Chorus Development workflow — claim tasks, report work, manage sessions, and run wave-based execution on dsh.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Chorus-AIDLC/Chorus --skill develop-chorus --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Develop Chorus?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/chorus-aidlc-develop-chorus-chorus)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: develop-chorus
description: Chorus Development workflow — claim tasks, report work, manage sessions, and run wave-based execution on dsh.
license: AGPL-3.0
metadata:
author: chorus
version: "0.17.0"
category: project-management
mcp_server: chorus
---
# Develop Skill
This skill covers the **Development** stage of the AI-DLC workflow: claiming Tasks, writing code, reporting progress, submitting for verification, and managing sessions for sub-agent observability.
> **Tool namespace:** Chorus tools are exposed by the connected MCP server under a `mcp__chorus__` prefix on dsh (e.g. `mcp__chorus__chorus_claim_task`). Bare names are used below for readability — prepend `mcp__chorus__` when invoking. See `chorus` for the full rule.
---
## Overview
Developer Agents take Tasks created by PM Agents (via `proposal-chorus`) and turn them into working code. Each task follows:
```
claim --> in_progress --> report work --> self-check AC --> submit for verify --> reviewer --> Admin /review
```
For multi-task execution, dsh runs **sequential waves** (the main agent works tasks in dependency order) — see [Wave-Based Execution](#wave-based-execution-on-dsh) below.
---
## Tools
**Task Lifecycle:**
| Tool | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `chorus_claim_task` | Claim an open task (open -> assigned) |
| `chorus_release_task` | Release a claimed task (assigned -> open) |
| `chorus_update_task` | Update task status (in_progress / to_verify) |
| `chorus_submit_for_verify` | Submit task for admin verification with summary |
**Work Reporting:**
| Tool | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `chorus_report_work` | Report progress or completion (writes comment + records activity, with optional status update) |
**Acceptance Criteria:**
| Tool | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `chorus_report_criteria_self_check` | Report self-check results (passed/failed + optional evidence) on structured acceptance criteria |
**Session (sub-agents only — main agent skips these):**
| Tool | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `chorus_create_session` | Create a session for a sub-agent (manual on dsh — see below) |
| `chorus_session_checkin_task` | Checkin to a task before starting work |
| `chorus_session_checkout_task` | Checkout from a task when work is done |
| `chorus_close_session` | Close the session when the sub-agent finishes |
Sub-agents: always pass `sessionUuid` to `chorus_update_task` and `chorus_report_work` for attribution.
Main agent / Team Lead: call these tools without `sessionUuid` — no session needed.
**Shared tools** (checkin, query, comment, search, notifications): see `chorus`
---
## Workflow
### Step 1: Check In
```
chorus_checkin()
```
Review your persona, current assignments, and pending work counts.
### Step 1.5: Manage Your Session (Sub-Agents Only)
**Skip if you are the main agent.**
> **dsh difference:** the Claude Code plugin auto-creates and auto-injects a sub-agent's session via a SubagentStart hook. **dsh does not run that hook.** Session handling is **manual**: if you are a sub-agent and the host did not hand you a `sessionUuid`, create one yourself once at the start, keep it for all task operations, and close it when you finish.
```
# Create your own session (only if no sessionUuid was provided to you)
chorus_create_session({ name: "<descriptive-worker-name>" })
# -> keep the returned sessionUuid for every task call below
```
If the dsh host *did* inject a `sessionUuid` into your prompt (some hosts forward parent context), reuse it instead of creating a new one. When in doubt, create one — duplicate idle sessions are harmless and auto-go-inactive after 1h.
### Step 2: Find Work
```
chorus_get_available_tasks({ projectUuid: "<project-uuid>" })
```
Or check existing assignments:
```
chorus_get_my_assignments()
```
### Step 3: Claim a Task
```
chorus_get_task({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>" }) # Review first
chorus_claim_task({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>" })
```
Check: description, acceptance criteria, priority, story points, related proposal/documents.
### Step 4: Gather Context
Each task and proposal includes a `commentCount` field — use it to decide which entities have discussions worth reading.
1. **Read the task** and identify dependencies:
```
chorus_get_task({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>" })
```
Pay attention to `dependsOn` (upstream tasks) and `commentCount`.
