Skip to content
Back to skills

Journey Submit

ASecurity

Use as the final stage of the Butterbase journey when hackathon_mode is true and journey-deploy has passed. Resolves which hackathon to submit to (asking the user when multiple are open), walks every field in the hackathon's returned field_schema with the user one at a time, then calls prep_and_submit_hackathon_entry. Writes the receipt to docs/butterbase/05-submission.md.

  • 533 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added June 1, 2026
ai-agents

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned June 1, 2026

npx -y skills add butterbase-ai/butterbase-skills --skill journey-submit --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Journey Submit?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Journey Submit
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/butterbase-ai-journey-submit/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/butterbase-ai-journey-submit)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: journey-submit
description: Use as the final stage of the Butterbase journey when hackathon_mode is true and journey-deploy has passed. Resolves which hackathon to submit to (asking the user when multiple are open), walks every field in the hackathon's returned field_schema with the user one at a time, then calls prep_and_submit_hackathon_entry. Writes the receipt to docs/butterbase/05-submission.md.
---

# Journey: Hackathon submission

Stage 5 (final) of the guided journey. Resolve the active hackathon, confirm fields, submit.

## When to use

- Dispatched by `journey` when `current_stage: submit` and `hackathon_mode: true`.
- Directly via `/butterbase-skills:submit`.
- No-op (returns with `"submit is disabled outside hackathon mode"`) if `hackathon_mode: false`.

## Preflight

If `docs/butterbase/03-preflight.md` is missing, older than 24 hours, or `00-state.md` has `app_id: null`, invoke `butterbase-skills:journey-preflight` first. Wait for it to return successfully before proceeding.

Additionally: refuse to run unless `deploy` is ticked in `00-state.md`. If it is not, tell the user to run `/butterbase-skills:journey-deploy` first.

## Inputs

- `docs/butterbase/01-idea.md` — title / tagline candidates.
- `docs/butterbase/02-plan.md` — feature list.
- `docs/butterbase/04-build-log.md` — what actually shipped.
- `docs/butterbase/00-state.md` — `app_id`, `deployed_url`.

## Procedure

### Step 1 — Prep (resolve which hackathon)

Always start with `action: "prep"`. Do **not** assume there is exactly one hackathon, and do **not** invent a field schema from prior context — the platform owns the schema and it varies per hackathon.

```jsonc
// First, ask the user: "Do you have a submission code from the organizer? (paste it, or 'no')"
// If yes, pass it. If no, omit it.
{
  "tool": "prep_and_submit_hackathon_entry",
  "arguments": {
    "action": "prep",
    "submission_code": "<optional, from user>"
  }
}
```

The response shape is:

```jsonc
{
  "matched": null | { "slug", "name", "submission_deadline", "ends_at", "field_schema": { "fields": [...] } },
  "match_reason": null | "submission_code" | "already_bound" | "single_open",
  "open_hackathons": [{ "slug", "name", "starts_at", "ends_at", "submission_deadline" }, ...],
  "next_call": { ... }   // present only when matched is non-null
}
```

Branch on the result:

| `matched` | `open_hackathons.length` | Action |
|---|---|---|
| non-null | any | Resolved — continue to Step 2 with `matched.field_schema`. Mention `match_reason` to the user ("Resolved via your submission code", "You're already a participant in X", "Only one hackathon is open: X"). |
| null | `0` | No hackathon is currently open for submissions. Tell the user, **stop**, and do not tick `submit`. |
| null | `1` | One hackathon is open but the user isn't bound and didn't supply a code. Ask: `"The only open hackathon is '<name>' (deadline <submission_deadline>). Submit to this one? If so, paste the submission_code the organizer gave you."` Re-run prep with the code. |
| null | `≥ 2` | **Multiple open hackathons — ask the user which one.** Present the list (name, slug, deadline) and ask: `"Which hackathon are you submitting to? Paste its submission_code."` Re-run prep with the code. Never guess. |

> Anti-pattern: do not re-run prep in a loop hoping it resolves — it won't until the user provides a `submission_code`. One question, then re-prep.

### Step 2 — Walk the returned field_schema with the user

`matched.field_schema.fields` is the **authoritative** list of fields for *this* hackathon. Walk every field in order. For each:

1. Show the user the field's `label` (not `key`) and `description`.
2. Propose a value drawn from journey artifacts where obvious:
   - URL-typed fields (`is_url: true` or `type: "url"`) for the deployed app → `deployed_url` from `00-state.md`.
   - Project name / title field → top candidate from `01-idea.md`.
   - Description / summary field → one-liner from `01-idea.md` + must-haves.
   - Repo URL → ask, no default.
   - Team info → ask, no default.
   - Demo video → ask, allow skip if `required: false`.
   - Anything else → ask.
3. Confirm one at a time. Do not batch. Required fields must have a non-empty value before moving on.
4. For `options`-typed fields, present the allowed choices verbatim.

Use `next_call.arguments.data` from the prep response as the literal template — it has one key per field with a placeholder string. Replace each placeholder with the confirmed value.

### Step 3 — Submit

Show the assembled `data` object back to the user verbatim and ask: `"Submit now? (yes/no)"`. On `yes`:

```jsonc
{
  "tool": "prep_and_submit_hackathon_entry",
  "arguments": {
    "action": "submit",
    "hackathon_slug": "<matched.slug from prep — REQUIRED when multiple are open>",
    "app_id": "<app_id from 00-state.md — strongly recommended, unlocks +50 scoring points>",
    "submission_code": "<same code passed to prep, if any — required on first submission>",
    "data": { /* user-confirmed values keyed by field.key */ }
  }
}
```

> Always pass `hackathon_slug = matched.slug` from prep. Without it, submit re-resolves and may target a different hackathon if more than one is open.
> Always pass `app_id` — scoring awards up to 50 points for Butterbase usage on that specific app.

### Step 4 — Receipt

Capture the response (`submission.id`, `submission.version`, `submission.updated_at`, `participant_created`) and write `docs/butterbase/05-submission.md`:

```markdown
# Submission

- submitted_at: <submission.updated_at>
- submission_id: <submission.id>
- version: <submission.version>
- hackathon_slug: <submission.hackathon_slug>
- hackathon_name: <matched.name>
- app_id: <submission.app_id>
- participant_created: <true|false>

## Fields submitted
<one bullet per field: label → value>
```

Tick `- [x] submit` in `00-state.md`, set `current_stage: done`. Print a one-line success to the user including the hackathon name and submission id.

## Outputs

- Hackathon submission via `prep_and_submit_hackathon_entry` (`action: "prep"` then `"submit"`).
- `docs/butterbase/05-submission.md`.

## Anti-patterns

- ❌ Skipping `action: "prep"` and calling `submit` directly with a hardcoded field list.
- ❌ Assuming there is exactly one open hackathon. Always check `open_hackathons` on the prep response.
- ❌ Picking a hackathon for the user when prep returns multiple — always ask.
- ❌ Inventing field keys or labels — only use what's in `matched.field_schema.fields`.
- ❌ Submitting without `hackathon_slug` from prep (can re-resolve to the wrong hackathon).
- ❌ Submitting without `app_id` when one exists (forfeits up to 50 scoring points).
- ❌ Calling submit without explicit `yes` from the user on the assembled payload.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.