Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Psci Submission

ASecurity

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Psychological Science via Manuscript Central — word-format compliance, the 150-word structured abstract, APA 7th-edition style, anonymization, the Research Transparency Statement, and open data/materials with DOIs. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1,052 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 6/6/2026
ai-agents

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 6/6/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill psci-submission --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Psci Submission?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Psci Submission
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/brycewang-stanford-psci-submission/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-psci-submission)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: psci-submission
description: Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Psychological Science via Manuscript Central — word-format compliance, the 150-word structured abstract, APA 7th-edition style, anonymization, the Research Transparency Statement, and open data/materials with DOIs. Final checks; it does not draft content.
---

# Submission Preflight (psci-submission)

The last check before submitting through **Manuscript Central** (`mc.manuscriptcentral.com/psci`).
Two things sink Psychological Science submissions most often: **busting the word format** and **missing
open-science compliance**. Verify volatile specifics (format numbers, policy wording, editor) on the
official page first.

## When to trigger

- "Submitting tomorrow" — last pass before upload
- Unsure what the format and open-science requirements demand
- Confirming the abstract, anonymization, Transparency Statement, and deposits are in order

## Process facts (verify volatile items on the official page)

- **Owner / publisher:** Association for Psychological Science (APS) / SAGE.
- **Portal:** **Manuscript Central**, `mc.manuscriptcentral.com/psci`.
- **Review:** anonymized — keep author identity out of the manuscript and repository links.
- **Word format (Research Article):** **Introduction + Discussion + Footnotes + Acknowledgments +
  Appendices ≤ 2,000 words combined**; **Method + Results excluded** (typically ≤ ~2,500); ~**40
  references**.
- **Abstract:** **150 words**, stating **sample sizes, participant populations, and design limitations**.
- **Style:** **APA 7th edition**; **tables/figures embedded** in the text.
- **Open science (since 1 Jan 2024):** **open data + materials required** (justified case-by-case
  exemptions); **Research Transparency Statement** between Intro and Methods; **DOIs** for shared
  content; preregistration reported and weighed.
- **Types:** Research Article; Registered Reports (Stage 1/2); RR with Existing Data; Commentary (≤1,000).

## Preflight checklist

### Format & abstract
- [ ] Intro + Discussion (+ footnotes/acks/appendices) **≤ 2,000 words combined**
- [ ] Method + Results readable (≤ ~2,500 words)
- [ ] Abstract **150 words**: sample sizes + populations + design limitations
- [ ] ~40 references; APA 7th edition; tables/figures **embedded** near discussion

### Anonymization (for review)
- [ ] No author names/affiliations in the manuscript
- [ ] Repository / preregistration links **anonymized** (e.g., OSF anonymized view)
- [ ] Identifying file metadata stripped

### Open science
- [ ] **Open data** deposited + DOI + data dictionary (or justified exemption)
- [ ] **Open materials** deposited + DOI
- [ ] **Analysis scripts** deposited; reproduce in a fresh session
- [ ] **Research Transparency Statement** placed between Intro and Methods
- [ ] Preregistration linked; confirmatory/exploratory split consistent

### Stats & disclosure
- [ ] Effect sizes + confidence intervals for major results
- [ ] Sample-size justification (power analysis if appropriate)
- [ ] Full disclosure of exclusions, conditions, and measures

## Anti-patterns

- Submitting over the 2,000-word combined budget
- Abstract missing sample sizes/populations/limitations or over 150 words
- Tables/figures at the end instead of embedded
- Missing or non-anonymized open-science links during masked review
- No Research Transparency Statement

## Output format

```
【Format】Intro+Discussion ≤ 2,000? Method+Results ≤ ~2,500? [Y/N]
【Abstract】150 words + sample sizes + populations + limitations? [Y/N]
【APA 7th + embedded exhibits】[Y/N]
【Anonymized】manuscript + repo/prereg links + metadata? [Y/N]
【Open science】data + materials + scripts + DOIs + Transparency Statement? [Y/N]
【Stats】effect sizes + CIs + sample-size justification + disclosure? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → psci-rebuttal on R&R
```

## Supplementary resources

- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — repositories, DOIs, `papaja`, power and effect-size tools
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — official Psychological Science URLs behind every fact in this pack

Attribution

brycewang-stanfordbrycewang-stanford
View sourceMore from brycewang-stanford →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1066601 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

693161 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

651 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →