Designs royalty and streaming agreements with volume projections, delivery schedules, and implied return analysis. Use when structuring royalty deals, analyzing stream economics, or evaluating passive resource exposure.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CaseMark/skills --skill structuring-royalty-and-streaming-deals --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Structuring Royalty And Streaming Deals?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/casemark-structuring-royalty-and-streaming-deals)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: structuring-royalty-and-streaming-deals
language: en
description: Designs royalty and streaming agreements with volume projections, delivery schedules, and implied return analysis. Use when structuring royalty deals, analyzing stream economics, or evaluating passive resource exposure.
tags:
- real-assets-and-natural-resources
metadata:
author: casemark
practice_areas:
- Natural Resources
- Energy Capital
- Commodity Investment
document_types:
- Report
skill_modes:
- Analysis
---
# Structuring Royalty And Streaming Deals
Designs royalty and streaming agreements with volume projections, delivery schedules, and implied return analysis.
## When To Use
- Structuring a new royalty or streaming transaction on a producing or development-stage asset
- Evaluating an existing royalty/stream for acquisition, sale, or restructuring
- Comparing royalty economics (NSR, GOR, NPI, overriding royalty) against streaming economics (fixed delivery price per unit)
- Modeling implied returns and breakeven scenarios for passive resource exposure
- Advising on deal terms such as upfront deposit size, delivery thresholds, step-downs, and price participation mechanisms
## Inputs To Gather
- **Asset profile**: commodity type (precious metals, base metals, oil & gas, bulk minerals), mine/well stage (producing, development, exploration), jurisdiction
- **Reserve and resource estimates**: proven/probable reserves, measured/indicated/inferred resources, expected mine life or well decline curve
- **Production forecast**: annual volume projections by commodity, ramp-up schedule, sustaining capex assumptions
- **Royalty or stream terms**: royalty rate or stream percentage, upfront deposit amount, ongoing per-unit cash payment (streams), minimum delivery commitments, make-whole or clawback provisions
- **Commodity price assumptions**: spot prices, forward curve, long-term consensus forecasts
- **Operating cost data**: cash costs, all-in sustaining costs (AISC), operator breakeven price
- **Discount rate / hurdle rate**: investor required return, comparable transaction benchmarks
- **Tax and withholding**: applicable royalty tax treatment, withholding rates on cross-border payments [VERIFY]
## Workflow
1. **Classify the instrument** — Distinguish between royalty types (NSR, GOR, NPI, overriding royalty) and streaming agreements. Identify whether the deal is on a single asset, portfolio, or corporate-level interest. Flag hybrid structures (e.g., royalty with stream conversion option).
2. **Build the production model** — Construct annual production volumes using the operator's mine plan or decline-curve analysis. Apply recovery rates, grade assumptions, and processing factors. Stress-test with low/mid/high production scenarios.
3. **Model cash flows to the royalty/stream holder** — For royalties: apply the royalty rate to projected revenue (NSR) or gross output (GOR) net of allowable deductions. For streams: calculate delivered ounces/barrels at the stream percentage, subtract the ongoing per-unit cash cost, and apply commodity price assumptions. Include minimum delivery obligations and make-whole provisions if applicable.
4. **Calculate implied returns** — Compute IRR, NPV, and payback period on the upfront deposit or acquisition price. Run sensitivity tables across commodity price (+/− 20%), production volume (+/− 15%), and discount rate (6%–12%). Identify the breakeven commodity price for target return thresholds.
5. **Assess delivery and credit risk** — Evaluate operator financial health, counterparty credit, and completion risk for development-stage assets. Review security packages (offtake liens, step-in rights, insurance requirements). Flag concentration risk if the stream depends on a single mine or well.
6. **Benchmark against comparables** — Compare implied yield and upfront cost-per-reserve-unit to recent royalty/stream transactions. Reference public comps from Franco-Nevada, Wheaton Precious Metals, Royal Gold, Osisko, or analogous energy royalty companies. Note premium or discount to market and explain drivers.
7. **Draft term sheet or deal memo** — Summarize the proposed structure: upfront consideration, delivery schedule, ongoing cash payment, step-downs, price participation, anti-dilution provisions, area-of-interest clauses, and termination triggers. Include a recommendation on deal attractiveness with supporting return metrics.
## Output
A structured deal analysis report containing:
- **Executive summary**: deal type, commodity, asset stage, headline return metrics (IRR, NPV, payback)
- **Production and delivery schedule**: annual volumes in tabular format with scenario bands
- **Cash flow waterfall**: year-by-year revenue to the royalty/stream holder under base, upside, and stress cases
- **Return sensitivity matrix**: IRR across commodity price and production volume combinations
- **Comparable transaction table**: recent deals with implied yield, cost per reserve ounce/barrel, and premium/discount
- **Risk register**: key risks (geological, operational, counterparty, commodity price, jurisdictional/regulatory) with mitigation notes
- **Recommended term sheet**: proposed commercial terms with rationale for each material provision
## Quality Checks
- Verify that production volumes reconcile to the operator's published reserve/resource statement
- Confirm royalty rate or stream percentage matches the proposed term sheet — not a placeholder
- Ensure commodity price assumptions are sourced (forward curve date, consensus provider) and not stale
- Check that IRR and NPV calculations use consistent discounting conventions (mid-year vs. end-of-year)
- Validate that allowable deductions for NSR royalties match the contractual definition, not a generic industry assumption [VERIFY]
- Confirm tax treatment of royalty income vs. stream income in the relevant jurisdiction [VERIFY]
- Flag any minimum delivery shortfall scenarios and confirm the make-whole mechanics are correctly modeled
- Mark all jurisdiction-specific regulatory requirements (mining royalty regimes, export duties, indigenous royalty obligations) with [VERIFY]
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!