Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Rof Review Process

ASecurity

Use when interpreting Review of Finance desk screening, Screen Reports, double-blind review, top-three-finance-journal referee standards, two-round decision philosophy, Fast-Track timing, and sanctions for undisclosed resubmission or dual submission.

1,052 stars
0 votes
0 copies
1 views
Added 6/6/2026
ai-agentsrust

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 6/6/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill rof-review-process --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Rof Review Process?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Rof Review Process
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/brycewang-stanford-rof-review-process/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-rof-review-process)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: rof-review-process
description: Use when interpreting Review of Finance desk screening, Screen Reports, double-blind review, top-three-finance-journal referee standards, two-round decision philosophy, Fast-Track timing, and sanctions for undisclosed resubmission or dual submission.
---

# Review of Finance Review Process

Use this to plan around RoF's editorial model.

## Process model

- RoF uses double-blind anonymous review under the current OUP instructions; manuscripts must
  contain no author-identifying references (also scrub PDF metadata).
- Screen Reports from trusted referees and Associate Editors can inform desk-rejection
  decisions before full review.
- Referees are asked to apply top-three-finance-journal standards and to separate their
  comments into (1) major concerns required for publication and (2) suggestions. Read reports
  through this lens: bucket (1) is what you must satisfy.
- RoF states a two-round decision philosophy: it aims to decide by the second round and will
  likely ignore new round-two concerns not raised in round one and unrelated to your changes,
  so round one is decisive.
- Published papers identify the accepting editor and the submission and acceptance dates; the
  policy frames authors (not referees) as the owners of the paper.
- Fast-Track submissions pay a premium (EUR 900 first submission) for a 14-day decision target.
- Undisclosed resubmission of a rejected RoF paper, or simultaneous submission elsewhere,
  triggers desk rejection and a two-year submission ban. Authors are also responsible for
  searching and citing relevant work — lack of awareness is not a defense.

## Editorial board (as of the 1 January 2026 update — re-verify)

Managing Editor Marcin Kacperczyk (Imperial College London), with Editors including Ian
Dew-Becker, Hui Chen, Laurent Fresard, Marcus Opp, Jun Pan, Jacopo Ponticelli, David Solomon,
and Margarita Tsoutsoura, plus ~29 Associate Editors. Hui Chen and Margarita Tsoutsoura became
Editors on 1 January 2026, succeeding Xavier Giroud (stepped down end of 2025); Jun Pan's term
ends June 2026. Exact AE count is 待核实 — confirm on revfin.org/editorial-board/.

## Output format

```text
[Stage] pre-screen / review / R&R / resubmission / accepted
[Decision standard] <top-three concern>
[Round-one must-fix] <issue>
[Process risk] <dual submission, disclosure, fee, anonymity, or code>
[Next move] <specific action>
```

Attribution

brycewang-stanfordbrycewang-stanford
View sourceMore from brycewang-stanford →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1066601 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

686011 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

651 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →