Use when auditing an ACM SIGGRAPH / SIGGRAPH Asia Technical Papers submission for Linklings readiness, covering the two-step form-then-upload deadline, the acmart (>=2.16) format and the 7-page conference-track budget, the dual-track vs Journal-only choice, the mandatory representative image and supplemental video, and desk-risk triage before the UTC cutoff.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill siggraph-submission --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Siggraph Submission?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-siggraph-submission)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: siggraph-submission
description: Use when auditing an ACM SIGGRAPH / SIGGRAPH Asia Technical Papers submission for Linklings readiness, covering the two-step form-then-upload deadline, the acmart (>=2.16) format and the 7-page conference-track budget, the dual-track vs Journal-only choice, the mandatory representative image and supplemental video, and desk-risk triage before the UTC cutoff.
---
# SIGGRAPH Submission
Run this audit before you finalize on the SIGGRAPH **Linklings** site. A SIGGRAPH Technical
Paper is a **journal article in ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)** that also earns a
conference presentation slot, so the package is judged to a journal bar while moving on a
conference clock. Every number below was read from the SIGGRAPH 2026 technical-papers call and
submissions FAQ on 2026-07-09 via search renderings (see
`resources/official-source-map.md`); treat them as a one-cycle snapshot and reopen the live call
first. Note SIGGRAPH runs **two cycles a year** — SIGGRAPH North America (deadline ~January) and
SIGGRAPH Asia (deadline ~May) — so confirm which one you are targeting.
## The two-step deadline
SIGGRAPH separates the **submission form** from the **paper upload**, and both are hard UTC
cutoffs, not AoE:
- **Submission form** locks title, abstract, topic areas, and the *complete* co-author list
(SIGGRAPH 2026: **15 January 2026, 22:00 UTC/GMT**). After this the author list can no longer be
edited and no new submissions can be created — a missed form deadline means no paper exists.
- **Complete submission** uploads the paper PDF (or an MD5 checksum of it) plus all supplemental
materials and resolves conflicts (SIGGRAPH 2026: **23 January 2026, 22:00 UTC/GMT**). SIGGRAPH
Asia uses a two-stage variant (abstract/registration, then full paper — 2026 Stage-2 paper
deadline 12 May, upload 13 May).
The MD5-checksum option lets you freeze the PDF at the form deadline and upload the exact bytes by
the later deadline; the checksum you register must match the file you upload.
## Format and page budget
- **ACM `acmart` class, version 2.16 or higher** — earlier template versions produce an *invalid*
submission and are a mechanical reject. This is the `acmtog` journal format lineage; it is not
IEEEtran and not the two-column conference `sigconf` you may know from other ACM venues.
- **Conference-track / dual-track page budget:** **<= 7 pages excluding references and figures-only
pages**, with **at most two figures-only pages** placed *after* the references (graphical
material and captions only — no tables or body text smuggled in). The reference list itself has
**no length limit**. Journal-track papers are held to TOG's completeness bar rather than a hard
page cap — confirm the current-cycle wording.
- Number every page and stamp your paper ID (obtained from the submission form) on each page.
## Dual-track vs Journal-only — decide before you write the last section
Every submission is either **dual-track** (eligible to be published as a Journal/TOG paper *or* a
Conference paper) or **Journal only**. Dual-track is the default for most authors: it keeps the
lighter-validation Conference outcome available for earlier-stage or riskier work rather than
forcing an all-or-nothing Journal verdict. Choose Journal-only only when a Conference-track
publication would not serve the work. The committee, not you, assigns the final track at accept
time (see `siggraph-review-process`).
## Supplemental materials — the video is not optional
SIGGRAPH evaluates *results*, and results in graphics are temporal and visual. Plan the
supplemental package as a first-class deliverable, not an afterthought:
- **Representative image** — a single still that will front the paper in the program; required.
- **Supplemental video** — the reviewers' primary evidence for animation, simulation, rendering,
and interaction claims. You must hold **permissions for every image in the paper and every frame
of the video at submission time**.
- **Code, data, and additional results** — uploaded as supplemental material; appendices go here,
not in the 7-page body.
```bash
# Mechanical pre-upload pass on the PDF and the supplemental bundle
pdfinfo paper.pdf | grep -Ei 'title|pages'
pdffonts paper.pdf | grep -i 'no' # catch un-embedded fonts (Type3/no-embed) -> production reject
ffprobe -hide_banner supplemental.mp4 2>&1 | grep -Ei 'codec|duration|resolution'
du -h supplemental/* # confirm each file is under the portal size cap
```
## Desk-risk triage
| Finding at audit time | Severity | Real fix |
|---|---|---|
| `acmart` older than v2.16 | Mechanical reject | Recompile against the current class; do not patch the .cls |
| Conference-track body over 7 pages (refs/figure-pages excluded) | Over-length reject | Cut, or move figures to the two figures-only pages; refs do not absorb body text |
| A third figures-only page, or tables/text on a figures page | Format violation | Restructure into <=2 figures-only pages, graphical content only |
| No supplemental video for a temporal/visual result | Scored against you | Produce the results video; static frames cannot show motion/interaction |
| Missing permissions for a video frame or figure | Ethics/production block | Re-shoot, replace, or clear rights before upload |
| Author list wrong after the form deadline | Uneditable | Nothing fixes this post-form-deadline — lock authors before it |
| Paper ID not on every page | Handling error | Regenerate the PDF with the ID stamped |
## Final-week order of operations
1. Freeze the body early; the argument and the results figures cannot churn in the last 48 hours.
2. Complete the **submission form** (title/abstract/topics/all co-authors) well before its earlier
deadline; register the MD5 checksum if you plan to freeze bytes.
3. Render the final results video and the representative image; verify permissions on every asset.
4. Run the mechanical PDF/video checks on the *final* files, not drafts.
5. Fill every Linklings field — topic areas that match your evidence, conflicts for every
co-author's institution and recent collaborators — a day early.
6. Re-download the uploaded PDF and video and inspect them cold to confirm they are the files you
meant.
## Reverify each cycle
- Which cycle you are in (SIGGRAPH vs SIGGRAPH Asia) and its exact UTC cutoffs.
- The required acmart revision and the current Conference-track page budget.
- Whether review is single-blind (historically yes) or anonymized this cycle — **待核实**.
- Supplemental size limits, video codec/length rules, and any generative-AI disclosure policy.
## Output format
```text
[SIGGRAPH submission status] ready / blocked / needs work
[Cycle] SIGGRAPH 20XX (Jan) / SIGGRAPH Asia 20XX (May)
[Form] title/abstract/topics/all authors locked by the earlier deadline? yes/no
[Format] acmart >=2.16? body pages (conf-track <=7)? figures-only pages <=2?
[Track] dual-track / journal-only
[Supplemental] representative image? results video? permissions cleared?
[Fix queue] <ordered, with owners and dates before the UTC cutoff>
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!