Use as the entry point for any Psychological Bulletin manuscript. Routes to the right psychbull sub-skill based on where you are in the research-synthesis lifecycle and which synthesis type (meta-analysis, systematic review, meta-review/meta-synthesis, qualitative review) fits. Psychological Bulletin publishes syntheses, not original studies — it dispatches; it does not draft content.
Scanned 6/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill psychbull-workflow --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Psychbull Workflow?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-psychbull-workflow)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: psychbull-workflow
description: Use as the entry point for any Psychological Bulletin manuscript. Routes to the right psychbull sub-skill based on where you are in the research-synthesis lifecycle and which synthesis type (meta-analysis, systematic review, meta-review/meta-synthesis, qualitative review) fits. Psychological Bulletin publishes syntheses, not original studies — it dispatches; it does not draft content.
---
# Psychological Bulletin Workflow Router (psychbull-workflow)
The orchestrator for a Psychological Bulletin submission. Figure out the stage and the **synthesis
type**, then send the user to the matching skill. Psychological Bulletin publishes **research
syntheses — systematic reviews and meta-analyses — not original primary studies**, so the router's
first job is to confirm the project is a *synthesis of existing work*, not a new experiment or pure
theory.
## When to trigger
- Starting a new Psychological Bulletin review/meta-analysis and unsure where to begin
- Mid-project and unsure which skill applies next
- Deciding which **synthesis type** fits (meta-analysis vs. systematic vs. qualitative review)
- Returning with a decision letter (route to `psychbull-rebuttal`)
## First question: is this even a Bulletin paper, and which type?
| Situation | Synthesis type | Route to |
|-----------|----------------|----------|
| Many comparable studies with extractable effect sizes | **Meta-analysis** | full pipeline below |
| Large literature, appraisal needed but pooling uncertain | **Systematic review** (PRISMA) | pipeline, lighter on `meta-analysis-methods` |
| Synthesizing across prior reviews or qualitative findings | **Meta-review / meta-synthesis** | `topic-selection` + `theory-integration` |
| Database resists quantitative pooling | **Qualitative / narrative review** | `topic-selection` + `theory-integration` |
| New data / a new experiment | **Off-fit** — primary study | another APA empirical journal |
| Pure new theory | **Off-fit** | *Psychological Review* |
> If you have original data or a brand-new theory with no synthesis, stop: Psychological Bulletin is
> the wrong venue. It synthesizes what already exists.
## Routing map (stage → skill)
```text
Review-worthy / meta-analyzable? → psychbull-topic-selection
How do I find all the studies? → psychbull-literature-search-strategy
Which studies are in, and coded? → psychbull-inclusion-and-coding
How do I pool the effects? → psychbull-meta-analysis-methods
What moves the effect? Bias? → psychbull-moderators-and-bias
What does it all mean theoretically?→ psychbull-theory-integration
Are the exhibits MARS-ready? → psychbull-tables-figures
Does it read in APA 7th / MARS? → psychbull-writing-style
Protocol, data, code transparent? → psychbull-open-science-and-transparency
Ready to submit? → psychbull-submission
Got an R&R / decision? → psychbull-rebuttal
```
## Default order
`topic-selection → literature-search-strategy → inclusion-and-coding → meta-analysis-methods →
moderators-and-bias → theory-integration → tables-figures → writing-style →
open-science-and-transparency → submission → rebuttal`
Iterate: most syntheses loop search ↔ coding ↔ analysis as new studies surface. Register the protocol
(`open-science-and-transparency`) **before** screening, even though it appears late in the default order.
## Anti-patterns
- Treating Psychological Bulletin like a primary-study journal — it publishes syntheses, not new data
- Sending original theory here instead of to *Psychological Review*
- Starting analysis before a documented, reproducible search (no PRISMA trail)
- Pooling without a protocol — preregister before screening
## Output format
```
【Stage】topic / search / coding / analysis / moderators-bias / theory / exhibits / writing / transparency / submit / rebut
【Synthesis type】meta-analysis / systematic / meta-review / qualitative (or OFF-FIT → which journal)
【Route to】psychbull-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that
```
## Supplementary resources
- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — synthesis lifecycle tooling by stage
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — official Psychological Bulletin URLs behind every fact in this pack
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!