Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Poq Topic Selection

ASecurity

Use when deciding whether a project fits Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ) and which submission type to target. POQ is the leading journal of public opinion and survey methodology, so the test is a contribution to opinion/communication theory, to current public opinion, or to survey validity — not a generic social-science finding. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.

1,052 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 6/6/2026
ai-agents

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 6/6/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill poq-topic-selection --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Poq Topic Selection?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Poq Topic Selection
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/brycewang-stanford-poq-topic-selection/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-poq-topic-selection)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: poq-topic-selection
description: Use when deciding whether a project fits Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ) and which submission type to target. POQ is the leading journal of public opinion and survey methodology, so the test is a contribution to opinion/communication theory, to current public opinion, or to survey validity — not a generic social-science finding. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.
---

# Topic Selection & Fit (poq-topic-selection)

POQ selectively publishes work in three areas: **theoretical contributions to opinion and
communication research**, **analyses of current public opinion**, and **investigations of
methodological issues involved in survey validity**. The bar is not "uses a survey" — it is a real
contribution to **how we understand opinion or how we measure it**. Use this skill to pressure-test
fit before you invest.

## When to trigger

- Choosing among possible projects or framings for a POQ submission
- A reviewer/colleague said the paper is "just another survey analysis" with no methods or opinion payoff
- Deciding among **Original Article**, **Research Note**, **Polls in Context**, and **Research Synthesis**
- Unsure whether the contribution is substantive (opinion) or methodological (survey science)

## The POQ fit test

A strong POQ paper usually clears all four:

1. **A public-opinion or survey-methods contribution.** It advances opinion/communication theory,
   illuminates current public opinion, or improves survey validity (coverage, sampling, nonresponse,
   measurement, mode, weighting). State which.
2. **Engages survey error seriously.** The design and claims are framed in terms of **Total Survey
   Error**, not a single error source. POQ readers are survey scientists.
3. **Disclosable to AAPOR standards.** You can report exact question wording, population, sample
   design, mode and dates, **response rate per AAPOR Standard Definitions**, sample sizes/precision,
   and weighting/clustering effects (see `poq-survey-design-and-measurement`).
4. **A clean, answerable scope** sized to the type — ≤ 6,500 words (Article), < 3,000 (Note),
   ≤ 2,500 (Polls in Context).

## Contribution framing

| If the contribution is… | Frame it as… |
|-------------------------|--------------|
| Substantive opinion finding | what it changes about how we understand attitudes, behavior, or communication |
| Methodological | what survey-error source it reduces or quantifies, and for whom it generalizes |
| Trend / current opinion | why this movement matters now and how the polls support the read (Polls in Context) |
| Replication / extension | which influential finding it tests and what is newly learned (Research Note) |

## Type choice

- **Original Article** — full study, broad claim, ≤ 6,500 words of text and notes.
- **Research Note** — one crisp contribution (a single finding, a decisive replication, a focused
  methods result), < 3,000 words. Do not pad it into an Article.
- **Polls in Context** — short, timely interpretation of current poll data, ≤ 2,500 words.
- **Research Synthesis** — integrative review consolidating a literature, ≤ 6,500 words.

## Anti-patterns

- "We ran a survey on topic X" with no opinion-theory or survey-methods payoff
- A method demo with no survey-validity stakes a POQ reader would recognize
- A finding that cannot be disclosed to AAPOR standards (no wording, no response rate)
- Choosing Article length out of habit when a Research Note would land harder

## Output format

```
【Question】one sentence
【Contribution】opinion-theory / current-opinion / survey-validity (which?)
【Survey-error frame】coverage / sampling / nonresponse / measurement / mode / adjustment
【Disclosable to AAPOR standards?】[Y/N — what's missing]
【Type】Original Article / Research Note / Polls in Context / Research Synthesis
【Fit verdict】strong / needs reframing / off-fit (why)
【Next】poq-literature-positioning
```

## Supplementary resources

- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — survey data sources and methodology toolkit
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — POQ scope and submission types

Attribution

brycewang-stanfordbrycewang-stanford
View sourceMore from brycewang-stanford →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1066601 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

693161 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

651 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →