The Journal Of Aesthetics And Art Criticism

---
name: the-journal-of-aesthetics-and-art-criticism
description: Use when targeting The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism or deciding whether an aesthetics manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, its philosophical-argument bar, objection-handling and arts-criticism expectations, house style and review norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
---

# The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism (the-journal-of-aesthetics-and-art-criticism)

## Journal positioning

The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, published for the American Society for
Aesthetics, is a leading venue for philosophical aesthetics and the criticism of the arts.
It publishes work on the nature of art, aesthetic experience and value, and the philosophy of
the particular arts — visual art, music, literature, film, dance, architecture, and beyond —
across analytic and continental approaches. Its defining expectation is a **rigorous
philosophical argument** about art or the aesthetic: a clearly stated thesis, a defended line
of reasoning, and fair engagement with the strongest objections and the relevant literature.
It is distinct from `music-theory-spectrum`, whose contribution is technical music analysis,
from `the-philosophical-review`, which is general analytic philosophy without an aesthetic
center, and from `october`/`art-history`, which are art-historical and critical-theoretical
rather than philosophical: this journal foregrounds philosophical argument about art and
aesthetic experience. Appreciation, description, or art-historical narrative with no
philosophical thesis is a poor fit. This skill is a **fit / venue-selection / re-framing**
aid. It does not replace the journal's current submission guidelines. Before submitting,
re-check the live Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism author instructions.

## When to trigger

- The author names The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism for a philosophical-aesthetics or arts-criticism manuscript and wants a fit/framing check.
- An argument about art or aesthetic experience must be sharpened — thesis, structure, and objection-handling — for a philosophical-aesthetics venue.
- The author is choosing between this journal and a music-theory, general-philosophy, or art-historical venue.
- The author needs the journal's philosophical-argument bar and desk-reject heuristics.

## Scope & topic fit

- The nature and definition of art, and the ontology of artworks and performances.
- Aesthetic experience, aesthetic properties, taste, and value.
- The philosophy of the particular arts — visual art, music, literature, film, dance, theater, architecture.
- Interpretation, criticism, expression, representation, and the relation of art to ethics, knowledge, and emotion.
- Philosophical work on creativity, the everyday aesthetic, the environment, and new media, across analytic and continental idioms.

## Method & evidence bar

- The contribution is a **rigorous philosophical argument** about art or the aesthetic, with a clearly stated, original thesis and explicit stakes.
- The strongest objections and rival positions are engaged fairly and answered, not deflected; the argument earns its conclusion.
- Where the argument turns on particular works, examples are described accurately and do genuine argumentative work, not mere illustration.
- Engagement with the relevant literature in aesthetics and the philosophy of the relevant art is current and fair.
- Distinctions are drawn precisely and key terms defined; claims are proportionate to the argument.

## Structure & house style

- Scholarly article with a sustained philosophical argument; defer exact length expectations and article types to the live guide.
- Citation follows the journal's current style (typically author-date with a reference list); re-check the current style sheet on the live guide.
- The thesis and roadmap appear early; objections-and-replies are integral, not appended; technical apparatus is used only where it earns its keep.
- Double-blind review: anonymize the manuscript (self-citations and acknowledgements) per current policy.
- Where works of art are reproduced as figures, secure reproduction permissions and meet figure specifications per the journal's policy.

## Official-submission checklist

- Before giving submission-ready advice, read `../../resources/source-basis.md` and `../../resources/official-source-map.md`; start from the American Society for Aesthetics anchors (and confirm the current press on the official page), then cite the current Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism page you checked.
- Search the live site for "The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism submission guidelines" and follow the current version.
- Re-check article types, length expectations, and the abstract requirement.
- Confirm the citation/style format and anonymization for double-blind review.
- Re-check image/figure reproduction permissions and specifications where works are reproduced.
- Re-check prior-presentation/preprint, simultaneous-submission, and AI-use disclosure policies.
- If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win.

## Pre-submission self-check

- [ ] There is a single, clearly stated, original philosophical thesis about art or the aesthetic, with explicit stakes.
- [ ] The strongest objections and rival positions are engaged fairly and answered, not deflected.
- [ ] Any appeal to particular works is accurate and does genuine argumentative work.
- [ ] Engagement with the relevant aesthetics and philosophy-of-art literature is current and fair.
- [ ] Distinctions are precise and key terms defined, with claims proportionate to the argument.
- [ ] The manuscript is anonymized, follows the journal's citation style, and any figure permissions are handled.

## Common desk-reject triggers

- Appreciation, description, or art-historical narrative with no philosophical thesis.
- An argument that ignores or only gestures at the strongest objections.
- Imprecise theses, undefined key terms, or examples used merely to illustrate rather than to argue.
- Technical art analysis or art-historical interpretation in place of philosophical argument.
- Wrong venue: a general analytic-philosophy paper with no aesthetic center, or an art-historical/critical-theory essay better served elsewhere.

## Re-routing decision

- Technical analysis of music with notated examples as the contribution → `music-theory-spectrum`.
- General analytic philosophy with no specifically aesthetic center → `the-philosophical-review` / `nous` / `the-journal-of-philosophy`.
- Ethics or value theory where the aesthetic is incidental → `ethics`.
- Art-historical argument or object/image interpretation → `the-art-bulletin` or `art-history`.
- Critical-theoretical or contemporary-art intervention → `october`.

## Output format

```text
[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism
[Area/art] <aesthetics topic and the art(s) at issue>
[Thesis] <the original philosophical claim in one line>
[Argument/engagement] <does the rigor + objection-handling clear a philosophical-aesthetics bar?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <length / citation style / anonymization / figure permissions / preprint policy>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>
```