Builds SOTP valuations for conglomerates and multi-segment companies with segment-appropriate methodologies. Use when valuing diversified companies, calculating conglomerate discounts, or modeling segment breakups.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CaseMark/skills --skill modeling-sum-of-parts-valuations --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Modeling Sum Of Parts Valuations?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/casemark-modeling-sum-of-parts-valuations)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: modeling-sum-of-parts-valuations
language: en
description: Builds SOTP valuations for conglomerates and multi-segment companies with segment-appropriate methodologies. Use when valuing diversified companies, calculating conglomerate discounts, or modeling segment breakups.
tags:
- modeling
- equity-research
- valuation
metadata:
author: casemark
practice_areas:
- Equity Research
- Investment Management
document_types:
- Financial Model
skill_modes:
- Modeling
- Forecasting
---
# Modeling Sum Of Parts Valuations
## When To Use
- Valuing conglomerates or diversified companies operating across distinct business segments (e.g., GE, Berkshire Hathaway, Siemens)
- Quantifying conglomerate discount or premium versus pure-play peers
- Modeling spin-off, divestiture, or breakup scenarios to estimate unlock value
- Stress-testing whether a company trades at a discount to intrinsic segment-level value
- Supporting activist investor theses or strategic review recommendations
## Inputs To Gather
- **Segment financials**: Revenue, EBITDA, EBIT, and capital expenditures per reportable segment from 10-K/annual report segment disclosures (typically 3-5 years of history)
- **Corporate/unallocated costs**: Central overhead, shared services, and elimination entries not assigned to segments
- **Segment-specific comps**: Pure-play comparable company sets for each segment with current trading multiples (EV/EBITDA, EV/Revenue, P/E as appropriate)
- **Precedent transactions**: Relevant M&A multiples for segments where transaction data is more informative than trading comps
- **DCF inputs** (if applicable): Segment-level WACC components, long-term growth rates, and terminal value assumptions
- **Net debt and adjustments**: Total consolidated net debt, pension liabilities, minority interests, equity method investments, NOLs, and other non-operating assets/liabilities
- **Conglomerate discount benchmarks**: Historical discount ranges for the specific industry mix [VERIFY: discount ranges vary by market cycle and region]
## Workflow
1. **Map reportable segments** — Identify each operating segment from SEC filings or annual reports. Reconcile segment totals to consolidated financials. Flag any "Other/Corporate" residual bucket and determine whether it contains operating businesses or only overhead.
2. **Select valuation methodology per segment** — Assign the most appropriate method to each segment:
- **EV/EBITDA comps**: Default for mature, cash-generative segments with clear pure-play peers
- **EV/Revenue comps**: Use for high-growth or pre-profit segments (SaaS, biotech pipelines)
- **DCF**: Use when segment has unique growth profile with no close comps, or for regulated utilities/infrastructure
- **NAV/book value**: Use for financial services segments, real estate portfolios, or investment holding segments
- **Precedent transactions**: Layer in when recent M&A provides more relevant pricing than trading comps
3. **Build pure-play comp sets** — For each segment, identify 4-8 publicly traded comparables. Screen for business model alignment, geographic mix, margin profile, and growth stage. Calculate median and mean multiples; document outlier exclusions.
4. **Calculate segment enterprise values** — Apply selected multiples to forward segment metrics (NTM EBITDA, revenue, etc.). Produce low/mid/high range using 25th percentile, median, and 75th percentile of comp set. For DCF segments, build a 5-year explicit forecast with terminal value.
5. **Allocate corporate costs** — Decide treatment of unallocated corporate overhead:
- **Capitalize as negative value**: Apply a corporate overhead multiple (typically 6-8x) to annual unallocated costs
- **Allocate pro-rata to segments**: Distribute to segments by revenue or headcount share before applying multiples
- Document which approach is used and why — this choice materially impacts the result
6. **Bridge to equity value** — Sum segment enterprise values, subtract net debt, adjust for minority interests (at fair value, not book), add equity method investments and other non-operating assets (excess cash, NOL value, real estate). Divide by diluted share count for per-share implied value.
7. **Calculate conglomerate discount/premium** — Compare implied SOTP equity value to current market capitalization. Express as percentage discount or premium. Benchmark against historical trading range and sector-typical conglomerate discounts [VERIFY: typical conglomerate discounts range 10-25% but vary significantly by region and sector].
8. **Run sensitivity analysis** — Build a matrix showing implied equity value across:
- Multiple ranges (±1-2 turns of EBITDA) per segment
- Varying corporate cost treatment
- Different terminal growth or WACC assumptions for DCF segments
- Scenario toggle for full breakup vs. partial divestiture
## Output
- **SOTP summary table**: Segment name | Metric used | Metric value | Multiple range (low/mid/high) | Implied EV range per segment
- **Corporate adjustments bridge**: Unallocated costs, net debt, minority interests, non-operating assets, share count
- **Implied equity value**: Per-share range (low/mid/high) with current price reference and implied upside/downside
- **Conglomerate discount analysis**: Current implied discount vs. historical range
- **Comp set detail**: Per-segment comparable companies with key financial metrics and selected multiples
- **Sensitivity tables**: 2-way matrices for key segment multiple and cost assumption toggles
- **Methodology notes**: Rationale for methodology selection per segment, key assumptions, and data sources
## Quality Checks
- Segment EV values sum correctly and reconcile with adjustments to total implied equity value
- Each segment's applied multiple falls within the documented comp set range — no cherry-picked outliers
- Corporate unallocated costs are fully accounted for (not inadvertently dropped)
- Net debt figure matches most recent balance sheet and includes off-balance-sheet items (operating leases if pre-IFRS 16, pension deficits)
- Diluted share count includes in-the-money options and convertibles using treasury stock method
- Implied per-share value range is internally consistent across low/mid/high (no crossed ranges)
- Conglomerate discount calculation uses consistent EV-to-equity bridge
- All externally sourced multiples and financial data include as-of dates
- Mark any segment with fewer than 3 pure-play comps with [VERIFY] for reliability
- Cross-check SOTP implied value against consolidated DCF or comparable company analysis for reasonableness
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!