Run the R code review protocol on R scripts. Checks code quality, reproducibility, domain correctness, and professional standards. Produces a report without editing files.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
Skills Directorynpx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill review-r --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Review R?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-review-r)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: review-r
description: Run the R code review protocol on R scripts. Checks code quality, reproducibility, domain correctness, and professional standards. Produces a report without editing files.
argument-hint: "[filename or 'all' or 'LectureN']"
allowed-tools: ["Read", "Grep", "Glob", "Write", "Task"]
---
# Review R Scripts
Run the comprehensive R code review protocol.
## Steps
1. **Identify scripts to review:**
- If `$ARGUMENTS` is a specific `.R` filename: review that file only
- If `$ARGUMENTS` is `LectureN`: review all R scripts matching that lecture
- If `$ARGUMENTS` is `all`: review all R scripts in `scripts/R/` and `Figures/*/`
2. **For each script, launch the `r-reviewer` agent** with instructions to:
- Follow the full protocol in the agent instructions
- Read `.claude/rules/r-code-conventions.md` for current standards
- Save report to `quality_reports/[script_name]_r_review.md`
3. **After all reviews complete**, present a summary:
- Total issues found per script
- Breakdown by severity (Critical / High / Medium / Low)
- Top 3 most critical issues
4. **IMPORTANT: Do NOT edit any R source files.**
Only produce reports. Fixes are applied after user review.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review...
Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publi...
Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API
