Use when sequencing a Sociological Methods & Research (SMR) manuscript from method-contribution fit through derivation and properties, Monte Carlo simulation, real-data empirical illustration, released software, ScholarOne submission, double-anonymized review, and rebuttal. Routes to the right SMR skill; does not itself draft sections.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill smr-workflow --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Smr Workflow?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-smr-workflow)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: smr-workflow
description: Use when sequencing a Sociological Methods & Research (SMR) manuscript from method-contribution fit through derivation and properties, Monte Carlo simulation, real-data empirical illustration, released software, ScholarOne submission, double-anonymized review, and rebuttal. Routes to the right SMR skill; does not itself draft sections.
---
# SMR Workflow
Use this as the router for Sociological Methods & Research (SMR), the SAGE quantitative- and
statistical-methodology flagship. SMR publishes papers that **develop, evaluate, or critically
assess** methods; a pure application with no methodological contribution is out of scope. Reopen
the live SAGE author instructions before any deadline-ready advice — review model, fees, and policy
wording can change.
## Route map
- Fit unclear, or the "method" is really just an application: use `smr-topic-selection`.
- The new estimator/design/diagnostic and what it fixes are fuzzy: use `smr-method-contribution`.
- Methods-literature placement weak or sibling-journal confusion: use `smr-literature-positioning`.
- Assumptions, identification, bias/consistency/efficiency not pinned down: use `smr-derivation-and-properties`.
- Monte Carlo design thin or competitors missing: use `smr-simulation-studies`.
- No real-data demonstration that the method matters substantively: use `smr-empirical-illustration`.
- Exhibits crowded, not self-contained, or hiding the simulation grid: use `smr-tables-figures`.
- Prose buries the contribution or violates ASA/abstract rules: use `smr-writing-style`.
- Code/package not released or not reproducible: use `smr-software-and-reproducibility`.
- Ready for ScholarOne: use `smr-submission`.
- Decision letter arrived: use `smr-rebuttal`.
## Resource loading rule
Use the resource layer when routing:
- `resources/worked-examples/01-introduction.md` for the methods-paper opening arc (problem → why
existing methods fail → the contribution → properties → simulation + illustration → software).
- `resources/exemplars/library.md` for benchmark style and **web-verified** SMR papers by method family.
- `resources/official-source-map.md` before any review-model, abstract-limit, citation-style,
data-policy, or fee claim.
Never answer a volatile submission question from memory. If the source map marks a fact 待核实, say so
and recheck the official SAGE page before advising a final submission.
## Stop conditions
Pause the route and repair before moving forward if:
- the paper has **no methodological contribution** — it applies an existing method to a new dataset;
- the analytical properties (bias, consistency, efficiency, or the conditions for validity) are asserted
but not derived or argued;
- the simulation does not include the **competing methods** an SMR reviewer would expect, or never
shows where the new method breaks;
- there is no real-data empirical illustration showing the method changes a substantive conclusion;
- no usable software/code is released — SMR readers expect to run the method.
## Stage gates keyed to the SMR pipeline
| Gate | Pass condition | Skill that repairs failure |
|---|---|---|
| Fit gate | Method contribution and the problem it solves vs. existing methods stated in one sentence each | `smr-topic-selection`, `smr-method-contribution` |
| Theory gate | Assumptions, identification, and analytical properties traceable and derived | `smr-derivation-and-properties` |
| Evidence gate | Monte Carlo with named competitors and a real-data illustration; each property has a finite-sample check | `smr-simulation-studies`, `smr-empirical-illustration` |
| Exhibit/prose gate | Exhibits self-contained; abstract ≤150 words, no parenthetical citations; ASA style | `smr-tables-figures`, `smr-writing-style` |
| Software gate | Released package/scripts reproduce the main tables, figures, and simulation | `smr-software-and-reproducibility` |
| Conformance gate | ScholarOne fields, double-anonymization, availability statement, AI disclosure verified live | `smr-submission` |
| Post-decision gate | Point-by-point response assembled; revision clock tracked | `smr-rebuttal` |
A later gate never compensates for an earlier one: polished exhibits cannot rescue a paper whose
"method" is an application, and released code cannot rescue an underived property.
## Worked routing pass
Illustrative vignette: an author arrives with a new estimator for peer effects in network panels,
strong intuition, one simulation against OLS only, no real data, and code in a private folder.
- The fit gate passes (genuine estimator), but the **theory gate fails first**: the consistency claim
rests on an unstated network-sparsity condition. Route to `smr-derivation-and-properties`.
- The **evidence gate fails next**: the Monte Carlo compares only to naive OLS, not to the standard
network-autocorrelation and instrumental approaches a reviewer expects, and there is no real-data
illustration. Route to `smr-simulation-studies`, then `smr-empirical-illustration`.
- The **software gate** is deferred but flagged: the package must be public and reproduce the grid
before submission. Route to `smr-software-and-reproducibility` once results stabilize.
- Conformance items (ScholarOne, anonymization, availability statement) wait until the science gates
close.
Ordering principle: secure properties before evidence, evidence before exhibits, and software before
portal mechanics.
## Venue facts that gate every route
Keep these SMR constants loaded while routing, reverifying volatile ones on live pages:
- A **SAGE** journal; the quantitative/statistical-methodology flagship in sociology — distinct from
*Sociological Methodology* (ASA annual), *Psychological Methods* (APA), and *Political Analysis*.
- Submission via **ScholarOne Manuscripts**; **double-anonymized** review (separate title page).
- **ASA** in-text and reference style; **DataCite** for dataset references; abstract **≤150 words with
no parenthetical citations** (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准).
- A **data-and-code availability statement** is required, with code/materials in a trusted repository;
a **generative-AI disclosure** in the back matter when AI tools were used.
- No submission fee; Sage Choice open access is a paid option (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准).
## Output format
```text
[Current stage] idea / theory / simulation / illustration / drafting / software / submission / review / R&R / accepted
[Next SMR skill] <skill name>
[Main bottleneck] <fit, properties, simulation, illustration, exhibits, software, conformance, or response>
[Anonymization risk] <any text that would deanonymize under double-anonymized review>
[Next action] <single concrete task>
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!