Use when planning the calendar for a WSDM submission - the single annual cycle from August abstract and paper deadlines through October notification to the February conference, backward milestone planning, the September short-paper fallback, alternate entrances (demos, WSDM Cup, doctoral consortium), and coordination with sibling-venue deadlines.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wsdm-workflow --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Wsdm Workflow?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-wsdm-workflow)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: wsdm-workflow
description: Use when planning the calendar for a WSDM submission - the single annual cycle from August abstract and paper deadlines through October notification to the February conference, backward milestone planning, the September short-paper fallback, alternate entrances (demos, WSDM Cup, doctoral consortium), and coordination with sibling-venue deadlines.
---
# WSDM Workflow
Plan a WSDM campaign around the venue's defining rhythm: one deadline a year,
in August, for a conference the following February - with no rebuttal stage
between them. Missing August costs twelve months, and nothing after August can
improve the outcome. Every date below is a 2026-cycle anchor (abstract
2025-08-07, paper 2025-08-14, notification 2025-10-23, conference 2026-02-22
to 26, Boise); the 2027 edition (20th, Hong Kong, February 15-19, 2027) had
not published verified deadlines at this pack's check date - confirm them at
wsdm-conference.org/2027 before committing the plan.
## The annual clock
```text
T-26w fit decision (wsdm-topic-selection) + evidence plan
T-20w datasets locked, split manifests written, baselines running
T-12w main results stable; ablation matrix complete
T-8w full draft; adversarial read #1 -> objection inventory
T-4w artifact repo review-ready; ethics section drafted
T-1w abstract registered (bidding-quality title+abstract)
Aug T=0 paper deadline, AoE <- everything ends here
Oct ~T+10w notification <- no interaction in between
Nov+ camera-ready + ACM production (dates from acceptance email)
Feb single-track conference (talk/poster, registration, travel)
```
The unusual constraints, made explicit:
- **Front-load quality.** Venues with rebuttals let you defend a rushed
evaluation; WSDM does not. The T-8w adversarial read is the highest-leverage
meeting of the campaign - schedule it like a deadline.
- **The August-to-October silence** is planning time, not waiting time: prepare
the camera-ready artifact conversion and, in parallel, the rejection fork
(below), so either outcome executes immediately.
- **February logistics are real work**: winter travel, visas for the host
country (Hong Kong in 2027), industry disclosure approvals for the final
version - start each at notification, not in January.
## The September pressure valve
Since 2026 the series runs a short-paper track with deadlines about a month
after the long-paper deadline (2026 anchor: announced September 11/18, with
registry evidence of an extension to September 18/25 - verify the current
year's dates directly). Plan uses:
- A long paper that is honestly two results and a wish can be split in July:
the strong, focused result targets the short track; the broader project waits
a year and arrives with more evidence.
- A near-miss at the long deadline (evaluation incomplete) degrades gracefully
to the short track instead of slipping twelve months.
- Do not treat "short" as "unfinished": the 2026 call asked for solid,
empirically validated contributions, capped submissions at 10 per author,
and desk-rejected placeholder abstracts.
## Alternate entrances to the same room
| Entrance | Typical timing (verify per edition) | What it earns |
|---|---|---|
| Long paper | August deadline | Archival full paper + single-track talk |
| Short paper | ~September deadline (since 2026) | Archival concise paper |
| Demonstration | Autumn deadline; 4-page cap in 2026 | Archival demo paper + demo floor |
| WSDM Cup | Task-specific autumn schedule | Challenge standing + workshop-style exposure |
| Doctoral consortium | Autumn deadline | Mentoring + community entry for PhD students |
| Industry Day talk | CFP per edition (2026 theme: LLMs and agentic AI in industry) | Non-archival visibility with the practitioner half of the venue |
A lab shipping a system can rationally take two entrances in one year (e.g.,
short paper + demo) - check the current calls' dual-submission language first.
## Coordinating with the sibling calendar
WSDM's August deadline sits inside a lattice of neighbors (all timings
approximate and cycle-volatile - verify each): SIGIR around January/February,
TheWebConf around October, CIKM around May, RecSys in spring, KDD's two cycles
around August and February. Two standard plays:
- **Forward chain:** a paper rejected from SIGIR (decisions in spring) has a
natural summer revision window before WSDM's August deadline - the reviews
arrive in time to act on them.
- **Backward chain:** a WSDM rejection in October reaches SIGIR or KDD Cycle 2
in winter with fixes applied. Map the chain *before* submitting, so the
October decision triggers execution instead of deliberation.
Never dual-submit along the chain: these are archival venues with standard
concurrent-submission prohibitions; the chain is sequential by definition.
## Contingencies
- **Deadline extension announced:** treat extra days as validation time, not
new-experiment time; late-added results are the least-reviewed and
most-attacked parts of a paper at a no-rebuttal venue.
- **A competing preprint appears in July:** do not race it with rushed
experiments. Add the contrast citation, sharpen the delta sentence, and let
the August version be correct rather than first-and-fragile.
- **Key experiment breaks at T-2w:** invoke the valve - descope the claim to
what stands, or pivot to the short track - rather than shipping a table you
cannot defend to reviewers you cannot answer.
- **Chair announcement contradicts the CFP:** newest official instruction
wins; log both with dates (precedence order in
`../../resources/external_tools.md`).
## Team operating rules
1. One owner for the EasyChair record: account, abstract text, author order,
conflicts, final PDF upload.
2. The objection inventory (started at T-8w) is a living document with named
owners per objection; unresolved rows at T-1w force claim reductions.
3. The artifact repo freezes at T-1w except README fixes - late code churn
breaks the numbers-match-paper invariant more often than it helps.
4. Log every date-fact with its source URL the day you verify it; August
deadline drift (extensions happen) is checked weekly in the final month
against the official site, not social media.
## Output format
```text
[Cycle] target edition + verified deadlines (source + check date)
[Milestones] T-26w..T-0 with owners; current slack per milestone
[Valve decision] long / long+short split / short / defer, with reason
[Alternate entrances] pursued this year: <list or none>
[Chain map] pre-WSDM source venue / post-WSDM destination, with dates
[Logistics] visa / registration / disclosure lead items and start dates
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!