Constructs plan of reorganization models with debt-for-equity conversion, new money injection, and emergence capital structure. Use when modeling restructuring plans, designing emergence capital structures, or analyzing plan feasibility.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CaseMark/skills --skill building-restructuring-plan-models --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Building Restructuring Plan Models?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/casemark-building-restructuring-plan-models)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: building-restructuring-plan-models
language: en
description: Constructs plan of reorganization models with debt-for-equity conversion, new money injection, and emergence capital structure. Use when modeling restructuring plans, designing emergence capital structures, or analyzing plan feasibility.
tags:
- modeling
- distressed-and-restructuring
metadata:
author: casemark
practice_areas:
- Restructuring
- Distressed Investing
- Turnaround
document_types:
- Model
skill_modes:
- Modeling
---
# Building Restructuring Plan Models
## When To Use
- Modeling a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization or out-of-court exchange offer
- Designing the emergence capital structure (debt/equity split post-restructuring)
- Analyzing creditor recovery waterfalls under competing plan proposals
- Evaluating debt-for-equity conversion ratios and new money injection terms
- Testing plan feasibility against projected cash flows and coverage covenants
## Inputs To Gather
- **Pre-petition capital structure**: All tranches of debt (revolver, term loans, bonds, mezz, sub debt) with face values, accrued interest, maturity dates, coupon rates, and security/priority
- **Claims register or estimated claims**: Administrative claims, priority claims, secured claims, unsecured claims, intercompany claims, equity interests
- **Enterprise valuation**: Reorganization value (DCF, comparable company, precedent transactions) with low/mid/high range
- **Projected financials**: 3–5 year post-emergence revenue, EBITDA, capex, working capital, and free cash flow projections
- **Plan term sheet**: Proposed treatment of each class — reinstatement, paydown, debt-for-equity swap, rights offering, new money terms
- **New money details**: DIP-to-exit conversion terms, rights offering size and backstop, exit facility commitments, fees
- **Tax attributes**: NOL carryforwards, Section 382 limitations, cancellation-of-debt income estimates [VERIFY against debtor's tax advisors]
## Workflow
1. **Map the pre-petition capital structure**
- List each tranche with principal, accrued/unpaid interest, applicable premiums, and priority ranking
- Identify the fulcrum security (tranche where value breaks) based on enterprise valuation range
- Calculate total allowed claims per class including make-whole or prepayment penalties [VERIFY claim allowance assumptions with counsel]
2. **Build the recovery waterfall**
- Allocate reorganization value top-down by absolute priority: administrative → secured → unsecured → equity
- For each class, compute recovery as percentage of allowed claim
- Model alternative distributions if the plan proposes deviations from absolute priority (cramdown scenarios) [VERIFY cramdown requirements under Section 1129(b)]
3. **Model debt-for-equity conversion**
- Define conversion mechanics: what percentage of new equity each converting class receives
- Calculate implied equity value per share at emergence based on reorganization value minus new exit debt
- Compute dilution from management incentive plan (MIP), typically 5–15% of emergence equity, with strike prices and vesting
- Show pre- and post-dilution ownership tables for all stakeholder classes
4. **Structure new money and exit facilities**
- Model rights offering: size, subscription price (discount to plan equity value), backstop commitment fee, and resulting pro forma ownership
- Build exit facility assumptions: revolver size, term loan tranches, coupon (fixed vs. floating), amortization schedule, maturity
- Calculate total emergence debt and resulting credit metrics: Total Debt/EBITDA, Net Debt/EBITDA, Interest Coverage, Fixed Charge Coverage
- Benchmark emergence leverage against comparable restructurings in the sector
5. **Run feasibility and sensitivity analysis**
- Project debt service (interest + mandatory amortization) against free cash flow for 3–5 years post-emergence
- Test the "feasibility" standard: confirm the reorganized entity is not likely to require further restructuring [VERIFY Section 1129(a)(11) feasibility requirements]
- Run sensitivities on enterprise value (±10–20%), EBITDA margins, revenue growth, and exit multiples
- Show recovery sensitivity tables for each class across valuation scenarios
6. **Compile plan comparison (if applicable)**
- If multiple competing plans, build side-by-side recovery comparison
- Highlight key differences: implied equity value, creditor recoveries, governance terms, timeline to emergence
- Flag which classes are impaired and expected to vote for/against each plan
## Output
- **Emergence capital structure summary**: Table showing each tranche of exit debt and equity, with amounts, rates, maturities, and key terms
- **Creditor recovery waterfall**: Class-by-class recovery percentages at low/mid/high valuations
- **Ownership table**: Pro forma equity ownership at emergence — converting creditors, new money investors, MIP reserve, existing equity (if any recovery)
- **Credit metrics dashboard**: Emergence leverage, coverage ratios, and liquidity position
- **Sensitivity tables**: Recovery and leverage sensitivities across valuation and operating scenarios
- **Feasibility check**: Cash flow vs. debt service projection confirming plan viability
## Quality Checks
- Confirm total distributed value (debt + equity + cash) equals reorganization value — no value leakage
- Verify recovery waterfall respects absolute priority unless cramdown is explicitly modeled and justified
- Cross-check emergence leverage against sector norms and lender underwriting thresholds (typically 3.0–5.0x Total Debt/EBITDA)
- Ensure MIP dilution is applied consistently across all ownership calculations
- Validate that rights offering proceeds plus exit facility commitments cover all cash-pay claims and emergence liquidity needs
- Confirm NOL/tax attribute treatment is flagged for specialist review [VERIFY Section 382 limitation calculations]
- Test that model balances: sources of funds (new debt + new equity + asset value) = uses of funds (claim payments + fees + cash to balance sheet)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!