Use when interpreting Review of Finance desk screening, Screen Reports, double-blind review, top-three-finance-journal referee standards, two-round decision philosophy, Fast-Track timing, and sanctions for undisclosed resubmission or dual submission.
Scanned 6/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill rof-review-process --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Rof Review Process?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-rof-review-process)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: rof-review-process
description: Use when interpreting Review of Finance desk screening, Screen Reports, double-blind review, top-three-finance-journal referee standards, two-round decision philosophy, Fast-Track timing, and sanctions for undisclosed resubmission or dual submission.
---
# Review of Finance Review Process
Use this to plan around RoF's editorial model.
## Process model
- RoF uses double-blind anonymous review under the current OUP instructions; manuscripts must
contain no author-identifying references (also scrub PDF metadata).
- Screen Reports from trusted referees and Associate Editors can inform desk-rejection
decisions before full review.
- Referees are asked to apply top-three-finance-journal standards and to separate their
comments into (1) major concerns required for publication and (2) suggestions. Read reports
through this lens: bucket (1) is what you must satisfy.
- RoF states a two-round decision philosophy: it aims to decide by the second round and will
likely ignore new round-two concerns not raised in round one and unrelated to your changes,
so round one is decisive.
- Published papers identify the accepting editor and the submission and acceptance dates; the
policy frames authors (not referees) as the owners of the paper.
- Fast-Track submissions pay a premium (EUR 900 first submission) for a 14-day decision target.
- Undisclosed resubmission of a rejected RoF paper, or simultaneous submission elsewhere,
triggers desk rejection and a two-year submission ban. Authors are also responsible for
searching and citing relevant work — lack of awareness is not a defense.
## Editorial board (as of the 1 January 2026 update — re-verify)
Managing Editor Marcin Kacperczyk (Imperial College London), with Editors including Ian
Dew-Becker, Hui Chen, Laurent Fresard, Marcus Opp, Jun Pan, Jacopo Ponticelli, David Solomon,
and Margarita Tsoutsoura, plus ~29 Associate Editors. Hui Chen and Margarita Tsoutsoura became
Editors on 1 January 2026, succeeding Xavier Giroud (stepped down end of 2025); Jun Pan's term
ends June 2026. Exact AE count is 待核实 — confirm on revfin.org/editorial-board/.
## Output format
```text
[Stage] pre-screen / review / R&R / resubmission / accepted
[Decision standard] <top-three concern>
[Round-one must-fix] <issue>
[Process risk] <dual submission, disclosure, fee, anonymity, or code>
[Next move] <specific action>
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!