Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Psychological Science via Manuscript Central — word-format compliance, the 150-word structured abstract, APA 7th-edition style, anonymization, the Research Transparency Statement, and open data/materials with DOIs. Final checks; it does not draft content.
Scanned 6/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill psci-submission --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Psci Submission?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-psci-submission)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: psci-submission
description: Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Psychological Science via Manuscript Central — word-format compliance, the 150-word structured abstract, APA 7th-edition style, anonymization, the Research Transparency Statement, and open data/materials with DOIs. Final checks; it does not draft content.
---
# Submission Preflight (psci-submission)
The last check before submitting through **Manuscript Central** (`mc.manuscriptcentral.com/psci`).
Two things sink Psychological Science submissions most often: **busting the word format** and **missing
open-science compliance**. Verify volatile specifics (format numbers, policy wording, editor) on the
official page first.
## When to trigger
- "Submitting tomorrow" — last pass before upload
- Unsure what the format and open-science requirements demand
- Confirming the abstract, anonymization, Transparency Statement, and deposits are in order
## Process facts (verify volatile items on the official page)
- **Owner / publisher:** Association for Psychological Science (APS) / SAGE.
- **Portal:** **Manuscript Central**, `mc.manuscriptcentral.com/psci`.
- **Review:** anonymized — keep author identity out of the manuscript and repository links.
- **Word format (Research Article):** **Introduction + Discussion + Footnotes + Acknowledgments +
Appendices ≤ 2,000 words combined**; **Method + Results excluded** (typically ≤ ~2,500); ~**40
references**.
- **Abstract:** **150 words**, stating **sample sizes, participant populations, and design limitations**.
- **Style:** **APA 7th edition**; **tables/figures embedded** in the text.
- **Open science (since 1 Jan 2024):** **open data + materials required** (justified case-by-case
exemptions); **Research Transparency Statement** between Intro and Methods; **DOIs** for shared
content; preregistration reported and weighed.
- **Types:** Research Article; Registered Reports (Stage 1/2); RR with Existing Data; Commentary (≤1,000).
## Preflight checklist
### Format & abstract
- [ ] Intro + Discussion (+ footnotes/acks/appendices) **≤ 2,000 words combined**
- [ ] Method + Results readable (≤ ~2,500 words)
- [ ] Abstract **150 words**: sample sizes + populations + design limitations
- [ ] ~40 references; APA 7th edition; tables/figures **embedded** near discussion
### Anonymization (for review)
- [ ] No author names/affiliations in the manuscript
- [ ] Repository / preregistration links **anonymized** (e.g., OSF anonymized view)
- [ ] Identifying file metadata stripped
### Open science
- [ ] **Open data** deposited + DOI + data dictionary (or justified exemption)
- [ ] **Open materials** deposited + DOI
- [ ] **Analysis scripts** deposited; reproduce in a fresh session
- [ ] **Research Transparency Statement** placed between Intro and Methods
- [ ] Preregistration linked; confirmatory/exploratory split consistent
### Stats & disclosure
- [ ] Effect sizes + confidence intervals for major results
- [ ] Sample-size justification (power analysis if appropriate)
- [ ] Full disclosure of exclusions, conditions, and measures
## Anti-patterns
- Submitting over the 2,000-word combined budget
- Abstract missing sample sizes/populations/limitations or over 150 words
- Tables/figures at the end instead of embedded
- Missing or non-anonymized open-science links during masked review
- No Research Transparency Statement
## Output format
```
【Format】Intro+Discussion ≤ 2,000? Method+Results ≤ ~2,500? [Y/N]
【Abstract】150 words + sample sizes + populations + limitations? [Y/N]
【APA 7th + embedded exhibits】[Y/N]
【Anonymized】manuscript + repo/prereg links + metadata? [Y/N]
【Open science】data + materials + scripts + DOIs + Transparency Statement? [Y/N]
【Stats】effect sizes + CIs + sample-size justification + disclosure? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → psci-rebuttal on R&R
```
## Supplementary resources
- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — repositories, DOIs, `papaja`, power and effect-size tools
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — official Psychological Science URLs behind every fact in this pack
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!