Execute all plans in a phase with wave-based parallelization
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add buildomator/buildomator --skill execute-phase --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Execute Phase?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/buildomator-execute-phase)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: execute-phase
description: Execute all plans in a phase with wave-based parallelization
argument-hint: "<phase-number> [--wave N] [--gaps-only] [--interactive] [--tdd]"
allowed-tools:
- Read
- Write
- Edit
- Glob
- Grep
- Bash
- Task
- TodoWrite
- AskUserQuestion
---
<objective>
Execute all plans in a phase using wave-based parallel execution.
Orchestrator stays lean: discover plans, analyze dependencies, group into waves, spawn subagents, collect results. Each subagent loads the full execute-plan context and handles its own plan.
Optional wave filter:
- `--wave N` executes only Wave `N` for pacing, quota management, or staged rollout
- phase verification/completion still only happens when no incomplete plans remain after the selected wave finishes
Flag handling rule: a flag is active only when its literal token appears in `$ARGUMENTS`; documented-but-absent flags are inactive.
Context budget: ~15% orchestrator, 100% fresh per subagent.
</objective>
<execution_context>
@${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/workflows/execute-phase.md
@${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/ui-brand.md
</execution_context>
<runtime_note>
**Copilot (VS Code):** Use `vscode_askquestions` wherever this workflow calls `AskUserQuestion`. They are equivalent — `vscode_askquestions` is the VS Code Copilot implementation of the same interactive question API.
</runtime_note>
<context>
Phase: $ARGUMENTS
**Available optional flags (documentation only — not automatically active):**
- `--wave N` — Execute only Wave `N` in the phase. Use when you want to pace execution or stay inside usage limits.
- `--gaps-only` — Execute only gap closure plans (plans with `gap_closure: true` in frontmatter). Use after verify-work creates fix plans.
- `--interactive` — Execute plans sequentially inline (no subagents) with user checkpoints between tasks. Lower token usage, pair-programming style. Best for small phases, bug fixes, and verification gaps.
A flag is active only if its literal token (`--wave`, `--gaps-only`, `--interactive`) is present in `$ARGUMENTS`. If none appear, run the standard full-phase execution flow with no flag-specific filtering. Do not infer a flag is active just because it is documented here.
Context files are resolved inside the workflow via `bm-sdk query init.execute-phase` and per-subagent `<files_to_read>` blocks.
</context>
<process>
Execute the execute-phase workflow from @${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/workflows/execute-phase.md end-to-end.
Preserve all workflow gates (wave execution, checkpoint handling, verification, state updates, routing).
</process>
<output_format>
When this workflow completes, emit a Next Up continuation block following the pattern in `references/continuation-format.md`:
- Show completion status (e.g., `## ✓ Phase N Complete` with plan/task tally)
- Emit a `## ▶ Next Up` heading with the next likely command
- Use **`` `/clear` then: ``** before the command
- Include a parenthetical: *(`/clear` is safe — `/bm:resume-work` restores position from `HANDOFF.json` if you change your mind)*
- Add an "Also available:" section with 1-3 alternatives where relevant
Phase boundaries are the highest-value places to clear context. Always suggest `/clear` on completion.
</output_format>
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!