Skip to content
Back to skills

Requirements Discussion

ASecurity

Use when starting a new feature or project to systematically capture user requirements through Socratic questioning. Creates a requirements document that can be used for design and implementation planning.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added June 5, 2026
businessapisecurityperformance

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned June 5, 2026

npx -y skills add Burburton/amazingteam --skill requirements-discussion --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Requirements Discussion?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Requirements Discussion
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/burburton-requirements-discussion/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/burburton-requirements-discussion)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: requirements-discussion
description: Use when starting a new feature or project to systematically capture user requirements through Socratic questioning. Creates a requirements document that can be used for design and implementation planning.
trigger: user says "对需求", "讨论需求", "requirements", or starts describing a new feature/project
---

# Requirements Discussion Skill

## Purpose

This skill helps systematically capture user requirements through structured questioning and dialogue. It ensures:
- Complete understanding of the problem space
- Clear definition of scope and constraints  
- Explicit acceptance criteria
- Alignment between user expectations and implementation

## When to Use

- Starting a new feature development
- Beginning a new project
- When requirements are unclear or ambiguous
- Before design phase to ensure completeness

## Process

### Phase 1: Context Gathering

Ask clarifying questions to understand:
1. **What** - What is the core functionality needed?
2. **Why** - What problem does this solve? Who benefits?
3. **Who** - Who are the users? What are their personas?
4. **When** - Are there time constraints or deadlines?
5. **Where** - What platforms/environments? (web, mobile, desktop)

### Phase 2: Functional Requirements

Explore functional aspects:
- Core features and capabilities
- User interactions and workflows
- Data inputs and outputs
- Integration points with existing systems
- API requirements (if applicable)

### Phase 3: Non-Functional Requirements

Discuss quality attributes:
- Performance expectations (response time, throughput)
- Scalability needs
- Security requirements
- Reliability/availability targets
- Compliance or regulatory needs

### Phase 4: Constraints and Assumptions

Identify limitations:
- Technical constraints (tech stack, legacy systems)
- Business constraints (budget, timeline, resources)
- Dependencies on other teams or systems
- Assumptions being made

### Phase 5: Acceptance Criteria

Define "done":
- Specific, measurable criteria for success
- Test scenarios that must pass
- User validation steps

## Output

Create a requirements document at `.opencode/requirements/{feature-name}.md`:

```markdown
# Requirements: {Feature Name}

**Date**: {YYYY-MM-DD}
**Status**: Draft → Approved

## 1. Overview

### Problem Statement
{Clear description of the problem being solved}

### Target Users
{User personas and their needs}

### Success Metrics
{How will we measure success?}

## 2. Functional Requirements

### Must Have (P0)
- [ ] {Critical requirement 1}
- [ ] {Critical requirement 2}

### Should Have (P1)
- [ ] {Important requirement 1}
- [ ] {Important requirement 2}

### Nice to Have (P2)
- [ ] {Desirable requirement 1}

## 3. User Stories

### Story 1: {Title}
**As a** {user type}
**I want to** {action}
**So that** {benefit}

**Acceptance Criteria:**
- {Criterion 1}
- {Criterion 2}

## 4. Non-Functional Requirements

### Performance
- {Performance requirement 1}

### Security
- {Security requirement 1}

### Reliability
- {Reliability requirement 1}

## 5. Constraints

### Technical
- {Technical constraint 1}

### Business
- {Business constraint 1}

## 6. Out of Scope

Explicitly NOT included:
- {Out of scope item 1}
- {Out of scope item 2}

## 7. Open Questions

- [ ] {Question 1}
- [ ] {Question 2}

## 8. Approval

- [ ] Requirements reviewed with user
- [ ] Acceptance criteria agreed upon
- [ ] Ready for design phase
```

## Interaction Guidelines

### DO
- Ask open-ended questions to explore the problem space
- Paraphrase requirements back to ensure understanding
- Challenge assumptions gently to uncover hidden requirements
- Prioritize requirements with the user (MoSCoW method)
- Document decisions and rationale

### DON'T
- Jump to solution/implementation details
- Make assumptions without validating
- Accept vague requirements without clarification
- Skip non-functional requirements
- Rush through the process

## Example Dialogue Flow

```
User: "我想做一个用户管理系统"

AI: "好的,让我来帮你梳理一下需求。首先,这个系统的核心目标是什么?
    是解决现有系统的什么问题,还是全新的业务需求?"

User: "我们需要管理内部员工账号"

AI: "明白了,内部员工账号管理。接下来我想了解几个维度:
    
    1. **用户规模**:大概有多少员工需要使用这个系统?
    2. **核心功能**:除了基本的增删改查,还需要哪些功能?
       比如:权限管理?部门架构?密码重置?
    3. **集成需求**:需要对接现有系统吗?比如 LDAP、企业微信、钉钉?
    4. **安全要求**:有什么特殊的合规或安全要求吗?"

[Continue questioning until requirements are complete...]

AI: "好的,根据我们的讨论,我整理了以下需求文档。请看一下是否准确:
    
    [Present structured requirements]
    
    有什么需要调整或补充的吗?"
```

## Integration with Superpowers

After requirements are captured and approved:
1. **brainstorming** skill can be triggered for design exploration
2. **writing-plans** skill creates implementation tasks
3. Requirements document serves as reference throughout development

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.