2. **Read task comments** (contains previous work reports, progress, feedback):
```
chorus_get_comments({ targetType: "task", targetUuid: "<task-uuid>" })
```
3. **Review upstream dependency tasks** — your work likely builds on theirs:
```
chorus_get_task({ taskUuid: "<dependency-task-uuid>" })
chorus_get_comments({ targetType: "task", targetUuid: "<dependency-task-uuid>" })
```
Look for: files created, API contracts, interfaces, trade-offs.
4. **Read the originating proposal** for design intent:
```
chorus_get_proposal({ proposalUuid: "<proposal-uuid>", section: "documents" })
```
(`chorus_get_proposal` defaults to `section: "basic"` — just metadata + a draft index. Pass `section: "documents"` for the design docs, or `section: "full"` for docs + task drafts.)
5. **Read project documents** (PRD, tech design, ADR):
```
chorus_get_documents({ projectUuid: "<project-uuid>" })
```
> **Document update flow (OpenSpec mode):** if the originating proposal `description` contains a line `OpenSpec change slug: <slug>`, the project's PRD / tech_design / spec Documents are **mirrors** of files under `openspec/changes/<slug>/`. To update such a Document (e.g. clarify an AC, fix a spec scenario before resubmitting), load the `openspec-aware-chorus` skill and follow §3.8: edit the local `.md` file first, then mirror it — prefer `chorus mcp call … --arg-file content=<file>`, falling back to the package-local `CHORUS_MCP_CALL` wrapper with `json_encode_file` when `chorus` is not on `PATH` — with `chorus_check_response` halting on error. (dsh has no SessionStart hook; the chorus-dsh bundle precomputes `CHORUS_OPENSPEC_ACTIVE` at load and the skill reads it, recomputing the three checks inline only as a fallback — see `openspec-aware-chorus` §1.)
>
> **⛔ Do not** call `chorus_pm_update_document` directly from the MCP harness with a hand-typed `content` field in OpenSpec mode. The local file is the source of truth; agent-typed content drifts and burns tokens (`openspec-aware-chorus` §2 Rule 1).
>
> When the LAST task of an OpenSpec idea is verified, run the archive flow yourself (`openspec-aware-chorus` §3.9): run `openspec archive <slug> --yes`, then mirror each emitted `openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md` back via §3.8. **dsh has no PostToolUse hook to remind you** — check after each verify whether the just-verified task was the last of its idea, and if so trigger the archive flow yourself.
>
> In the no-OpenSpec fallback (no slug line, or no `openspec` CLI), edit the Document content directly via the existing MCP tool with no wrapper, no local file step.
### Step 5: Start Working
**Sub-agent**: checkin to the task first:
```
chorus_session_checkin_task({ sessionUuid: "<session-uuid>", taskUuid: "<task-uuid>" })
```
Then mark as in-progress:
```
# Sub-agent:
chorus_update_task({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>", status: "in_progress", sessionUuid: "<session-uuid>" })
# Main agent:
chorus_update_task({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>", status: "in_progress" })
```
> **Dependency enforcement**: If this task has unresolved dependencies (dependsOn tasks not in `done` or `closed`), the call will be rejected with detailed blocker info. Use `chorus_get_unblocked_tasks` to find tasks you can start now.
### Step 6: Report Progress
Report periodically with `chorus_report_work`. Include:
- What was completed
- Files created or modified
- Git commits and PRs
- Current status / remaining work
- Blockers or questions
```
chorus_report_work({
taskUuid: "<task-uuid>",
report: "Progress:\n- Created src/services/auth.service.ts\n- Commit: abc1234\n- Remaining: unit tests",
sessionUuid: "<session-uuid>"
})
```
Report with status update when complete:
```
chorus_report_work({
taskUuid: "<task-uuid>",
report: "All implementation complete:\n- Files: ...\n- PR: https://github.com/org/repo/pull/42\n- All tests passing",
status: "to_verify",
sessionUuid: "<session-uuid>"
})
```
### Step 7: Self-Check Acceptance Criteria
Before submitting, check structured acceptance criteria:
```
task = chorus_get_task({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>" })
# If task.acceptanceCriteriaItems is non-empty:
chorus_report_criteria_self_check({
taskUuid: "<task-uuid>",
criteria: [
{ uuid: "<criterion-uuid>", devStatus: "passed", devEvidence: "Unit tests cover this" },
{ uuid: "<criterion-uuid>", devStatus: "passed", devEvidence: "Verified manually" }
]
})
```
> For **required** criteria, keep working until you can self-check as `passed`. Only use `failed` for **optional** criteria that are out of scope.
