Generates topic-based deposition summaries for commercial litigation with exhibit cross-referencing. Produces a two-column table (page:line | neutral summary) with embedded exhibit citations. Use when summarizing depositions, creating deposition digests, indexing exhibits, or preparing witness testimony summaries during discovery.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CaseMark/skills --skill deposition-summary --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Deposition Summary?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/casemark-deposition-summary)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: deposition-summary
language: en
description: Generates topic-based deposition summaries for commercial litigation with exhibit cross-referencing. Produces a two-column table (page:line | neutral summary) with embedded exhibit citations. Use when summarizing depositions, creating deposition digests, indexing exhibits, or preparing witness testimony summaries during discovery.
---
# Deposition Summary with Key Document Index
Transforms a deposition transcript into a topic-based summary table with integrated exhibit cross-references for rapid navigation between testimony and documentary evidence.
## Prerequisites
- Complete deposition transcript with page and line numbering
- Exhibit list and files referenced or marked during deposition
- Case context: party names, key contract sections, claims at issue
## Workflow
### 1. Review Transcript
Read the full transcript and identify:
- Natural topic breaks (explicit subject changes and thematic shifts)
- Every exhibit reference — formal ("Exhibit 3") and informal ("the email we just reviewed")
- Key admissions, contradictions, evasive answers, and authentication testimony
### 2. Extract Topics
For each topic, capture:
| Element | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Topic heading | Specific — "Witness Knowledge of Payment Default Under §4.2" not "Payment Issues" |
| Page:line range | Start and end of testimony on that topic |
| Summary | 2-3 sentences, neutral, no legal conclusions |
| Exhibits referenced | Exhibit number + how witness characterized/authenticated it |
| Notable moments | Admissions, contradictions, refusals to answer |
### 3. Build Exhibit Index
Create a master exhibit cross-reference table:
| Exhibit | Description | Transcript Refs (pg:ln) | Witness Characterization |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ex. 1 | [doc type] | 45:3-47:12, 102:8-103:1 | [how witness described it] |
### 4. Assemble Summary Table
Primary deliverable — two-column table:
```
| Transcript Cite | Topic & Summary |
|-----------------|-----------------|
| pp. 12:4-18:22 | **Formation of the Supply Agreement**
| | [2-3 sentence neutral summary]. See Ex. 3
| | (Supply Agreement, discussed at 14:8-15:2).
| | Notable: Witness admitted not reading §4.2
| | before signing (15:18-22). |
```
Within each summary cell:
- Embed exhibit references discussed during that testimony
- Cite specific page:line for key admissions
- Use hierarchical headings for major topics vs. subtopics
### 5. Output
Produce both:
- **DOCX** — formatted table with hyperlinks to exhibits and transcript locations
- **PDF** — preserved hyperlinks, full-text searchable, locked for filing
## Key Rules
- **Neutral tone only** — summarize what the witness said, not what it means for the case
- **Specificity over brevity** — "Witness denied receiving the October 14 demand letter" not "Witness denied receiving correspondence"
- **Organize by substance, not questioner** — consolidate redirect and direct testimony on the same topic under one heading
- **Capture authentication testimony** — note when witness identifies, authenticates, or disputes a document
- **Flag evasive responses** — mark non-responsive answers, memory claims, and qualified answers
## Quality Checklist
- [ ] Every exhibit mentioned in testimony appears in summary and exhibit index
- [ ] No exhibits referenced that weren't actually discussed
- [ ] All page:line citations verified against transcript
- [ ] Summaries reflect actual testimony — no interpretation or legal conclusions
- [ ] Topic headings specific enough for at-a-glance navigation
- [ ] No privileged communications or work product included
- [ ] Hyperlinks resolve to correct targets
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!