Checklist of empirical robustness tests for finance/economics papers
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill robustness --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Robustness?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-robustness)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: robustness
description: Checklist of empirical robustness tests for finance/economics papers
---
# Robustness Test Checklist
Systematic checklist of robustness tests for empirical research. Use this to ensure comprehensive testing before submission.
---
## Core Robustness Categories
### 1. Alternative Samples
| Test | Description | When to Use |
|------|-------------|-------------|
| Exclude outliers | Winsorize/trim at different levels (0.5%, 2%, 5%) | Always |
| Drop financial firms | Exclude SIC 6000-6999 | If not already excluded |
| Drop regulated industries | Exclude utilities, telecoms | Industry-specific effects |
| Different time periods | Split sample pre/post crisis, early/late | Results may be period-specific |
| Geographic subsamples | By region, state, country | External validity |
| Size subsamples | Small vs. large firms | Heterogeneous effects |
| Balanced panel | Require continuous observations | Survivorship concerns |
### 2. Alternative Specifications
| Test | Description | When to Use |
|------|-------------|-------------|
| Different fixed effects | Firm, industry×year, state×year | Control for unobservables |
| Additional controls | Add variables referees might suggest | Omitted variable concerns |
| Drop controls | Verify not over-controlling | Mediator concerns |
| Different clustering | Firm, industry, state, two-way | Inference robustness |
| Different standard errors | Bootstrap, Newey-West, Driscoll-Kraay | Serial/cross-sectional correlation |
| Nonlinear specifications | Quadratic terms, splines | Linearity assumption |
| Log vs. level | Transform dependent variable | Skewed distributions |
### 3. Alternative Measures
| Test | Description | When to Use |
|------|-------------|-------------|
| Alternative dependent variable | Different proxy for same concept | Measurement concerns |
| Alternative treatment measure | Continuous vs. binary, different threshold | Treatment definition |
| Alternative control measures | Different proxies for size, leverage, etc. | Standard practice |
| Scaled differently | By assets, sales, employees | Scaling choice matters |
### 4. Identification Tests
| Test | Description | When to Use |
|------|-------------|-------------|
| **Placebo/Falsification** | | |
| Placebo timing | Fake treatment 1-3 years before actual | DiD parallel trends |
| Placebo outcome | Effect on outcome that shouldn't be affected | Specificity of mechanism |
| Placebo treatment | Random assignment of treatment | Rule out spurious correlation |
| **Pre-trends** | | |
| Event study plot | Coefficient for each pre/post period | Visual parallel trends |
| Joint F-test | Test pre-period coefficients = 0 | Statistical parallel trends |
| **Endogeneity** | | |
| Instrumental variables | Find exogenous variation | Selection concerns |
| Heckman selection | Model selection explicitly | Sample selection |
| Propensity score matching | Match treated/control | Observable selection |
| Entropy balancing | Reweight to balance covariates | Covariate imbalance |
| Regression discontinuity | If threshold exists | Sharp identification |
### 5. Inference Robustness
| Test | Description | When to Use |
|------|-------------|-------------|
| Wild cluster bootstrap | Small number of clusters | <50 clusters |
| Randomization inference | Permutation-based p-values | Few treated units |
| Conley standard errors | Spatial correlation | Geographic data |
| Multiple hypothesis correction | Bonferroni, FDR | Many outcomes tested |
---
## DiD-Specific Tests
For difference-in-differences designs:
- [ ] Event study with pre-treatment coefficients
- [ ] Parallel trends test (formal)
- [ ] Bacon decomposition (staggered treatment)
- [ ] Callaway-Sant'Anna or Sun-Abraham estimator (heterogeneous treatment effects)
- [ ] Placebo treatment timing
- [ ] Vary treatment window
- [ ] Triple-difference if possible
- [ ] Exclude always-treated or never-treated
---
## IV-Specific Tests
For instrumental variables:
- [ ] First-stage F-statistic (>10, prefer >100)
- [ ] Weak instrument robust inference (Anderson-Rubin)
- [ ] Overidentification test (if multiple IVs)
- [ ] Exclusion restriction discussion
- [ ] Reduced form results
- [ ] Compare OLS vs. IV magnitudes
---
## Quick Commands
- **"robustness checklist"** - Full checklist for current paper
- **"DiD robustness"** - DiD-specific tests only
- **"what tests for [method]"** - Tests for specific identification strategy
- **"referee-proof"** - Most commonly requested tests
- **"prioritize tests"** - Rank by importance for your setting
---
## Referee-Proof Minimum
At minimum, most papers should include:
1. **Sample robustness:** Exclude outliers, alternative time periods
2. **Specification robustness:** Alternative fixed effects, controls
3. **Measurement robustness:** Alternative variable definitions
4. **Inference robustness:** Alternative clustering
5. **Identification test:** At least one placebo or pre-trend test
---
## Reporting Template
For robustness tables:
```
Table X: Robustness Tests
Panel A: Alternative Samples
(1) Baseline
(2) Exclude financial firms
(3) Exclude 2008-2009
(4) Winsorize at 5%
Panel B: Alternative Specifications
(5) Add industry×year FE
(6) Control for firm age
(7) Cluster by industry
Panel C: Alternative Measures
(8) Alternative dependent variable
(9) Continuous treatment measure
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!