Generates structured summaries of military law matters including courts-martial, UCMJ disciplinary actions, administrative separations, and appellate decisions. Trigger when a user needs a reference summary of a military justice proceeding, CAAF/CCA opinion, Article 15 action, or service regulation issue for JAG officers, command staff, or military legal practitioners.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CaseMark/skills --skill military-law-summary --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Military Law Summary?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/casemark-military-law-summary)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: military-law-summary
language: en
description: Generates structured summaries of military law matters including courts-martial, UCMJ disciplinary actions, administrative separations, and appellate decisions. Trigger when a user needs a reference summary of a military justice proceeding, CAAF/CCA opinion, Article 15 action, or service regulation issue for JAG officers, command staff, or military legal practitioners.
tags:
- analysis
- litigation
- summarization
- summary
---
# Military Law Summary
Produces a standalone structured summary of a military law matter — court-martial, disciplinary action, regulatory issue, or appellate decision — for JAG officers, command staff, and practitioners.
## Quick Start
1. Collect source materials: court-martial decisions, appellate opinions (CAAF, service CCAs), UCMJ provisions, MCM guidance, administrative records, or service regulations.
2. Identify matter details: service branch, rank/status, proceeding type (Article 15, summary/special/general court-martial, admin separation, appellate review).
3. Produce the summary using the output structure below.
## Output Structure
### 1. Header Block
| Field | Content |
|---|---|
| Matter | Case name or regulatory matter identifier |
| Service Branch | Army / Navy / Air Force / Marines / Coast Guard / Space Force |
| Personnel | Rank, status, role |
| Proceeding Type | Article 15 / Summary CM / Special CM / General CM / Admin separation / Appellate review / Regulatory |
| UCMJ Articles | Charged articles (e.g., Art. 120, Art. 134) |
| Disposition Date | Date of decision or action |
| Reviewing Authority | CAAF / Service CCA / Convening authority / Other |
### 2. Factual Background
- Core facts in chronological order
- Relevant military context (unit, deployment status, command relationship)
- Nature of alleged offenses or regulatory issues
### 3. Procedural History
- Charges preferred and referred; forum and plea
- Findings by article and specification
- Sentence imposed
- Post-trial convening authority action
- Appellate history (CCA, CAAF, Supreme Court if applicable)
### 4. Legal Analysis
Per significant issue:
- **Issue**: Framed as a question
- **Standard of review**: De novo, abuse of discretion, factual sufficiency, etc.
- **Controlling authority**: UCMJ article, MCM provision, binding precedent
- **Reasoning**: How authority was applied to facts
- **Holding**: Outcome
- **Dissents/concurrences**: Key reasoning if any
Note divergence from civilian criminal law where relevant.
### 5. Elements and Evidence (Offense Cases)
| Element | Evidence Presented | Sufficiency |
|---|---|---|
| {Element} | {Key evidence} | Met / Not met |
### 6. Administrative Matters (If Applicable)
- Applicable standard (characterization of service, fitness-for-duty, clearance adjudication)
- Deference afforded to military decision-makers
- Collateral consequences: benefits, veteran status, employment impact
### 7. Practical Implications
- Effect on future practice and command guidance
- Changes to established precedent
- Unresolved questions or anticipated developments
- Actionable takeaways for advisors and commanders
## Pitfalls and Checks
- **Citations**: Use standard military format — UCMJ articles (Art. 32, UCMJ), MCM rules (R.C.M. 1001), CAAF opinions (*United States v. Smith*, 80 M.J. 200 (C.A.A.F. 2020)). Mark unverified citations with `[VERIFY]`.
- **Do not conflate with civilian procedure**: Military justice is a distinct framework. Flag where military due process diverges (command influence, military judge authority, unlawful command influence).
- **Phase awareness**: Identify pre-trial, trial, post-trial/clemency, or appellate posture and tailor analysis accordingly.
- **Constitutional rights in military context**: Address Art. 31(b) vs. Miranda, search authorization vs. warrant (4th Amend.), First Amendment limits for service members.
- **Neutral posture**: Do not advocate; summarize analytically.
- **Standalone completeness**: Summary must be usable without the underlying source documents.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!