### Step 8: Submit for Verification
**Sub-agents** — checkout first:
```
chorus_session_checkout_task({ sessionUuid: "<session-uuid>", taskUuid: "<task-uuid>" })
```
Then submit:
```
chorus_submit_for_verify({
taskUuid: "<task-uuid>",
summary: "Implemented auth feature:\n- Added login/logout endpoints\n- JWT middleware\n- 95% test coverage\n- All AC self-checked (3/3 passed)"
})
```
> `to_verify` does NOT unblock downstream tasks — only `done` (after admin verification) does.
### Step 8.5: Run the Task Reviewer (inline — no hook on dsh)
> **dsh difference:** the Claude Code plugin relies on a PostToolUse hook to inject a "spawn the reviewer" reminder after `chorus_submit_for_verify`. **dsh has no such hook.** Run the reviewer step **inline**, right here, immediately after submitting. Do not wait for an injected reminder.
Obtain an independent VERDICT before the task is verified:
1. **Preferred — spawn a reviewer sub-agent (foreground).** Use the dsh `subagent` tool to spawn a sub-agent with **`run_in_background: false`** (foreground — the call waits and returns the result inline; the verify/reopen decision depends on the verdict) whose task tells it to call the `skill` tool with `task-reviewer-chorus`, then review the task. The authoritative result is the newest `VERDICT:` comment on the task. Set `run_in_background: true` (a continuable/background sub-agent whose settlement notice you collect later) only when you deliberately want to fan out and don't need the verdict before your next step.
> `Load and run the task-reviewer-chorus skill to verify taskUuid <uuid>. Read the task, its AC, the proposal documents, and the code; run the project's tests; verify each AC independently; post your VERDICT comment on the task when done.`
2. **Fallback — review it yourself.** If `subagent` is unavailable on your host (spawning disabled by policy), perform the review yourself as a **focused, read-only pass** following the `task-reviewer-chorus` skill's procedure: read `chorus_get_task`, `chorus_get_comments`, the originating proposal and its documents; read the code that implements each AC (do not trust the developer summary); run the project's test/build commands; verify each acceptance criterion independently. Then record the result yourself via `chorus_add_comment` ending with a `VERDICT:` line (PASS / PASS WITH NOTES / FAIL). Do NOT modify project files during this pass — it is review-only (read-only bash for tests/build is fine). Use the same BLOCKER vs NOTE classification the `task-reviewer-chorus` skill defines.
3. **Read the VERDICT and act:**
```
chorus_get_comments({ targetType: "task", targetUuid: "<task-uuid>" })
```
Find the most recent comment containing `VERDICT:`:
- **VERDICT: PASS** — All AC verified, no issues. Proceed to admin verification.
- **VERDICT: PASS WITH NOTES** — All AC verified, minor notes. Proceed to admin verification (notes are non-blocking).
- **VERDICT: FAIL** — BLOCKERs found. Do NOT verify. Fix the BLOCKERs listed in the reviewer's comment, then resubmit (Step 9).
If you spawned a sub-agent and no new `VERDICT:` comment appears after it returns, it exhausted its turn budget. Respawn it ONCE with a concise-budget hint: *"Stay within turn budget. Skip deep verification. Fetch task/proposal/comments, run only the core tests, and post your VERDICT within the first 12 turns."* If the second attempt still produces no VERDICT, fall back to reviewing manually (Step 8.5 fallback) and post the VERDICT yourself.
> **Final code-review gateway (after the Idea's LAST task is verified):** when the task you just verified is the **last** task of its idea-rooted proposal, the feature is about to ship — run the ship-time code-review gateway before declaring the Idea done. Inline (no hook on dsh), same mechanism as Step 8.5: spawn a sub-agent via `subagent` with **`run_in_background: false`** (foreground — the call waits and returns the verdict inline; the ship decision depends on it; set `run_in_background: true` only to deliberately fan out) whose `task` tells it to **call the `skill` tool with `code-reviewer-chorus` and follow it** against the idea (pass the `ideaUuid` + round number); fallback is a read-only self-review following the `code-reviewer-chorus` procedure. It reviews the Idea's **aggregate** code change (cross-task integration, architecture, security, regression, feature-level coverage) and posts one `VERDICT:` comment on the **idea**. `PASS` / `PASS WITH NOTES` → ship; `FAIL` → fix via the **quick-dev** workflow (`quick-dev-chorus`): `chorus_create_tasks` with `proposalUuid` set to the **current approved proposal** so the fix tasks attach to it (do not reopen old tasks). Group related small BLOCKERs into one cohesive task by default; split only materially large or independently testable fixes. Each fix task must self-check its acceptance criteria and pass independent task review plus admin verification. Re-run the gateway only after every fix task is successfully `done`; if there is a failed or cancelled fix task, stop and escalate instead. Advisory/behavioral. Run it **before** any idea-completion report.
