Use when implementing a complete feature end-to-end, adaptively sequencing understand, requirements, plan, design, build, test, and review stages based on existing definition.
Scanned 9/22/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add caongocquy/showdar-skills --skill showdar-feature --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Showdar Feature?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/caongocquy-showdar-feature)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: showdar-feature
description: Use when implementing a complete feature end-to-end, adaptively sequencing understand, requirements, plan, design, build, test, and review stages based on existing definition.
---
# Showdar Feature
## Purpose
- Implement a complete feature end-to-end by sequencing primitive skills.
- Select only the stages the current evidence actually requires.
- Skip defined, trivial, or decision-free stages instead of running a fixed pipeline.
- Hand work to one primitive at a time; load the next primitive only when needed.
## When to use
- The user asks to implement a complete feature or change spanning multiple lifecycle stages.
- Whole-task intent exists: discovery plus definition plus implementation plus verification.
- Examples: "add user search", "implement checkout flow", "build the export feature".
## When not to use
- Single primitive intent stays primitive: "review this diff" stays `showdar-review`, "run tests" stays `showdar-test`, "why does this crash" stays `showdar-debug` unless the user asks to fix it end-to-end.
- A request that is only diagnosis, only planning, or only review is not this workflow.
- Once this workflow is active, do not spawn another parent workflow unless the request contains a genuinely separate workflow task.
- This workflow never recursively invokes itself.
## Inputs and assumptions
- User outcome in their own words.
- Current repository conventions and change surface are discoverable.
- Authority comes from the existing Phase 6G engine; this workflow consumes authority results and never mints authority.
- Candidate stages: `showdar-understand`, `showdar-requirements`, `showdar-plan`, `showdar-design`, `showdar-build`, `showdar-test`, `showdar-review`.
## Non-negotiable rules
- This workflow does not grant extra authority. Deployment requires explicit authority.
- Ops is NOT implied by feature work.
- Never skip verification merely to move faster.
- Security may load as an orthogonal primitive (`showdar-security`) when the change touches auth, secrets, trust boundaries, or exposure.
- Stop when required evidence is missing instead of guessing.
## Workflow
### Phase 1 — determine needed stages
- Start with `showdar-understand` when the repository, architecture, or impact is unfamiliar.
- Skip requirements if behavior is already sufficiently defined.
- Skip plan for genuinely focused or local work.
- Skip design when no meaningful architecture, UX, or interface decision exists.
- Small well-defined change: understand, then `showdar-build`, then `showdar-test`, then `showdar-review`.
- Undefined feature: understand, then `showdar-requirements`, then `showdar-plan`, then `showdar-build`, then `showdar-test`, then `showdar-review`.
- Architecture or UI-sensitive feature: understand, then `showdar-requirements`, then `showdar-plan`, then `showdar-design`, then `showdar-build`, then `showdar-test`, then `showdar-review`.
### Phase 2 — execute progressively
- Load one primitive at a time; hand off only when its stop condition is met.
- Each primitive's own SKILL.md governs its stage; do not copy primitive instructions here.
- Track portable workflow state (`src/workflow-state.js`): candidate stages, selected stages, active stage, completed evidence receipts, skipped stages with structured reason plus evidence plus policy, next stage or complete, status, revision.
- Checkpoint by serializing state to plain JSON; caller or harness owns persistence. No filesystem or backend store is implied.
- Interrupt explicitly to preserve completed plus skipped plus evidence state without inventing completion.
- Resume by validating the checkpoint, re-resolving current context through Phase 6G, checking workflow compatibility, then continuing or blocking with replan-required.
- Stored state never authorizes continuation; skip requires policy plus evidence, never severity or wording alone.
- Stage completion comes from primitive evidence and stop conditions; workflow completion requires every selected stage completed or validly skipped, no blockers, and required verification satisfied.
## Decision points
- Behavior defined already? Skip `showdar-requirements`.
- Change surface local and low-risk? Skip `showdar-plan`.
- No architecture, UX, or interface trade-off? Skip `showdar-design`.
- Auth, secrets, or exposure touched? Add `showdar-security` as an orthogonal specialist.
- Deployment requested? Require explicit authority; this workflow alone never authorizes it.
## Stack detection
- Defer to each selected primitive's own stack detection.
## Failure modes
- Running every stage as a mandatory checklist.
- Duplicating primitive instructions inside this workflow.
- Treating feature intent as deployment authority.
- Loading all primitives eagerly instead of progressively.
## Stop conditions
- Stop when the request is actually a single primitive task and hand off to that primitive.
- Stop before destructive, irreversible, production, credential, publishing, or deployment actions unless explicitly authorized.
- Stop when required evidence is missing.
- Stop when the selected stages are complete and verified.
## Escalation conditions
- Ask for missing behavior definition when requirements cannot be skipped honestly.
- Ask for explicit authority when deployment or production mutation appears.
- Escalate suspected security exposure with evidence, without exploit amplification.
## Verification
- Every implementation stage ends with `showdar-test` evidence and `showdar-review` findings addressed.
- State what was executed and what remains unverified.
## Output contract
- Selected stages with one-line justification for each skipped stage.
- Completed evidence per stage.
- Verification gaps or residual risk.
## Anti-patterns
- Fixed pipeline regardless of evidence.
- Second authority engine or second intent resolver.
- Custom autonomous agent behavior.
- Copying primitive SKILL.md content into this file.
## Example
**Add workspace member search**
- Evidence: behavior already defined in the ticket, local API plus UI change, no architecture trade-off.
- Selected: `showdar-understand`, then `showdar-build`, then `showdar-test`, then `showdar-review`.
- Skipped: requirements (defined), plan (local), design (no UX decision).
- Verification: new search tests pass; review findings addressed.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!