Captures how a person or brand actually writes and turns it into reusable voice instructions every other content skill draws from. Use this before drafting any content for a new brand or client, when output keeps coming back sounding generic, when several writers need to sound like one, or when a voice needs defining without existing samples to learn from.
Scanned 9/1/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add cbrock84/headcount --skill brand-voice --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Brand Voice?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/cbrock84-brand-voice)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: brand-voice
description: Captures how a person or brand actually writes and turns it into reusable voice instructions every other content skill draws from. Use this before drafting any content for a new brand or client, when output keeps coming back sounding generic, when several writers need to sound like one, or when a voice needs defining without existing samples to learn from.
---
# Brand voice
The upstream dependency for every writing skill. Draft before this exists and it comes back sounding
like everyone else.
## With existing samples
Collect ten to twenty real pieces the person considers representative — their best, not their most
recent. Then extract, with evidence:
- **Sentence rhythm** — average length, and whether they vary it deliberately. Most distinctive
voices are distinguished by rhythm before vocabulary.
- **Vocabulary tells** — the words they reach for and the register they avoid. Note both.
- **Opening moves** — how they start. Most writers have two or three habitual openings.
- **Stance** — do they assert, hedge, question, or provoke? Who do they assume the reader is?
- **Humor and its absence** — where it appears and where it never does.
- **Formatting habits** — paragraph length, list usage, emphasis.
Quote a real example for each. A voice guide with adjectives and no samples is unusable.
## Without samples
Build from a choice rather than a blank page. Offer archetypes — the practitioner showing their
work, the analyst, the contrarian, the teacher, the insider, the enthusiast — with a written
paragraph in each. Let them react. People cannot describe their voice but recognize it instantly.
Then interview around the choice: who are you writing for, what do you want them to feel, what would
you never say.
## The output
Produce two artifacts other skills read:
- **`voice.md`** — the rules, each with a real example and a counter-example.
- **`about-me.md`** — background, expertise, recurring themes, and the stories available to draw on.
Include a **do-not** list. Voice guides fail on what they permit, not what they prescribe.
## Verifying
Draft two paragraphs and read them to the person cold. If they say "close, but I wouldn't say it
that way," ask exactly what they would say — that correction is the most valuable data in the
process.
## Never
- Build a voice guide from copy the person did not write. Agency and ghostwritten material describes someone else's voice.
- Describe voice in adjectives alone. "Friendly but authoritative" is unusable without paired examples of what passes and what fails.
- Apply a voice guide to a format it was never sampled from. How someone writes an email is not how they write a keynote.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!