### Step 9: Handle Review Feedback
If the reviewer returns **FAIL**, or the task is reopened after verification:
**All acceptance criteria are reset to pending** when a task is reopened.
1. Check feedback:
```
chorus_get_task({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>" })
chorus_get_comments({ targetType: "task", targetUuid: "<task-uuid>" })
```
2. Fix every BLOCKER listed in the reviewer's FAIL comment.
3. Checkin again (sub-agent), fix issues, report fixes, resubmit, and re-run the reviewer (Step 8.5).
### Step 10: Task Complete
Once Admin verifies (status: `done`), move to the next available task (back to Step 2).
### Step 11: Idea Completion Report (advisory)
If the task you just self-verified was the LAST one of its Idea and you have `document:write`, create the completion report when the wake explicitly requests it. Otherwise leave it for the orchestrator; in a daemon-headless turn, do not block task completion on an interactive report choice.
---
## Session (Sub-Agents Only)
> **dsh difference:** session lifecycle is **manual** on dsh. The Claude Code plugin automates creation, heartbeat, and cleanup via hooks; dsh does not run those hooks. A sub-agent therefore manages its own session:
1. `chorus_create_session({ name })` — once at the start, unless the host already gave you a `sessionUuid`
2. `chorus_session_checkin_task({ sessionUuid, taskUuid })` — before starting work on each task
3. Pass `sessionUuid` to `chorus_update_task` and `chorus_report_work` for attribution
4. `chorus_session_checkout_task({ sessionUuid, taskUuid })` — when done with each task
5. `chorus_close_session({ sessionUuid })` — when the sub-agent finishes (no hook closes it for you)
To keep a long-running session visible/active, send `chorus_session_heartbeat({ sessionUuid })` periodically (any session-touching tool also refreshes it).
**Main agent / Team Lead**: no session needed — call tools without `sessionUuid`.
---
## Wave-Based Execution on dsh
> **dsh difference:** dsh has **no Agent Teams / `TeamCreate` primitive**. The Claude Code plugin can spawn a parallel team per wave; on dsh you (the main agent) execute tasks **sequentially** in dependency order. This is slower than parallel teams but completes the same pipeline.
### Sequential wave loop
```
loop:
# 1. Find ready tasks (all dependencies done/closed)
unblocked = chorus_get_unblocked_tasks({ projectUuid: "<project-uuid>" })
if no unblocked tasks and all tasks done/closed:
break # All complete
if no unblocked tasks but some remain (not done):
break with escalation note # stuck — likely a failed review blocking the DAG
# 2. Work each unblocked task yourself, in order:
for each task in unblocked:
chorus_claim_task({ taskUuid: task.uuid })
chorus_update_task({ taskUuid: task.uuid, status: "in_progress" })
# ... read context, implement, run tests (Steps 4-7) ...
chorus_report_work({ taskUuid: task.uuid, report: "...", status: "to_verify" })
chorus_report_criteria_self_check({ taskUuid: task.uuid, criteria: [...] })
chorus_submit_for_verify({ taskUuid: task.uuid, summary: "..." })
# Step 8.5: run the task-reviewer inline; act on its VERDICT
# If you have task:admin, verify the task to "done" (this unblocks dependents)
# 3. Loop — chorus_get_unblocked_tasks now returns the next wave
```
> **Critical:** `to_verify` does NOT resolve dependencies — only `done` or `closed` does. A task must be **verified to `done`** (by an Admin, or by you if you hold `task:admin`) before its dependents become unblocked. If you lack `task:admin`, submit each task for verify and ask the project's admin to verify between waves, then re-run `chorus_get_unblocked_tasks`.
> **Claude-Code-only optimization (degrades to sequential here):** under the Claude Code plugin, each wave can be dispatched in parallel via `TeamCreate` + per-task sub-agents. dsh has no such primitive, so the loop above runs serially. Do NOT attempt to call `TeamCreate` on dsh — it does not exist.
