Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Showdar Feature

ASecurity

Use when implementing a complete feature end-to-end, adaptively sequencing understand, requirements, plan, design, build, test, and review stages based on existing definition.

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
1 views
Added 9/22/2026
ai-agentsrustgoapibackendsecurity

Works with

api

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/22/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add caongocquy/showdar-skills --skill showdar-feature --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Showdar Feature?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Showdar Feature
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/caongocquy-showdar-feature/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/caongocquy-showdar-feature)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: showdar-feature
description: Use when implementing a complete feature end-to-end, adaptively sequencing understand, requirements, plan, design, build, test, and review stages based on existing definition.
---

# Showdar Feature

## Purpose

- Implement a complete feature end-to-end by sequencing primitive skills.
- Select only the stages the current evidence actually requires.
- Skip defined, trivial, or decision-free stages instead of running a fixed pipeline.
- Hand work to one primitive at a time; load the next primitive only when needed.

## When to use

- The user asks to implement a complete feature or change spanning multiple lifecycle stages.
- Whole-task intent exists: discovery plus definition plus implementation plus verification.
- Examples: "add user search", "implement checkout flow", "build the export feature".

## When not to use

- Single primitive intent stays primitive: "review this diff" stays `showdar-review`, "run tests" stays `showdar-test`, "why does this crash" stays `showdar-debug` unless the user asks to fix it end-to-end.
- A request that is only diagnosis, only planning, or only review is not this workflow.
- Once this workflow is active, do not spawn another parent workflow unless the request contains a genuinely separate workflow task.
- This workflow never recursively invokes itself.

## Inputs and assumptions

- User outcome in their own words.
- Current repository conventions and change surface are discoverable.
- Authority comes from the existing Phase 6G engine; this workflow consumes authority results and never mints authority.
- Candidate stages: `showdar-understand`, `showdar-requirements`, `showdar-plan`, `showdar-design`, `showdar-build`, `showdar-test`, `showdar-review`.

## Non-negotiable rules

- This workflow does not grant extra authority. Deployment requires explicit authority.
- Ops is NOT implied by feature work.
- Never skip verification merely to move faster.
- Security may load as an orthogonal primitive (`showdar-security`) when the change touches auth, secrets, trust boundaries, or exposure.
- Stop when required evidence is missing instead of guessing.

## Workflow

### Phase 1 — determine needed stages

- Start with `showdar-understand` when the repository, architecture, or impact is unfamiliar.
- Skip requirements if behavior is already sufficiently defined.
- Skip plan for genuinely focused or local work.
- Skip design when no meaningful architecture, UX, or interface decision exists.
- Small well-defined change: understand, then `showdar-build`, then `showdar-test`, then `showdar-review`.
- Undefined feature: understand, then `showdar-requirements`, then `showdar-plan`, then `showdar-build`, then `showdar-test`, then `showdar-review`.
- Architecture or UI-sensitive feature: understand, then `showdar-requirements`, then `showdar-plan`, then `showdar-design`, then `showdar-build`, then `showdar-test`, then `showdar-review`.

### Phase 2 — execute progressively

- Load one primitive at a time; hand off only when its stop condition is met.
- Each primitive's own SKILL.md governs its stage; do not copy primitive instructions here.
- Track portable workflow state (`src/workflow-state.js`): candidate stages, selected stages, active stage, completed evidence receipts, skipped stages with structured reason plus evidence plus policy, next stage or complete, status, revision.
- Checkpoint by serializing state to plain JSON; caller or harness owns persistence. No filesystem or backend store is implied.
- Interrupt explicitly to preserve completed plus skipped plus evidence state without inventing completion.
- Resume by validating the checkpoint, re-resolving current context through Phase 6G, checking workflow compatibility, then continuing or blocking with replan-required.
- Stored state never authorizes continuation; skip requires policy plus evidence, never severity or wording alone.
- Stage completion comes from primitive evidence and stop conditions; workflow completion requires every selected stage completed or validly skipped, no blockers, and required verification satisfied.

## Decision points

- Behavior defined already? Skip `showdar-requirements`.
- Change surface local and low-risk? Skip `showdar-plan`.
- No architecture, UX, or interface trade-off? Skip `showdar-design`.
- Auth, secrets, or exposure touched? Add `showdar-security` as an orthogonal specialist.
- Deployment requested? Require explicit authority; this workflow alone never authorizes it.

## Stack detection

- Defer to each selected primitive's own stack detection.

## Failure modes

- Running every stage as a mandatory checklist.
- Duplicating primitive instructions inside this workflow.
- Treating feature intent as deployment authority.
- Loading all primitives eagerly instead of progressively.

## Stop conditions

- Stop when the request is actually a single primitive task and hand off to that primitive.
- Stop before destructive, irreversible, production, credential, publishing, or deployment actions unless explicitly authorized.
- Stop when required evidence is missing.
- Stop when the selected stages are complete and verified.

## Escalation conditions

- Ask for missing behavior definition when requirements cannot be skipped honestly.
- Ask for explicit authority when deployment or production mutation appears.
- Escalate suspected security exposure with evidence, without exploit amplification.

## Verification

- Every implementation stage ends with `showdar-test` evidence and `showdar-review` findings addressed.
- State what was executed and what remains unverified.

## Output contract

- Selected stages with one-line justification for each skipped stage.
- Completed evidence per stage.
- Verification gaps or residual risk.

## Anti-patterns

- Fixed pipeline regardless of evidence.
- Second authority engine or second intent resolver.
- Custom autonomous agent behavior.
- Copying primitive SKILL.md content into this file.

## Example

**Add workspace member search**

- Evidence: behavior already defined in the ticket, local API plus UI change, no architecture trade-off.
- Selected: `showdar-understand`, then `showdar-build`, then `showdar-test`, then `showdar-review`.
- Skipped: requirements (defined), plan (local), design (no UX decision).
- Verification: new search tests pass; review findings addressed.

Attribution

caongocquycaongocquy
View sourceMore from caongocquy →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

693621 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →