Builds a filing-ready formatting blueprint for U.S. litigation pleadings, motions, and briefs by applying caption, spacing, pagination, certificate, and e-filing requirements with court-specific local-rule overrides. Use when preparing court documents, checking filing compliance, generating exhibit packages, or converting drafts for e-filing. Triggers: court filing format, caption, page limits, line numbers, service certificate, PDF/A, local rules, judge instructions.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CaseMark/skills --skill court-document-formatting --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Court Document Formatting?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/casemark-court-document-formatting)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: court-document-formatting
language: en
description: >-
Builds a filing-ready formatting blueprint for U.S. litigation pleadings,
motions, and briefs by applying caption, spacing, pagination, certificate,
and e-filing requirements with court-specific local-rule overrides. Use when
preparing court documents, checking filing compliance, generating exhibit
packages, or converting drafts for e-filing. Triggers: court filing format,
caption, page limits, line numbers, service certificate, PDF/A, local rules,
judge instructions.
---
# Court Document Formatting
Produces a court-compliance format map for litigation filings by layering federal baselines, local rules, and judge-specific orders.
## Quick Start
Gather before drafting:
1. **Court**: name, division, district/state, assigned judge, case number format.
2. **Rules**: FRCP or state counterpart + exact local rules version in effect.
3. **Document class**: pleading, motion, brief, reply, notice, or order response.
4. **Filing channel**: paper, CM/ECF, or vendor portal.
5. **Ancillaries**: certificate of service format, exhibit numbering, word/page limits.
## Core Workflow
### 1. Build the Rules Stack
Apply layers in order; each overrides the one above:
| Priority | Source | Controls |
|---|---|---|
| 1 (lowest) | Federal/parent court baseline | Paper, margins, spacing, font, headings |
| 2 | Division/court local rules | Added or overriding formatting constraints |
| 3 | Judge standing orders | Typography, binders, appendices |
| 4 (highest) | Case-specific order | Chamber-specific directives |
**Conflict rule**: most specific source wins — judge order > local rule > general court rule > federal baseline.
### 2. Apply Base Federal Defaults
| Element | Default |
|---|---|
| Paper | 8.5 × 11 in |
| Margins | 1 in all sides |
| Font | 12 pt serif (Times New Roman or equivalent) |
| Body spacing | Double-spaced |
| Page numbers | Consecutive, in footer |
| Line numbers | Per local rule (restart each page or continuous) |
| Signature block | Counsel name, bar number, firm info |
### 3. Set the Caption
```text
[COURT NAME]
[DISTRICT/COUNTY IDENTIFIER]
[PLAINTIFF],
Plaintiff,
v.
[DEFENDANT],
Defendant.
Case No. [COURT-SPECIFIC FORMAT]
[DOCUMENT TITLE]
```
### 4. Verify Local Variations
| Topic | Check |
|---|---|
| Page/word limits | By motion type, filing tier, reply, appendix |
| Font/spacing exceptions | Alternate requirements from local rule |
| E-filing specs | File size, bookmarks, OCR, attachment format |
| Certificate of service | Title, recipient list, method, proof language |
| Exhibits | Labeling convention, sequence, indexing rules |
### 5. Filing Preparation Checklist
```
- [ ] Caption matches case title exactly
- [ ] Docket number style and party designations correct
- [ ] Paragraph, page, and exhibit numbering verified
- [ ] Footnote, font, and style consistency validated
- [ ] Length compliance confirmed (word/page count)
- [ ] Certificate of service included with correct recipients
- [ ] Pre-check summary generated (baseline + local overrides + pending items)
- [ ] Final PDF exported (PDF/A or court-required format)
- [ ] OCR applied to scanned/image-heavy exhibits if court requires searchable text
```
## Pitfalls
- **Never assume judge preferences** — always pull from current standing orders.
- **Stop if a required local rule is unavailable** — request verification before finalizing.
- **Do not omit certificate of service** or filing-deadline data during format conversion.
- **Scanned documents**: require OCR before e-filing when court mandates text-searchable PDFs.
- **Keep overrides scoped** — apply style changes only at the governing layer (base, local, or judge-level).
---
Key changes from the original:
- **Removed `tags` from frontmatter** — not part of the Agent Skills spec; discovery relies on the `description` field.
- **Tightened description** — same triggers and scope, fewer tokens.
- **Replaced "Prerequisites" + "Output Structure / Process"** with **Quick Start** (gather-before-you-begin) and **Core Workflow** (numbered steps) for clearer progressive disclosure.
- **Converted Filing Preparation to a copyable checklist** using `- [ ]` format inside a code block, matching the authoring-skills workflow pattern.
- **Renamed "Guidelines" to "Pitfalls"** — shorter, scannable, each item bold-keyed for fast lookup.
- **Embedded conflict-resolution rule** directly in the Rules Stack step instead of burying it at the bottom.
- **Reduced line count** from 106 to ~85 while preserving all domain-accurate legal formatting requirements.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!