Use when a deliberate shortcut is taken during a fix or feature, when investigating a bug that might already be logged, or when closing out an entry after a proper fix lands.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ccplugins/awesome-claude-code-plugins --skill logging-tradeoffs --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Logging Tradeoffs?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ccplugins-logging-tradeoffs)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: logging-tradeoffs
description: Use when a deliberate shortcut is taken during a fix or feature, when investigating a bug that might already be logged, or when closing out an entry after a proper fix lands.
---
# Logging Tradeoffs
## Overview
A shortcut without a record is a landmine for whoever touches the code next — often future-you.
This skill defines one convention, `KNOWN_ISSUES.md`, kept at the root of each project, so
deliberate tradeoffs are findable instead of rediscovered the hard way.
**Core principle:** if you knowingly ship something imperfect, write down what, why, and when to
revisit it — in the same motion as writing the code, not as a follow-up you'll forget.
## Before creating a new entry
1. Check whether `KNOWN_ISSUES.md` already exists at the project root. If an equivalent file
exists under a different name (`TODO.md`, `ISSUES.md`, `BACKLOG.md`), don't create a duplicate
— ask the user whether to adopt the existing file for this convention instead.
2. If the project has `graphify-out/graph.json`, use the `graphify-recurring-bugs` skill's dedup
check first — a new bug may be the same root cause as an existing open entry, not a new one.
3. **Ask before creating the file** if it doesn't exist yet. This is a new file the user didn't
explicitly request — surface the proposed content, get a yes, then write it.
## Entry format
Append one block per issue, most recent first:
```
## <date> — <short title>
- What changed / what shortcut was taken:
- Ceiling (when this breaks):
- Upgrade trigger (what to do when it's hit):
- Status: open | resolved (<date>, <how>)
```
- **What changed**: the concrete simplification, with a `file:line` reference where relevant.
- **Ceiling**: the specific condition under which this stops being good enough — not vague, a
testable fact ("more than 10k rows", "concurrent writers", "amounts with fractional cents").
- **Upgrade trigger**: what to actually do when the ceiling is hit — a real next step, not "fix
it properly later."
- **Status**: flip to `resolved` with a date and one line on how, when addressed. Don't delete
resolved entries — they're evidence the log is actually maintained, not decoration.
## When touching a file with an open entry
If `reviewer` or `coder` touches a file referenced by an open `KNOWN_ISSUES.md` entry, say
explicitly whether the current change resolves that entry, is unrelated to it, or makes it worse.
Silence here is how the same shortcut gets shipped around three times.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!