Evaluates insurance company investment portfolios with ALM considerations and regulatory constraints. Use when analyzing insurer investments, managing ALM, or evaluating portfolio compliance.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CaseMark/skills --skill analyzing-insurance-investments --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Analyzing Insurance Investments?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/casemark-analyzing-insurance-investments)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: analyzing-insurance-investments
language: en
description: Evaluates insurance company investment portfolios with ALM considerations and regulatory constraints. Use when analyzing insurer investments, managing ALM, or evaluating portfolio compliance.
tags:
- analysis
- insurance
- compliance
- regulatory
metadata:
author: casemark
practice_areas:
- Insurance
- Actuarial Science
- Reinsurance
document_types:
- Analysis Report
skill_modes:
- Analysis
---
# Analyzing Insurance Investments
Evaluates insurance company investment portfolios with asset-liability management (ALM) considerations, statutory accounting constraints, and regulatory capital implications.
## When To Use
- Reviewing an insurer's invested asset portfolio for concentration risk, credit quality, or duration mismatch
- Assessing ALM alignment between policy liabilities (reserves) and supporting investment assets
- Evaluating compliance with state investment statutes or NAIC model investment law limits
- Analyzing portfolio impact on risk-based capital (RBC) ratios or BCAR/AM Best scores
- Comparing portfolio allocation against peer insurers or rating agency benchmarks
- Reviewing reinsurer collateral trusts or funds-withheld asset pools
## Inputs To Gather
- **Schedule D / Schedule DA filings** — statutory investment schedules from the insurer's annual or quarterly statement
- **Investment policy statement (IPS)** — board-approved guidelines on asset classes, credit quality floors, duration bands, and concentration limits
- **Liability profile** — reserve breakdown by line of business, loss payout patterns, and duration of liabilities
- **RBC filing or capital model output** — C-1 (asset risk) and C-3 (interest rate risk) factor charges [VERIFY: confirm whether entity is life, P&C, or health — RBC formulas differ]
- **Rating agency criteria** — AM Best BCAR, S&P capital model, or Moody's requirements applicable to the entity
- **Domiciliary state investment statute** — quantitative limits on asset classes, single-issuer caps, and admitted/non-admitted asset rules [VERIFY: varies by state of domicile]
- **Current yield curve and market data** — for mark-to-market analysis of unrealized gains/losses
## Workflow
1. **Map the portfolio** — Categorize holdings by NAIC asset class designation (1–6 for bonds, common/preferred stock, mortgage loans, real estate, alternatives). Calculate percentage allocation to each class.
2. **Assess credit quality distribution** — Tabulate bond holdings by NAIC designation and equivalent rating (NAIC 1 = A or better, NAIC 2 = BBB, etc.). Flag any NAIC 3–6 concentrations exceeding IPS limits.
3. **Perform duration/cash-flow analysis** — Compare effective duration of invested assets against estimated duration of liabilities. Identify duration gap and convexity mismatch. For life insurers, check key-rate duration buckets. [VERIFY: for P&C, loss reserve payout patterns may substitute for traditional duration analysis]
4. **Test statutory concentration limits** — Check single-issuer exposure, sector concentration, and asset-class caps against domiciliary state statute and NAIC model law benchmarks (e.g., typically 3–5% of admitted assets per issuer for bonds). [VERIFY: state-specific limits]
5. **Calculate RBC impact** — Apply C-1 risk factors to each asset holding. Identify the largest capital charges and assess whether portfolio reallocation could improve the RBC ratio. For life companies, run C-3 Phase I/II interest rate scenarios if applicable.
6. **Evaluate ALM alignment** — Overlay liability cash flows against asset cash flows under base and stress scenarios (e.g., +/- 100–300 bps parallel shift, steepener/flattener). Quantify surplus volatility.
7. **Benchmark against peers** — Compare allocation percentages, credit quality mix, and yield to similar-sized carriers in the same line of business using NAIC aggregate data or SNL/S&P Capital IQ.
8. **Identify findings and recommendations** — Summarize concentration risks, ALM mismatches, statutory compliance gaps, and capital efficiency opportunities.
## Output
Structure the analysis report with these sections:
- **Executive Summary** — Key findings, portfolio size, overall credit quality, and ALM posture in 3–5 bullet points
- **Portfolio Composition** — Table showing asset class breakdown (bonds, equities, mortgage loans, real estate, alternatives, cash) with dollar amounts and percentages
- **Credit Quality Profile** — Distribution by NAIC designation with comparison to IPS minimums and peer averages
- **Duration & ALM Analysis** — Asset vs. liability duration, gap analysis, and surplus sensitivity to rate scenarios
- **Statutory Compliance Review** — Pass/fail table for each applicable investment statute limit (single issuer, asset class caps, foreign investment, below-investment-grade aggregate)
- **RBC / Capital Impact** — C-1 charges by asset bucket, total asset risk charge, and modeled impact of proposed reallocations
- **Recommendations** — Prioritized list of portfolio actions (e.g., reduce NAIC 3+ exposure, extend/shorten duration, diversify sector concentration)
## Quality Checks
- Confirm all holdings sum to the total invested assets figure on the balance sheet — reconcile any discrepancies before proceeding
- Verify NAIC designations match SVO-assigned ratings (not issuer ratings) for privately placed bonds [VERIFY: check if any holdings received NAIC filing-exempt treatment]
- Ensure duration calculations use option-adjusted duration for callable bonds and mortgage-backed securities, not Macaulay duration
- Cross-check statutory limits against the correct state code — do not assume NAIC model law applies without confirming adoption [VERIFY: domiciliary state statute version]
- Flag any affiliated-party investments and confirm they comply with holding company act restrictions
- Mark all jurisdiction-dependent thresholds and regulatory references with [VERIFY] for manual confirmation
- Confirm that any reinsurer trust assets analyzed are valued on a statutory (not GAAP) basis unless otherwise specified
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!