### Optional: sub-agent dispatch
If your dsh host *does* support spawning worker sub-agents (not Agent Teams, just generic sub-agents), you may hand each a task. Because there is no SubagentStart hook, the worker prompt **must** include the manual session instructions explicitly:
```
Your Chorus task UUID: <task-uuid>
Project UUID: <project-uuid>
Session handling is MANUAL on dsh:
1. chorus_create_session({ name: "<worker-name>" }) -> keep the sessionUuid
2. chorus_session_checkin_task({ sessionUuid, taskUuid })
3. chorus_update_task({ taskUuid, status: "in_progress", sessionUuid })
4. implement, then chorus_report_work({ ..., sessionUuid })
5. chorus_report_criteria_self_check({ taskUuid, criteria: [...] })
6. chorus_session_checkout_task({ sessionUuid, taskUuid })
7. chorus_submit_for_verify({ taskUuid, summary })
8. chorus_close_session({ sessionUuid })
```
The main agent still owns review + verification between waves.
### MCP Access for Sub-Agents
If you dispatch sub-agents, ensure they can reach the Chorus MCP server — the plugin config (and therefore the `mcp__chorus__*` tools) must be available in the sub-agent's environment, and the API key must carry the needed permissions.
### Troubleshooting
| Problem | Solution |
|---------|----------|
| Sub-agent can't access Chorus MCP tools | Verify the Chorus MCP server is registered/connected for the sub-agent and the API key has developer permissions |
| UI doesn't show active workers | Sub-agent forgot `chorus_session_checkin_task`, or never created a session. Check `chorus_get_session` / `chorus_list_sessions` |
| Session disappears from Settings | No activity for 1h (default lists hide stale sessions). The session row still exists — reachable via `chorus_list_sessions` / `chorus_get_session`. Send `chorus_session_heartbeat` (or any session-touching tool) to make it visible again |
| Task stuck in wrong status | Use `chorus_update_task` to reset, or have the worker re-checkin |
| Duplicate sessions | On dsh the sub-agent creates its own session — if it created several, close extras via `chorus_close_session` or the Settings page |
---
## Work Report Best Practices
**Good report (enables session continuity):**
```
Implemented password reset flow:
Files created/modified:
- src/services/auth.service.ts (new)
- src/app/api/auth/reset/route.ts (new)
- tests/auth/reset.test.ts (new)
Git:
- Commit: a1b2c3d "feat: password reset flow"
- PR: https://github.com/org/repo/pull/15
Implementation details:
- POST /api/auth/reset-request: sends email with token
- Token expires after 1 hour, single-use
- Rate limiting: 3 requests/hour/email
- 12 new tests, all passing
Acceptance criteria:
- [x] User can request reset via email
- [x] Reset link expires after 1 hour
- [x] Rate limiting prevents abuse
```
**Bad report:** `Done.`
---
## Tips
- **Read task comments first** — they contain previous work reports for session continuity
- **Check upstream dependencies** — read `dependsOn` tasks and their comments for interfaces/APIs
- **Read the originating proposal** — understand design rationale and task DAG
- **Use `commentCount`** — skip fetching comments on entities with count 0
- Report progress frequently — include file paths, commits, and PRs
- Write detailed submit summaries — Admin needs them to verify
- Always run the reviewer inline after submit (Step 8.5) — dsh has no hook to remind you
- Sessions are manual on dsh — create, checkin/checkout, and close your own session as a sub-agent
- If blocked, add a comment and consider releasing the task
- One task at a time: finish or release before claiming another
---
## When to Release a Task
Release if:
- You can't complete it (missing knowledge, blocked)
- A higher-priority task needs attention
- You won't finish in a reasonable timeframe
```
chorus_release_task({ taskUuid: "<task-uuid>" })
chorus_add_comment({ targetType: "task", targetUuid: "<task-uuid>", content: "Releasing: reason..." })
```
---
## Next
- After submitting for verification, an Admin reviews using `review-chorus`
- **Human "Yolo" wake:** a `yolo_requested` wake (the human clicked **Yolo** on the idea-detail panel) means: drive the WHOLE idea to done via the yolo skill (the full-auto AI-DLC pipeline), not just the execute stage — read the idea's current state and resume from whatever phase it is in. It is stage-adaptive, and it must never merge or push a PR without explicit human approval.
- For platform overview and shared tools, see `chorus`
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!