Designs orchestrator-and-subagent hierarchies for a repository — splitting agents by exclusive write surface, pairing every producer with an independent auditor, and enforcing the split with a script that runs in CI. Use this whenever the user wants to set up, expand, audit, or fix a multi-agent or subagent structure for a codebase; asks how to divide work between agents; wants agent charters, roles, or a surface map written; or is hitting agents that collide on the same files, review their o...
Scanned 9/1/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add cbrock84/headcount --skill agent-hierarchy --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Agent Hierarchy?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/cbrock84-agent-hierarchy)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: agent-hierarchy
description: Designs orchestrator-and-subagent hierarchies for a repository — splitting agents by exclusive write surface, pairing every producer with an independent auditor, and enforcing the split with a script that runs in CI. Use this whenever the user wants to set up, expand, audit, or fix a multi-agent or subagent structure for a codebase; asks how to divide work between agents; wants agent charters, roles, or a surface map written; or is hitting agents that collide on the same files, review their own work, or drift from their remit. Also use when sizing a roster or deciding whether a new agent is justified.
---
# Agent hierarchy
A method for standing up an orchestrator → specialist-subagent hierarchy, extracted from a
working implementation of ~24 agents over a 1,500-file monorepo, machine-checked on every PR.
## The whole method in one paragraph
Split agents by **write surface, not by topic**. Two classes only: **builders**, which edit
inside exactly one exclusive surface and never commit, and **reviewers**, which are permanently
read-only and can always run in parallel. The orchestrator — the main chat — is the sole
committer. Write the surface map **before** any charters, keep it in one Markdown file, and
enforce it with a script that runs in CI. Each row also carries an **authority** — `autonomous`,
`proposes`, or `escalates` — which answers the separate question of whether that agent's work may
land without a decision; most rows are `autonomous`, and gating everything makes the gate
meaningless. Producer and auditor are never the same agent. For
each class of fact, exactly one file owns it and everyone else derives.
## Why topic splits fail
"One agent on SEO, one on UI" is the intuitive split and it breaks immediately: both end up
editing `tokens.css`. Neither is wrong, and neither can be held responsible. A surface split
has no such overlap by construction — which is exactly what makes it checkable.
## Order of operations
Do not start writing charters early; the order is the method.
1. **Inventory the real tree** — `git ls-files | sed 's|/[^/]*$||' | sort -u`. Report what is
actually there before proposing anything.
2. **Propose the roster** — the smallest set where no two agents share a file. Each needs an
id, a class, a one-line remit, and its exact globs. An agent whose surface cannot be stated
in globs is not an agent; fold it in.
3. **Write the surface map** — one Markdown file, one row per agent.
4. **Wire the guard** — `scripts/agent-guard.mjs check` proves the map is coherent (no path
claimed twice, no path unowned); `agent-guard.mjs diff <agent>` proves a given diff obeyed
it. Both are needed: once the orchestrator commits, the authorship that `diff` checks is
gone, so it has to run while the work is still attributable.
5. **Write charters last**, in the format in the playbook: why the agent exists, what it must
never do, the verification its surface implies, and a six-section return contract.
## Rules that carry a failure behind them
- **Producer and auditor are never the same agent.** An agent that reviews its own output
reliably approves it.
- **The orchestrator is not one of the two classes.** It is the sole committer, and giving it
a surface makes it a builder that can also merge.
- **One file owns each class of fact.** Everything else derives from it, or the two copies
diverge and nobody notices which is stale.
- **Never remove a shared-core export because it looks unused.** You cannot see the consumers
from inside the core. Deprecate, announce, then remove.
## This repository's own log
`docs/DECISION-LOG.md` is the live instance of the decision log described in the playbook. When a
decision is raised, assign it the next number immediately — before it is answered — and give it
lettered options with an explicit recommendation. Never renumber, never reuse a number, and record
resolutions in place rather than deleting them.
## Never
- Add an agent before the surface it will own exists. The map comes first, the agent second.
- Let two agents hold a write claim on the same path. Overlap resolves itself as a race.
- Hand-edit a generated artifact instead of the source it derives from.
- Skip the guard because the change is small. Small changes are how surfaces drift.
## References
- `references/playbook.md` — the full 415-line playbook: surface splitting, the guard, the
registry, the decision log, anti-patterns with their failure modes, sizing, multi-repo and
shared-core layouts, the charter format, and a day-one checklist.
- `references/starter-rosters.md` — concrete rosters for a mobile-app portfolio, a game
portfolio, and a shared core, with producer/auditor pairings.
- `references/bootstrap-prompt.md` — a fill-in-the-blanks prompt for standing this up in a
fresh session against a target repo.
- `scripts/agent-guard.mjs` — the executable guard. No dependencies, Node 18+.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!