Use when building tables and figures for a Public Administration Review (PAR) manuscript so exhibits are self-contained, accessible, and communicate effect magnitude to scholars and practitioners alike. PAR excludes tables/figures/appendices from the 8,000-word count, but exhibits still must earn their space. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill pubar-tables-figures --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Pubar Tables Figures?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-pubar-tables-figures)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: pubar-tables-figures
description: Use when building tables and figures for a Public Administration Review (PAR) manuscript so exhibits are self-contained, accessible, and communicate effect magnitude to scholars and practitioners alike. PAR excludes tables/figures/appendices from the 8,000-word count, but exhibits still must earn their space. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.
---
# Tables & Figures (pubar-tables-figures)
Exhibits are where an expert reviewer checks whether the result is real — and where a practitioner
reads the magnitude that drives your **Evidence for Practice**. At PAR the word count *excludes* tables,
figures, charts, and appendices (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准), so the constraint is clarity, not word
budget: every exhibit must communicate a magnitude with its uncertainty, fast.
## When to trigger
- Designing the main results table/figure or a key descriptive exhibit
- Deciding what belongs in the article vs. an online appendix/supplement
- A reviewer found an exhibit unclear, mislabeled, or non-self-contained
- Translating a coefficient into something a public manager can read
## Principles
1. **Self-contained.** A reader should understand each exhibit from its title, axis/column labels, and
note alone. State units, sample, N, the estimator, and what the estimate is.
2. **Figures over dense tables for effects.** Coefficient/forest plots, marginal-effects and
predicted-probability plots, event-study and RD plots communicate magnitude and uncertainty better
than a wall of coefficients. Show intervals — a practitioner needs the effect size, not stars.
3. **Accessible.** Colorblind-safe palettes; legible in grayscale; no chartjunk, no 3D, no needless
color. Reviewers and practitioner readers must parse it quickly.
4. **Main text vs. supplement.** Keep the few exhibits that carry the argument in the article; move
balance tables, full specifications, and robustness grids to the **online supplement**.
5. **Reproducible.** Each exhibit is generated by the master script; numbers match the deposited
materials exactly (TOP transparency — see `pubar-transparency-and-data`).
## PA-specific exhibits
- **Event-study plots around a reform** to show pre-trends and dynamics of an administrative change.
- **Predicted-probability / marginal-effects plots** translating a model into managerial terms
("an agency at the 75th percentile of red tape is X points less likely to…").
- Maps for cross-jurisdiction variation; network diagrams for collaborative-governance structure.
- For qualitative/mixed work: process timelines, evidence tables linking claims to sources.
## Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP)
Generate exhibits from the fitted result, not by retyping numbers. Full map:
[`execution-with-mcp`](../../../shared-resources/empirical-methods/execution-with-mcp.md). PAR is public administration — survey/observational and some experimental work; identification + clustered/multilevel inference, magnitude for practice.
- **Tables:** `etable` (multi-model) or `did_summary_to_latex` straight from the `result_id`.
- **Figures:** `plot_from_result` / `enhanced_event_study_plot` / `event_study_table` —
axis units and the SE/clustering note baked in.
- **Every note** names the estimator + clustering and states the magnitude in interpretable units.
See a full fitted-result → exhibit chain in the [JF execution walkthrough](../../../Journal-of-Finance-Skills/resources/worked-examples/02-execution-walkthrough.md).
## Anti-patterns
- Tables that require the prose to be intelligible (not self-contained)
- Reporting significance stars with no effect size or interval (practitioners can't act on it)
- Cramming every robustness check into the main text (use the supplement)
- Color-only encoding that fails in grayscale or for colorblind readers
- Exhibit numbers/values that don't match the deposited code output
## Output format
```
【Main exhibit】what it shows + why a figure/table
【Self-contained?】title + labels + note + N/units/estimator present? [Y/N]
【Magnitude legible to a manager?】effect size + interval shown? [Y/N]
【Accessible?】grayscale-legible + colorblind-safe? [Y/N]
【Article vs supplement】split decided
【Reproducible?】generated by master script, matches package? [Y/N]
【Next】pubar-writing-style
```
## Referee-pushback patterns and the PAR fix
- *"I can't read the magnitude — the table is all stars."* → Replace stars-only cells with effect sizes
and intervals; add a marginal-effects or predicted-probability plot so a practitioner sees the size.
- *"The exhibit isn't self-contained."* → Put the sample, N, units, estimator, and what the estimate is
into the title and note, so the figure stands alone without the prose.
- *"This figure fails in grayscale / for colorblind readers."* → Switch to a colorblind-safe palette and
encode with shape/linetype, not color alone; check the grayscale print.
- *"The main text is buried under robustness tables."* → Keep the few exhibits that carry the argument in
the article and move balance/robustness grids to the online supplement.
- *"Numbers don't match the deposited code."* → Regenerate every exhibit from the master script so the
printed values and the deposited materials are identical (see `pubar-transparency-and-data`).
## Calibration anchors (hedged)
- A PAR exhibit serves **two readers**: an expert checking whether the result is real, and a practitioner
reading the magnitude that drives the Evidence for Practice. Design for both.
- Because the word count **excludes** tables, figures, charts, and appendices (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准),
use the supplement freely for secondary exhibits — but keep the main argument to a few decisive ones.
- Confirm the current figure/table formatting and file-type requirements on the journal's author page;
Wiley production specs evolve.
## Supplementary resources
- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — plotting/mapping/network packages
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — word-count rule (excludes tables/figures/appendices)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!