Skip to content
Back to skills

Trace

ASecurity

Use when encountering bugs, test failures, runtime errors, unexpected behavior, broken builds, or "this doesn't work" reports. Systematic root-cause analysis before any patch — never blind-patches symptoms. Standalone (off the spec → scope → dispatch chain). Ends with a thinking-tier review of the fix.

  • 930 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 6, 2026
ai-agentsgotesting

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 6, 2026

npx -y skills add ccplugins/awesome-claude-code-plugins --skill trace --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Trace?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Trace
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/ccplugins-trace/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ccplugins-trace)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: trace
description: Use when encountering bugs, test failures, runtime errors, unexpected behavior, broken builds, or "this doesn't work" reports. Systematic root-cause analysis before any patch — never blind-patches symptoms. Standalone (off the spec → scope → dispatch chain). Ends with a thinking-tier review of the fix.
---

# Trace

Root cause, not symptom. Never patch over a bug without understanding why it happened.

Dispatcher and reviewer — Opus 4.7 (thinking-tier). Implementer/Searcher/Writer — Sonnet 4.6.

## Per-Step Agent Map (DOCTRINE rule 12)

Every substantive step dispatches at least one Agent.

| Step | Worker tier | Thinking tier | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 — Reproduce | Searcher (Sonnet) if repro missing | **Reviewer** (Opus) confirms repro is valid | Both tiers if dispatched |
| 2 — Gather evidence | Searcher × 3 (Sonnet) parallel | **Reviewer** (Opus) verifies evidence coverage | Both tiers |
| 3 — Hypothesize | — | **Debugger** (Opus) produces ranked hypotheses | Pure thinking |
| 4 — Verify | Implementer (Sonnet) minimal change | **Debugger** (Opus) re-evaluates against evidence | Both tiers · loop |
| 5 — Fix at root | Implementer (Sonnet) | **Reviewer** (Opus) checks no error-swallow / no symptom-patch | Both tiers |
| 6 — Regression test | Writer (Sonnet) | **Reviewer** (Opus) confirms test fails-without / passes-with | Both tiers |
| 7 — Memory + final | Writer (Sonnet) appends pitfall | **Reviewer** (Opus) final validation | Both tiers |

## Step 1 — Reproduce

Agents — `Searcher` (Sonnet, if needed) ⇒ **Reviewer** (Opus).

1. Confirm the bug is reproducible.
2. If repro steps missing — dispatch `Searcher — locating bug reproduction in recent changes/tests`.
3. Dispatch `**Reviewer** — confirming reproduction is valid` to validate the repro actually fails for the stated reason (not a flake).
4. If environmental (CI-only, intermittent, time-dependent) — flag explicitly before proceeding.

## Step 2 — Gather Evidence (parallel)

Agents — `Searcher` × 3 (Sonnet) parallel ⇒ **Reviewer** (Opus).

1. Dispatch simultaneously in a single message:
   - `Searcher — reading error stack traces and logs`
   - `Searcher — mapping the code paths involved`
   - `Searcher — finding related tests (passing and failing)`
2. Dispatch `**Reviewer** — verifying evidence coverage` to confirm the three Searchers actually triangulate the failure surface. If gaps remain, redispatch.

## Step 3 — Hypothesize

Agents — **Debugger** (Opus, thinking-tier).

Dispatch `**Debugger** — root cause analysis: <bug-summary>` — model: opus.

Apply **5 Whys** + **hypothesis testing** + **bisect mindset**:
- Why does this fail? → because X → why X? → because Y → continue to root
- Output 1–3 hypotheses ranked by likelihood, each with:
  - **What** — suspected root cause
  - **Evidence** — what supports it
  - **Counter-evidence** — what would falsify it
  - **Test** — minimal change to verify

## Step 4 — Verify

Agents — `Implementer` (Sonnet) ⇒ **Debugger** (Opus).

1. Pick highest-ranked hypothesis.
2. Dispatch `Implementer — verifying hypothesis: <hypothesis>` — make the minimal change needed to confirm/falsify.
3. Dispatch `**Debugger** — re-evaluating hypothesis against test result` to re-check against the evidence from Step 2.
4. Confirmed → proceed to Step 5. Falsified → return to Step 3 with next hypothesis.

## Step 5 — Fix at Root

Agents — `Implementer` (Sonnet) ⇒ **Reviewer** (Opus).

1. Dispatch `Implementer — fixing root cause: <root-cause>` with full context: the bug, the verified root cause, the minimal fix.
2. Dispatch `**Reviewer** — checking fix is at root` to verify the fix actually addresses the cause and doesn't patch the symptom.

Constraints (non-negotiable):
- No error swallowing
- No defensive try/catch around the symptom
- No flags or feature gates to hide the bug

## Step 6 — Regression Test

Agents — `Writer` (Sonnet) ⇒ **Reviewer** (Opus).

1. Dispatch `Writer — adding regression test for <bug>`.
2. Dispatch `**Reviewer** — confirming regression test fails-without and passes-with the fix`.
3. If existing suite had gaps that allowed this bug → note in `.hyperflow/memory/pitfalls.md`.

## Step 7 — Memory + Final Review

Agents — `Writer` (Sonnet) ⇒ **Reviewer** (Opus).

1. Dispatch `Writer — appending pitfall to .hyperflow/memory/pitfalls.md` per [memory-system.md](../hyperflow/memory-system.md): the bug pattern, why tests missed it, prevention strategy. Tags — `pitfall` plus domain tags.
2. Dispatch `**Reviewer** — final validation of fix + test + memory entry`. This is the integration review for the trace flow.

## Anti-Patterns (refuse these)

| Symptom patch | Why it's wrong |
|---|---|
| "Just catch the exception" | Find why it threw |
| "Add a null check" | Find why it was null |
| "Increase the timeout" | Find why it's slow |
| "Retry on failure" | Understand the failure mode first |

## Output Format

```
── Debug Result ─────────────────────
Bug: <one-line>
Reproducible: yes / no / intermittent
Root cause: <one-line>
Fix: <one-line summary>
Files changed: <list>
Regression test: <path>
─────────────────────────────────────
```

End with usage summary (model names, agent count, token totals) per [output-style.md](../hyperflow/output-style.md).

## Hand-off

Debug is **off the auto-chain** — it's standalone. After Step 7 reviewer passes, stop and suggest `/hyperflow:deploy` to run pre-push gates and commit the fix + regression test together. Do **not** auto-invoke ship — push requires explicit user opt-in.

## Doctrine

Full rules in [DOCTRINE.md](../hyperflow/DOCTRINE.md). See also [worker-prompt.md](../hyperflow/worker-prompt.md) and [reviewer-prompt.md](../hyperflow/reviewer-prompt.md).

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.