Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Showdar Debug

ASecurity

Use when observed behavior fails through crashes, regressions, build failures, races, networking, memory, or performance issues.

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/22/2026
ai-agentsrustgoreactnextjsnodedockerdebugginggitdatabaseperformance

Works with

cli

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/22/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add caongocquy/showdar-skills --skill showdar-debug --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Showdar Debug?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Showdar Debug
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/caongocquy-showdar-debug/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/caongocquy-showdar-debug)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: showdar-debug
description: Use when observed behavior fails through crashes, regressions, build failures, races, networking, memory, or performance issues.
---

# Showdar Debug

## Purpose

- Find and confirm root cause before modifying production behavior.
- Turn logs, stack traces, timing, state, profiler data, and reproduction steps into falsifiable hypotheses.
- Avoid symptom patches that hide defects or create new regressions.
- End with a minimal fix and regression proof when implementation is requested.
- Read `references/hypothesis-driven-debugging.md` for experiment discipline.
- Use `data/failure-patterns.csv` as a hypothesis prompt, never as automatic diagnosis.

## When to use

- Crash, exception, wrong state, intermittent failure, regression, hang, build failure, or unexpected output.
- Performance problem such as jank, latency, memory growth, startup cost, or event-loop/thread blocking.
- Networking/auth/cache bugs where timing or retry behavior is unclear.
- A previous fix did not resolve the symptom and root cause needs re-evaluation.

## When not to use

- Root cause and fix are already proven and only implementation remains.
- The user asks only for architecture understanding or code review.
- A live production incident requires external observability tools unavailable here; use this skill to structure evidence but do not invent telemetry.
- Do not run destructive cleanup commands merely to “see if it helps”.

## Inputs and assumptions

- Exact symptom, expected behavior, environment/platform, and any available error/log/stack trace.
- Reproduction steps or a path to create a deterministic reproducer.
- Repository/build context; `scripts/collect-context.mjs` may collect read-only stack/git/runtime signals.
- Sensitive logs must be redacted before output.
- A hypothesis is not a conclusion until an experiment distinguishes it from alternatives.

## Non-negotiable rules

- Do not edit production code before collecting enough evidence to state at least one falsifiable hypothesis.
- Start from the first causal error/event, not the final cascade message.
- Change one variable per diagnostic experiment when practical.
- Preserve logs/profiler/test evidence that confirms or falsifies each hypothesis.
- Reject contradicted hypotheses instead of adding patches around them.
- Cache deletion, dependency reinstall, clean build, and reboot are experiments only when they test a cache/environment hypothesis.
- Never log or expose credentials/tokens/full sensitive payloads.
- For performance, measure a named path before claiming improvement.

## Workflow

### Phase 1 — reproduce and bound
- Write the shortest reliable reproduction, environment, expected result, and actual result.
- Determine whether failure is deterministic, timing-dependent, data-dependent, platform-specific, or release-only.
- Reduce unrelated variables without changing the failing invariant.

### Phase 2 — gather evidence
- Capture stack/error, relevant logs, request/state timeline, failing build task, profiler/thread/memory evidence as appropriate.
- Inspect recent relevant diff/version/environment changes.
- Collect context with `scripts/collect-context.mjs` when useful.

### Phase 3 — classify
- Classify into state/lifecycle, async/race, network/auth/cache, build/toolchain, memory/resource, performance/thread, persistence/data, or contract/serialization.
- Read the relevant reference file before designing experiments.

### Phase 4 — hypotheses
- List 2–4 ranked hypotheses with supporting and contradicting evidence.
- For each, define a cheap experiment and predicted result.
- Prefer experiments that distinguish multiple hypotheses at once.

### Phase 5 — experiment
- Run one controlled experiment.
- Record result and update hypothesis ranking.
- Repeat until one root cause is confirmed or evidence forces escalation.

### Phase 6 — regression proof
- Create the lowest-level automated test/scenario that fails for the confirmed defect.
- Confirm failure is due to the root cause, not fixture/test error.

### Phase 7 — minimal fix
- Patch the true owner/boundary.
- Avoid unrelated cleanup and symptom-level guards.
- Re-run regression and relevant broader verification.

### Phase 8 — close evidence loop
- For performance/memory, re-measure the original path/scenario.
- For build/platform, rebuild the actual affected target/configuration.
- Summarize evidence, root cause, fix, and verification.

