End-to-end statistical writing assistant for LaTeX - draft title/abstract/keywords, expand outlines into sections, audit manuscripts, write reviewer reports and response letters, and scaffold book manuscripts.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill stat-writing --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Stat Writing?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-stat-writing)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: stat-writing
description: End-to-end statistical writing assistant for LaTeX - draft title/abstract/keywords, expand outlines into sections, audit manuscripts, write reviewer reports and response letters, and scaffold book manuscripts.
license: CC0-1.0
metadata:
author: stat-writing-one-skill
version: "3.0"
compatibility: Codex (CLI + IDE). Optional scripts require Python 3.
---
<!--
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ 本文件为开源 Skill 原始文档,收录仅供学习与研究参考 ║
║ CoPaper.AI 收集整理 | https://copaper.ai ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
来源仓库: https://github.com/fuhaoda/stats-paper-writing-agent-skills
项目名称: stats-paper-writing-agent-skills
开源协议: MIT License
收录日期: 2026-04-02
声明: 本文件版权归原作者所有。此处收录旨在为社会科学实证研究者
提供 AI Agent Skills 的集中参考。如有侵权,请联系删除。
-->
# Statistical Writing (One Skill)
This is a single "workbench" skill for statistical manuscripts written in LaTeX.
Guidance is split into focused references under `references/`. Deterministic checks live in `scripts/`. Ready-to-use templates live in `assets/`.
## Positioning: Hybrid + JDS profile
Default behavior is journal-agnostic. For Journal of Data Science (JDS), apply the JDS profile:
- Maintain strong literature positioning and explicit novelty.
- Require clean cross-referencing and cleaned BibTeX.
- Prefer vector graphics for figures in the manuscript.
- Enable line numbers for review drafts.
- Include reproducibility artifacts (code/data/supplement) when possible.
## When to use this skill
Use this skill when the user wants to:
1. Generate compliant front matter (title, abstract, keywords).
2. Expand outlines into complete sections in LaTeX.
3. Audit a manuscript for structure, style, references, and reproducibility quality.
4. Draft reviewer reports.
5. Draft point-by-point response letters.
6. Scaffold a book manuscript from a chapter plan.
## Inputs to ask for (minimal)
Prefer file paths over pasted text.
- Manuscript tasks: root TeX file (for example `main.tex`).
- Reference checks: BibTeX file(s) (for example `refs.bib`).
- Response letters: full reviewer/editor comments + revised text if available.
- Reviewer report: manuscript or extended abstract being reviewed.
- Book manuscript: chapter list, audience, tone, and desired notation style.
If details are missing, proceed with placeholders like ` odo{...}` and ask only critical questions.
## Output conventions
Unless the user requests otherwise:
- Return LaTeX-ready output.
- For audits: rank issues as HIGH/MED/LOW with concrete fixes.
- For rewrites: include revised text and short change log.
- Never invent results or citations. Use ` odo{add citation}` or ` odo{verify result}`.
## Task routing map
Open only the reference files needed for the task.
