Use when deciding whether a project fits World Politics and whether it should be a research article or a review article. World Politics is a comparative-politics + international-relations specialist, so the test is a substantive question that travels across cases or systems — not subfield novelty, and not a single-case description. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.
Scanned 6/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wp-topic-selection --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Wp Topic Selection?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-wp-topic-selection)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: wp-topic-selection
description: Use when deciding whether a project fits World Politics and whether it should be a research article or a review article. World Politics is a comparative-politics + international-relations specialist, so the test is a substantive question that travels across cases or systems — not subfield novelty, and not a single-case description. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.
---
# Topic Selection & Fit (wp-topic-selection)
World Politics is a **leading specialist** in comparative politics and international relations. The bar
is not "new to my country case" and not "of general interest to all of political science" — it is **a
substantive political question that travels across cases or systems** and advances theoretical debate.
Use this skill to pressure-test fit before you invest.
## When to trigger
- Choosing among possible projects or framings for a World Politics submission
- A reviewer/colleague said the paper feels "too case-specific" or "just one country"
- Deciding between a **research article** and a **review article**
- Worried the topic may be out of scope (policy/opinion, theory-only, historical, journalistic)
## The World Politics fit test
A strong research article usually clears all four:
1. **Comparative or IR substance.** The question concerns the central problems of **comparative
politics or international relations** — regimes, institutions, conflict, cooperation, development,
identity, political economy — not a discipline-agnostic methods demo and not pure IR theory alone.
2. **It travels.** The argument or mechanism applies **beyond a single case**: cross-national,
cross-regional, or a theoretically motivated comparison. A lone case must be a case *of* something
general (see `wp-theory-building`).
3. **Theory + original empirics.** It "poses important substantive questions, significantly advances
theoretical debates, and presents original empirical research." A finding without theoretical
payoff, or theory with no evidence, is off-fit.
4. **In scope.** Not an opinion or policy piece, not stand-alone political theory, not a historical
article, not a current-affairs/journalistic narrative — these are explicit non-fits.
## Research article vs. review article
- **Research article** — full original study (theory + empirics), **≤ 12,500 words** including notes
and references.
- **Review article** — analyzes and compares a set of **thematically related books** *and* advances
how the field should pursue future work (distinct from a book review). **Usually commissioned**;
pitch the editors before drafting (待核实 on current commissioning practice).
## Differentiation (so you target the right venue)
| If your question is… | World Politics fit |
|----------------------|--------------------|
| comparative + cross-case (regimes, conflict, development) | **strong** — core scope |
| IR with comparative leverage | **strong** — core scope |
| general-interest, any subfield | likely APSR / AJPS / JOP, not the specialist World Politics |
| single-country description, no travel | reframe for generality or target an area journal |
| pure IR theory with no empirics | reframe; World Politics wants original empirical research |
## Anti-patterns
- "It's never been studied in country X" as the whole contribution (single-case, doesn't travel)
- A method demonstration with no comparative/IR substantive payoff
- An opinion, policy, theory-only, historical, or journalistic piece (out of scope)
- Drafting an unsolicited review article without confirming the commissioning norm
## Output format
```
【Question】one sentence
【Domain】comparative politics / IR / both
【Travels across cases?】how the argument generalizes [Y/N]
【Type】research article / review article
【In scope?】not opinion/policy/theory-only/historical/journalistic [Y/N]
【Fit verdict】strong / needs reframing / off-fit (why)
【Next】wp-literature-positioning
```
## Supplementary resources
- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — comparative + IR data sources
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — World Politics scope and article types
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!