Produces structured U.S. transactional due diligence summaries with risk ratings, document citations, and follow-up actions. Triggers when the user requests a due diligence summary, diligence report, red-flag memo, or data room analysis for M&A, investment, or partnership transactions.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CaseMark/skills --skill due-diligence-summary --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Due Diligence Summary?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/casemark-due-diligence-summary)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: due-diligence-summary
language: en
description: Produces structured U.S. transactional due diligence summaries with risk ratings, document citations, and follow-up actions. Triggers when the user requests a due diligence summary, diligence report, red-flag memo, or data room analysis for M&A, investment, or partnership transactions.
tags:
- analysis
- corporate
- summarization
- transactional
---
# Due Diligence Summary
Decision-ready diligence summary with risk ratings, evidence citations, and next-step actions for U.S. transactional matters.
---
## Related skills
- **Environmental subset** — `phase-i-esa` for ASTM E1527-21 site assessments; `environmental-regulation-summaries` for governing-statute identification; `environmental-indemnity` and `environmental-covenant-and-easement` for risk-allocation drafting.
- **Real estate subset** — `real-estate-transaction-summary` for property-transaction memos that include diligence; `title-commitment` for title-side review.
- **Corporate subset** — `corporate-bylaws`, `articles-of-incorporation`, `pro-forma-cap-table` for governance review.
- **Compliance subset** — `compliance-summaries` for cross-sector regulatory posture; `hipaa-baa` and related healthcare skills for HIPAA-regulated targets.
- **Outputs** — `legal-memo` for substantive opinions arising from diligence findings; `engagement-letter-review` for scope confirmation upstream.
## Quick Start
Gather before beginning:
1. **Transaction snapshot** — type, parties, structure, timeline, target entities
2. **Scope definition** — in/out-of-scope categories, materiality threshold, jurisdictions
3. **Data room index** — document list with stable IDs and dates
4. **Substantive materials** — governance docs, financials, contracts, IP schedules, litigation files, HR/benefits, real estate, tax, environmental records
5. **Privilege/confidentiality designation** and allowed audience
## Workflow
1. **Map scope to inventory** — mark each category Complete / Partial / Missing using the coverage checklist.
2. **Extract findings** — facts, obligations, restrictions, change-of-control and consent triggers.
3. **Classify** each finding as Fact, Representation, or Open Issue.
4. **Rate risk and materiality** — quantify exposure where possible.
5. **Flag conflicts** across sources; resolve by authority and date.
6. **Produce summary** using the deliverable template; cite every material finding as `[Doc ID or Title, date, page/section]`.
### Risk Scale
| Rating | Meaning | Action |
|--------|---------|--------|
| High | Likely deal impact or material exposure | Escalate; require resolution/mitigation |
| Medium | Manageable; needs diligence or contractual protection | Track; address in docs/price |
| Low | Informational or minor exposure | Note; monitor if cumulative |
### Coverage Checklist
| Category | Expected Core Docs |
|----------|--------------------|
| Corporate/Governance | Charter, bylaws, consents, cap table, subsidiary org |
| Financials/Debt | Audited/unaudited FS, debt docs, guarantees, liens |
| Contracts | Top customer/vendor, assignment/consent, exclusivity |
| IP/Tech | IP schedule, licenses, OSS use, assignments |
| Litigation/Reg | Docket list, claims history, agency letters |
| HR/Benefits | Payroll, key employee agreements, benefits plans |
| Real Estate/Assets | Leases, deeds, asset schedules |
| Tax | Returns, audits, NOLs, nexus |
| Environmental | Phase I ESA (ASTM E1527-21), Phase II reports, environmental permits (NPDES, Title V, RCRA), CERCLA / state cleanup status, environmental indemnity provisions, ECOAs, PFAS exposure, reportable historical releases |
## Deliverable Template
### Executive Summary
- Deal snapshot (type, parties, target, valuation if known)
- Top 5 red flags with risk rating and cited evidence
- Missing critical items
### Scope & Coverage
- In-scope categories and jurisdictions
- Coverage checklist with gaps and rationale
### Key Findings by Category
One table per category (Corporate/Governance, Financials/Debt, Contracts, IP/Tech, Litigation/Regulatory, HR/Benefits, Real Estate/Assets, Tax, Environmental):
| Issue | Evidence | Risk | Materiality | Follow-up |
|-------|----------|------|-------------|-----------|
### Conflicts & Discrepancies
| Topic | Conflicting Sources | Assessment | Action |
|-------|---------------------|------------|--------|
### Open Items / Follow-Up Requests
| Item | Rationale | Requested From | Priority |
|------|-----------|----------------|----------|
### Recommended Actions
- Contractual protections (rep, warranty, indemnity, covenants)
- Price or structure adjustments
- Pre-closing conditions or consents
## Pitfalls & Checks
- Separate confirmed facts from representations and open issues — never conflate.
- Flag missing expected documents as findings with risk and impact.
- Use exact dates, parties, dollar amounts, and governing law when available.
- Label unsigned drafts as non-authoritative.
- For regulated industries, add a compliance subsection (HIPAA, FDA, FINRA/SEC, OFAC, FCPA, state licensing); mark statutes `[VERIFY]` if uncertain.
- Stay neutral and evidence-driven — do not advocate for or against the deal.
- Preserve privilege and confidentiality; limit distribution as instructed.
---
## Troubleshooting
- **Data room incomplete or actively being populated.** Mark each missing-document line as a finding (Risk: Medium-High depending on category) with a follow-up request. A summary built on a partial data room is signed only with explicit scope limitation in the Executive Summary.
- **Source documents conflict (e.g., cap table vs. board consents).** Show both readings side-by-side with citations; flag for resolution by counsel. Do not silently reconcile by date — older documents may control where amendments aren't on file.
- **Regulated-industry target without familiar compliance lens.** Engage industry-specific counsel; flag and rate Unknown-but-material rather than guessing. Examples: HIPAA covered-entity status; banking BSA/AML; broker-dealer registration.
- **Environmental concerns surfaced but no Phase I in the data room.** Risk is Medium-to-High depending on industrial use history. Recommend a Phase I ESA per ASTM E1527-21 as a closing condition or pre-LOI step, and an environmental indemnity in the definitive agreement.
- **Privilege risk on shared diligence.** When buyer's counsel and seller's counsel share substantive analysis, joint-defense / common-interest agreements are the usual mechanism. Note any unprivileged exchanges in the deliverable.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!