Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Qe Review Process

ASecurity

Use to understand and plan around the Quantitative Economics (QE) editorial timeline — desk-reject risk, external refereeing, ~4-5 month target turnaround, 12-month revise windows, the Econometrica-transfer route, and the pre-acceptance ES Data Editor check. Sets expectations; it does not draft the paper.

1,052 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 6/6/2026
ai-agentsgodocumentation

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 6/6/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill qe-review-process --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Qe Review Process?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Qe Review Process
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/brycewang-stanford-qe-review-process/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-qe-review-process)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: qe-review-process
description: Use to understand and plan around the Quantitative Economics (QE) editorial timeline — desk-reject risk, external refereeing, ~4-5 month target turnaround, 12-month revise windows, the Econometrica-transfer route, and the pre-acceptance ES Data Editor check. Sets expectations; it does not draft the paper.
---

# Review Process (qe-review-process)

## When to trigger

- You want to calibrate expectations on timeline and desk-reject risk before submitting
- You are deciding whether to use the Econometrica-transfer option
- You need to understand who decides and what gates lie between submission and acceptance
- A long silence has you wondering whether the target turnaround has elapsed

## How QE review works (verified 2026-06-01; re-confirm on ES pages)

QE runs **editor/coeditor-managed external peer review**. The handling coeditor may **desk-reject without external review** (typically within a couple of weeks); most — but not all — papers that pass desk go to **one or more outside referees**, often including an Associate Editor. The journal targets completing the review process in **about four to five months**. QE is **not double-blind**, and authors must **post the manuscript publicly during review**, so author identity is effectively open on the author side. **Revise offers are normally valid for 12 months.** Editor as of 2026: **Bernard Salanié** (2025–2029); co-Editors include Anna Mikusheva, Fabrizio Perri, Chao Fu, and Jim Hamilton (full roster 待核实).

## Gates between submission and acceptance

1. **Membership + fee gate** — at least one author must be an ES member; the submission fee (US$100 / US$50 student) is paid at submission unless transferring from Econometrica or invited (low-income-country exemption applies).
2. **Desk screen** — handling coeditor decides whether to send out; a desk reject is fast and the fee is **not refunded** when rejected without review.
3. **External refereeing** — one or more referees / an AE; the coeditor synthesizes.
4. **Revision rounds** — the coeditor's letter sets binding vs. optional points; revise offers run ~12 months.
5. **Pre-acceptance reproducibility check** — before final acceptance the **ES Data Editor** (inaugural Data Editor Joan Llull) runs reproducibility checks; raw data, code, and documentation must already be in hand (see `qe-replication-and-data-policy`).

## The Econometrica-transfer route

A paper previously rejected by *Econometrica* can be submitted to QE with the **option to transfer** the coeditor decision letter, referee reports, and cover letters directly from Econometrica. The QE process is **fully independent** of Econometrica; the transfer **waives the QE submission fee** (other publication fees still apply); the paper needs a cover letter explaining how it differs and how the prior referee comments were addressed. Use this when the Econometrica reports are constructive and the paper's fit is genuinely the empirical/quantitative QE lane.

## Checklist

- [ ] Membership and fee (or transfer/exemption) settled before submitting
- [ ] Realistic timeline noted: ~2 weeks to a desk decision; ~4–5 months to a full review
- [ ] Manuscript posted publicly (review is open on the author side)
- [ ] If transferring: prior Econometrica reports addressed in a cover letter
- [ ] Replication package assembled in advance of the pre-acceptance Data Editor check
- [ ] Revise window (~12 months) tracked if an R&R arrives

## Anti-patterns

- Assuming anonymity — QE is not double-blind and the paper is posted publicly
- Submitting without the replication package, then scrambling at the Data Editor stage
- Treating an Econometrica transfer as automatic acceptance — QE re-decides independently
- Reading too much into silence before the ~4–5 month target has passed

## Output format

```
【Stage】desk screen / out to referees / revision / pre-acceptance check
【Route】fresh submission / Econometrica transfer
【Timeline expectation】~2 wks desk; ~4-5 mo full review; ~12-mo revise window
【Open review noted】manuscript posted publicly? [Y/N]
【Data Editor readiness】package assembled? [Y/N]
【Next step】qe-submission (preflight) or qe-rebuttal (on R&R)
```

Attribution

brycewang-stanfordbrycewang-stanford
View sourceMore from brycewang-stanford →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1066601 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

686011 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

651 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →