Use when preparing an accepted TACAS (ETAPS) paper for its Springer LNCS camera-ready, covering de-anonymization of a double-blind research paper, the llncs.cls format and LNCS metadata (ORCID, references, the Springer copyright/consent-to-publish form), the gold-open-access CC-BY licensing, integrating reviewer-required changes without scope creep, permanentizing artifact links, and adding earned ETAPS artifact badges to the title page.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill tacas-camera-ready --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Tacas Camera Ready?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-tacas-camera-ready)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: tacas-camera-ready
description: Use when preparing an accepted TACAS (ETAPS) paper for its Springer LNCS camera-ready, covering de-anonymization of a double-blind research paper, the llncs.cls format and LNCS metadata (ORCID, references, the Springer copyright/consent-to-publish form), the gold-open-access CC-BY licensing, integrating reviewer-required changes without scope creep, permanentizing artifact links, and adding earned ETAPS artifact badges to the title page.
---
# TACAS Camera Ready
Use this after acceptance. TACAS papers publish in **Springer LNCS** as a **gold-open-access
(CC-BY)** volume, so the camera-ready is an LNCS production step with a Springer rights form, not
just a formatting pass. Reopen the current LNCS author instructions, the acceptance email, and the
ETAPS/TACAS artifact and registration pages before advising.
## Camera-ready audit
- **De-anonymize (research papers only):** a **regular research** paper was double-blind — restore
the author block, affiliations, ORCIDs, acknowledgements, funding, and the real tool and
repository names. A **tool / case-study** paper was single-blind and already named; just confirm
correctness.
- **Apply the final LNCS format:** `llncs.cls`, within the camera-ready page allowance stated in the
acceptance letter (references and appendix handled per the current instructions).
- **Complete LNCS metadata:** title/abstract, correct author order with **ORCIDs**, references
consistent with DOIs where available, and the running head. LNCS metadata errors are harder to fix
after publication than conference ones.
- **Integrate reviewer-required changes** from the reviews and rebuttal faithfully — without
strengthening claims beyond what was evaluated (or beyond what the artifact supports).
- **Add earned badges:** if the AEC awarded **Available / Functional / Reusable**, add the badge(s)
to the **title page** per the current guidelines.
- **Permanentize the artifact:** replace any anonymized or placeholder location with a public,
licensed, **DOI-issuing** archive (Zenodo/figshare/Software Heritage), and make the paper point at
it.
- **Complete the Springer rights form:** ETAPS proceedings are gold open access under **CC-BY**;
submit the consent-to-publish / license form correctly so the paper is released open access with
copyright retained by the authors.
## De-anonymization sweep (research papers)
| Anonymized at submission | Restore at camera-ready | Watch for |
|---|---|---|
| Author block, affiliations, ORCID | Full, correctly ordered | Wrong author order breaks the DOI citation |
| Tool / system name | Real name throughout text, figures, artifact | A leftover placeholder name in a caption |
| Acknowledgements, funding | Restored | Grant numbers required by funders |
| Self-citations (third person) | Natural first-person where it aids clarity | Over-correcting and double-citing |
| Anonymized artifact link | Public DOI archive | The old anonymized URL surviving in a footnote |
(A single-blind tool/case-study paper skips this sweep — it was never anonymized.)
## LNCS production checks
```text
[Template] llncs.cls, current revision; no manual margin/font edits
[Metadata] title, abstract, authors + ORCID, running head all entered and matching the PDF
[References] complete, consistent; DOIs where available; per the reference/appendix instructions
[Figures] vector where possible; readable in print; captions self-contained
[Rights] Springer consent-to-publish / CC-BY license form completed correctly
[Badges] earned Available/Functional/Reusable badge(s) placed on the title page
[Links] every artifact / benchmark link resolves from a logged-out browser
```
## Worked example: integrating a reviewer-required fix
The reviewers required stating the timeout in the benchmark table and adding a validation note for
the soundness claim. Camera-ready move: add the timeout and machine to the table caption, add one
sentence pointing to the witness-validation script, restore the real tool name throughout (research
paper), point the artifact reference at the now-public Zenodo DOI, and add the earned Functional
badge to the title page — without expanding the claim the reviewers accepted.
## Hedged logistics
- Page allowances, metadata fields, the rights-form mechanics, badge placement, and exact
camera-ready dates change each cycle; confirm against the decision email and current LNCS/ETAPS
instructions rather than a prior year.
## Output format
```text
[Camera-ready status] ready / needs fixes / blocked
[Category] research (de-anonymize) / tool|case-study (already named)
[De-anonymization] author block / tool name / acks / links restored? yes/na
[LNCS metadata] ORCID / references / running head / rights form complete? yes/no
[Badges] earned badge(s) added to title page? yes/na
[Reviewer-change map] <required change -> final edit, no scope creep>
[Open science] anonymized/placeholder links replaced by DOI archive? yes/no
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!