## Decision points

- Intermittent? Focus on ordering, lifecycle, shared mutable state, retries, and environment timing.
- Only after incremental action? Investigate invalidation/cache/state transition.
- Only release build? Inspect optimization/minification/signing/config/runtime differences.
- Build error? Use first failing task and toolchain versions; read `references/build-failures.md`.
- Memory grows per repeated flow? Read `references/memory.md` and inspect retained ownership.
- Jank/latency? Read `references/performance.md` and classify thread/I/O/render/image/query cost.
- Auth/network? Read `references/networking.md`; distinguish transport, HTTP, session refresh, cache, and ordering.
- Async/lifecycle? Read `references/async-races.md`.
- Runtime/state/lifecycle/navigation? Start with the matching `category` row in `data/failure-patterns.csv` and collect its named signals before adding guards.
- Persistence/database/cache? Capture keys, transaction boundaries, query count, and durable state; do not use cache clearing as diagnosis.
- Native crash or platform-only failure? Capture symbolicated device logs, variant/toolchain, native boundary, and release artifact evidence.

## Stack detection

- React: `stacks/react.md` for render, state, effect, and external-system boundaries.
- React Native: `stacks/react-native.md` for JS/UI/native boundaries, lists, images, navigation.
- Flutter: `stacks/flutter.md` for Dart async, rebuild/layout, raster/UI thread, platform channels.
- Node: `stacks/node.md` for event-loop, promise/resource/stream/process boundaries.
- Next.js: `stacks/nextjs.md` for server/client/cache/hydration/build/runtime boundaries.
- iOS: `stacks/ios.md` for crash/build/signing/lifecycle differences.
- Android: `stacks/android.md` for Logcat/Gradle/variant/lifecycle/R8 differences.
- Tauri: `stacks/tauri.md` for Rust commands, webview IPC, capabilities, and bundle/runtime boundaries.
- Docker: `stacks/docker.md` for image, container, network, volume, and architecture boundaries.

## Failure modes

- Optional chaining/null guards added without explaining why value is unexpectedly absent.
- Random package/cache clean succeeds once but root cause remains unknown.
- Multiple changes per experiment make evidence uninterpretable.
- Debug logging changes timing and is mistaken for a fix.
- Mock-based test cannot reproduce the real boundary failure.
- Performance “fix” is judged by feel instead of measurement.
- Last error line is treated as root cause while earlier failure is ignored.

## Stop conditions

- Stop when the requested outcome is outside this skill and hand off to the more appropriate workflow.
- Stop before destructive, irreversible, production, credential, publishing, or deployment actions unless the user explicitly approved them.
- Stop when required evidence is unavailable and proceeding would require guessing about behavior, ownership, or safety.
- Stop when a repository instruction conflicts with this playbook; repository/user instructions win.
- Stop when root cause is confirmed by discriminating evidence and the requested fix/verification is complete.
- Stop earlier if available evidence cannot distinguish remaining hypotheses; report exactly what evidence is missing.

## Escalation conditions

- Ask for device/runtime logs or reproduction data when the failure cannot be observed from repository state.
- Escalate hardware/OS/service incidents that require unavailable telemetry instead of fabricating diagnosis.
- Escalate destructive data recovery or credential changes.
- If the problem expands into independent failures, split them and debug one causal path at a time.

## Verification

- Reproduce original symptom before fix where feasible.
- Confirm regression test/scenario fails without the causal fix and passes with it.
- Run relevant suite/typecheck/build/platform target after the narrow proof.
- Re-measure performance/memory path when that was the symptom.
- Verify diagnostic logs do not leak secrets and remove temporary noisy instrumentation unless intentionally retained.
- State any environment/platform not verified.

## Output contract

- **Symptom and reproduction**.
- **Evidence** — logs/state/timing/build/profiler facts.
- **Hypotheses tested** — prediction and result.
- **Confirmed root cause** — causal explanation, not symptom.
- **Fix** — minimal owning change.
- **Regression proof** — test/scenario.
- **Fresh verification** — commands/measurements and remaining uncertainty.

## Anti-patterns

- “Probably X” immediately followed by code edit.
- Retry/debounce/cache clear as a universal fix.
- Swallowing error to make UI/build appear healthy.
- Reinstalling everything without an environment hypothesis.
- Measuring only after the fix.
- Claiming root cause from correlation with one log line.
- Keeping multiple contradictory hypotheses alive after falsification.

## Example

Observation: query result becomes stale only after incremental sync.
- Evidence: clean index correct; bypass cache correct; cached path stale.
- Hypothesis: sync fails to invalidate affected query key.
- Experiment: instrument key/version and bypass/invalidate only that key.
- Result confirms invalidation path; add regression test that sync updates cached query result.
- Patch invalidation owner and verify broader query suite.
- See `examples/evidence-log.md`.

Attribution

caongocquycaongocquy
View sourceMore from caongocquy →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

693621 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →