package
## Fundamental Concepts
### Group Sequential Design
A group sequential design allows for:
- **Early stopping for efficacy**: If treatment effect is larger than expected
- **Early stopping for futility**: If treatment effect is unlikely to reach significance
- **Reduced expected sample size**: When treatment effect is present
### Information Fraction
Information fraction at analysis k:
```
I_k / I_K = (events at analysis k) / (total planned events)
```
For time-to-event trials, information ≈ number of events.
### Type I Error Spending
The key constraint is that the design controls the overall Type I error at the planned alpha level. Spending functions define cumulative alpha spending over information time, and boundaries are derived using the joint distribution of sequential test statistics. They are not obtained by simply assigning independent nominal alpha levels to each look.
## Alpha Spending Functions
### O'Brien-Fleming (OBF)
**Properties:**
- Conservative at early analyses
- Nearly full alpha at final analysis
- Difficult to stop early
- Maintains nominal Type I error
**Formula:**
```
α*(t) = 2 - 2Φ(z_{α/2} / √t)
```
**When to Use:**
- Want maximum power at final analysis
- Early efficacy stopping unlikely
- Regulatory preference for conservative early bounds
### Pocock
**Properties:**
- Equal spending at each analysis
- Easier to stop early
- Inflated final alpha
- Lower power at final analysis
**Formula:**
```
α*(t) = α × log(1 + (e-1)t)
```
**When to Use:**
- Early stopping is a priority
- Treatment effect expected to be large
- Willing to sacrifice final analysis power
### Hwang-Shih-DeCani (HSD)
**Properties:**
- Flexible family indexed by γ
- γ = -4: Similar to OBF
- γ = 1: Similar to Pocock
- γ = 0: Linear (Pocock-like)
**Formula:**
```
α*(t) = α × (1 - e^{-γt}) / (1 - e^{-γ})
```
**When to Use:**
- Want flexibility between OBF and Pocock
- Customized spending pattern needed
### Spending Function Comparison
| Function | Early Spending | Final Power | Early Stopping |
|----------|---------------|-------------|----------------|
| OBF | Low | High | Difficult |
| Pocock | High | Lower | Easier |
| HSD(γ=-4) | Low | High | Difficult |
| HSD(γ=1) | High | Lower | Easier |
## Futility Boundaries
### Binding Futility
- If futility boundary crossed, trial MUST stop
- Affects Type I error calculation
- More powerful than non-binding
### Non-Binding Futility
- Crossing futility boundary is advisory
- Trial can continue at investigator discretion
- Conservative: assumes no early stopping for futility in Type I error
### Beta-Spending for Futility
Similar to alpha-spending, but for Type II error:
```
β*(t) = spending function × β
```
## simtrial GS Implementation
### create_cut() - Define Analysis Timing
```r
# Interim Analysis 1
ia1_cut <- create_cut(
planned_calendar_time = 20, # Minimum 20 months
target_event_overall = 100, # Target 100 events
max_extension_for_target_event = 24, # Wait up to 24 months for events
min_n_overall = 200, # At least 200 enrolled
min_followup = 12 # 12 months minimum follow-up
)
# Interim Analysis 2
ia2_cut <- create_cut(
planned_calendar_time = 32,
target_event_overall = 200,
max_extension_for_target_event = 34,
min_time_after_previous_analysis = 10 # At least 10 months after IA1
)
# Final Analysis
fa_cut <- create_cut(
planned_calendar_time = 45,
target_event_overall = 350
)
```
### sim_gs_n() - Run GS Simulations
```r
library(simtrial)
library(gsDesign2)
# Define enrollment
enroll_rate <- define_enroll_rate(
duration = c(4, 12),
rate = c(10, 30)
)
# Define failure rates
fail_rate <- define_fail_rate(
duration = c(3, 100),
fail_rate = log(2)/9,
hr = c(1, 0.6),
dropout_rate = 0.001
)
# Run simulation
results <- sim_gs_n(
n_sim = 1000,
sample_size = 400,
enroll_rate = enroll_rate,
fail_rate = fail_rate,
test = wlr,
cut = list(ia1 = ia1_cut, ia2 = ia2_cut, fa = fa_cut),
weight = fh(rho = 0, gamma = 0)
)
```
### Integration with gsDesign2
```r
library(gsDesign2)
# Design with gsDesign2
design <- gs_design_ahr(
enroll_rate = define_enroll_rate(duration = c(4, 12), rate = c(10, 30)),
fail_rate = define_fail_rate(
duration = c(3, 100),
fail_rate = log(2)/9,
hr = c(1, 0.6),
dropout_rate = 0.001
),
alpha = 0.025,
beta = 0.1,
analysis_time = c(24, 36, 48),
upper = gs_spending_bound,
upar = list(sf = gsDesign::sfLDOF, total_spend = 0.025),
lower = gs_spending_bound,
lpar = list(sf = gsDesign::sfHSD, param = -4, total_spend = 0.1)
) |> to_integer()
# Simulate with design object
sim_results <- sim_gs_n(
n_sim = 1000,
sample_size = max(design$analysis$n),
enroll_rate = design$enroll_rate,
fail_rate = design$fail_rate,
test = wlr,
cut = NULL, # Auto-generated from design
original_design = design,
weight = fh(rho = 0, gamma = 0)
)
```
### Bound Updates with sim_gs_n()
When using `original_design`, sim_gs_n() can compute updated bounds:
```r
# Results include planned and updated bounds
results <- sim_gs_n(
# ... parameters ...
original_design = design,
ia_alpha_spending = "min_planned_actual", # Conservative
fa_alpha_spending = "full_alpha" # Spend full alpha at FA
)
# Output includes:
# - planned_upper_bound, planned_lower_bound
# - updated_upper_bound, updated_lower_bound
```
**Alpha Spending Options:**
| ia_alpha_spending | Description |
|-------------------|-------------|
| "min_planned_actual" | Conservative: min of planned and actual |
| "actual" | Spend based on actual information |
| fa_alpha_spending | Description |
|-------------------|-------------|
| "full_alpha" | Spend remaining alpha at final |
| "info_frac" | Spend based on information fraction |
## Different Tests Across Analyses
```r
# Different tests at each analysis
ia1_test <- create_test(wlr, weight = fh(rho = 0, gamma = 0))
ia2_test <- create_test(wlr, weight = fh(rho = 0, gamma = 0.5))
fa_test <- create_test(wlr, weight = mb(delay = 6, w_max = Inf))
results <- sim_gs_n(
n_sim = 1000,
sample_size = 400,
enroll_rate = enroll_rate,
fail_rate = fail_rate,
test = list(ia1 = ia1_test, ia2 = ia2_test, fa = fa_test),
cut = list(ia1 = ia1_cut, ia2 = ia2_cut, fa = fa_cut)
)
```
## Common GS Patterns
### Two-Look Design (1 IA + FA)
```r
# IA at 50% information, FA at 100%
ia_cut <- create_cut(target_event_overall = 150) # 50%
fa_cut <- create_cut(target_event_overall = 300) # 100%
sim_gs_n(
n_sim = 1000,
sample_size = 400,
test = wlr,
cut = list(ia = ia_cut, fa = fa_cut),
weight = fh(0, 0)
)
```
### Three-Look Design (2 IA + FA)
```r
# Standard 33%, 67%, 100% information
ia1_cut <- create_cut(target_event_overall = 100)
ia2_cut <- create_cut(target_event_overall = 200)
fa_cut <- create_cut(target_event_overall = 300)
```
### Event-Driven with Calendar Constraints
```r
# Events-based but with minimum calendar time
ia_cut <- create_cut(
target_event_overall = 150,
planned_calendar_time = 18, # At least 18 months
max_extension_for_target_event = 24 # Max 24 months
)
```
## Operating Characteristics
### Key Metrics to Evaluate
1. **Power**: P(reject H0 | H1 true)
2. **Type I Error**: P(reject H0 | H0 true)
3. **Expected Sample Size**: E[N] under H0 and H1
4. **Expected Events**: E[events] at each analysis
5. **Stopping Probabilities**: P(stop at analysis k)
### Simulation Summary
```r
# Summarize simulation results
results_summary <- results |>
group_by(analysis) |>
summarise(
mean_events = mean(event),
mean_z = mean(z),
power = mean(z < qnorm(0.025)), # One-sided
.groups = "drop"
)
```
## Best Practices
1. **Information Fraction**: Target evenly spaced (e.g., 50%, 100% or 33%, 67%, 100%)
2. **Alpha Spending**: OBF is default for most regulatory submissions
3. **Futility**: Use non-binding to preserve flexibility
4. **Validation**: Compare simulated power to gsDesign analytical results
5. **Documentation**: Record all boundary calculations for regulatory submission
6. **Parallelization**: Use `plan("multisession")` for large simulations
## Regulatory Considerations
- Pre-specify number and timing of interim analyses
- Pre-specify spending function and parameters
- Document stopping rules clearly in protocol
- Consider DSMB recommendations for unblinded reviews
- Maintain blinding for operational team
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!