- Title: `references/10-title.md`
- Abstract: `references/11-abstract.md`
- Keywords: `references/12-keywords.md`
- Outline to section drafting: `references/60-outline-to-section.md`
- Introduction: `references/20-introduction.md`
- Data: `references/21-data.md`
- Methods: `references/22-methods.md`
- Simulation (ADEMP): `references/23-simulation.md`
- Application/Results: `references/24-application.md`
- Discussion: `references/25-discussion.md`
- Other sections: `references/30-other-sections.md`
- General style/storyline: `references/31-general-style.md`
- English pitfalls: `references/32-english.md`
- BibTeX/natbib: `references/40-bibtex-natbib.md`
- Labels/cross-references: `references/41-cross-referencing.md`
- Reviewer report: `references/50-review-report.md`
- Response to reviewers: `references/51-response-to-reviewers.md`
- Research proposal/project cycle: `references/70-project-proposal.md`
- Book manuscript workflow: `references/71-book-manuscript.md`
- Tooling/reproducibility: `references/80-tooling.md`
## Built-in assets
- Response letter (LaTeX): `assets/response-letter-template.tex`
- Reviewer report (Markdown): `assets/reviewer-report-template.md`
- Reviewer report (LaTeX): `assets/reviewer-report-template.tex`
- Generic section skeleton: `assets/section-skeleton.tex`
- Manuscript starter (LaTeX): `assets/manuscript-template.tex`
- Book manuscript starter (LaTeX): `assets/book-manuscript-template.tex`
## Optional scripts (deterministic checks)
- Manuscript checks: `python scripts/check_tex.py path/to/main.tex`
- Citation/BibTeX checks: `python scripts/check_bib.py --tex path/to/main.tex --bib path/to/refs.bib`
- Combined run: `python scripts/audit_paper.py --tex path/to/main.tex --bib path/to/refs.bib`
These checks are heuristic and do not compile LaTeX.
## Workflows
### Workflow A - Finished paper to abstract + keywords
1. Read introduction/methods/results/discussion.
2. Use `references/11-abstract.md` and `references/12-keywords.md`.
3. Draft abstract (default 6-8 sentences, acceptable 4-10, no citations, no math notation).
4. Draft 6-10 keywords, alphabetized, avoid repeating title terms.
5. Return:
- `egin{abstract}...nd{abstract}`
- `\keywords{...}` (or venue-specific command)
- short compliance checklist.
### Workflow B - Manuscript audit
1. Run `check_tex.py` (and `check_bib.py` if `.bib` exists).
2. Use `references/31-general-style.md`, `references/40-bibtex-natbib.md`, and section-specific references.
3. Return top issues ranked by severity and concrete LaTeX edits.
4. For JDS profile, explicitly call out line numbers, vector graphics, cleaned BibTeX, and reproducibility supplement readiness.
### Workflow C - Reviewer report drafting
1. Use `references/50-review-report.md`.
2. Write summary + overall assessment + numbered major/minor comments.
3. Keep tone constructive and professional.
4. If requested, output using `assets/reviewer-report-template.tex`.
### Workflow D - Response to reviewers
1. Use `references/51-response-to-reviewers.md`.
2. Structure by Editor, Associate Editor, Reviewer sections.
3. For every comment: quote, respond, quote manuscript change, add location.
4. If requested, render with `assets/response-letter-template.tex`.
### Workflow E - Outline to full section
1. Identify section type.
2. Use `references/60-outline-to-section.md` + relevant section reference.
3. Expand bullets into coherent paragraphs with transitions.
4. Use placeholders where information is missing.
### Workflow F - Book manuscript scaffolding
1. Use `references/71-book-manuscript.md`.
2. Start from `assets/book-manuscript-template.tex`.
3. Build frontmatter/mainmatter/backmatter and chapter map.
4. Keep notation generic by default; add optional custom notation block only when requested.
## Copy/paste prompt patterns
### Abstract + keywords
"Use `stat-writing`. Read `main.tex` and draft a compliant abstract (default 6-8 sentences, acceptable 4-10; no citations; no math notation) and 6-10 alphabetical keywords. Output LaTeX blocks."
### Full audit
"Use `stat-writing`. Audit `main.tex` (+ `refs.bib`). Run scripts if allowed. Return top issues with HIGH/MED/LOW and patch-ready LaTeX fixes."
### Response to reviewers
"Use `stat-writing`. Here are reviewer/editor comments. Write a point-by-point response letter with quoted manuscript revisions and locations."
### Reviewer report
"Use `stat-writing`. Draft a reviewer report with summary, overall assessment, numbered major comments, and numbered minor comments."
### Book manuscript
"Use `stat-writing`. Start a book manuscript from chapter bullets using the book template. Produce frontmatter/mainmatter/backmatter and chapter-by-chapter drafting plan."
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!