Use when defending the survey design and measurement of a Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ) manuscript through the Total Survey Error framework — coverage, sampling, nonresponse, measurement (question wording/order/scales), mode effects, and weighting. POQ is the leading survey-methodology journal and expects AAPOR-standard rigor. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.
Scanned 6/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill poq-survey-design-and-measurement --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Poq Survey Design And Measurement?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-poq-survey-design-and-measurement)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: poq-survey-design-and-measurement
description: Use when defending the survey design and measurement of a Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ) manuscript through the Total Survey Error framework — coverage, sampling, nonresponse, measurement (question wording/order/scales), mode effects, and weighting. POQ is the leading survey-methodology journal and expects AAPOR-standard rigor. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.
---
# Survey Design & Measurement (poq-survey-design-and-measurement)
This is the POQ core. Reviewers are survey scientists who will probe every link in the **Total Survey
Error (TSE)** chain. The design must credibly connect the hypotheses (`poq-theory-and-hypotheses`) to
data that measure what you claim, and you must be able to **disclose every methodological element to
AAPOR standards**. Defend each error source against the strongest alternative.
## When to trigger
- Specifying the sampling frame, questionnaire, mode, or weighting scheme
- A reviewer questioned coverage, nonresponse, question wording, mode, or representativeness
- Building the **Appendix A: Disclosure Elements** (do this here, not at the end)
- Designing a survey experiment (wording/order split-ballot, conjoint, list experiment)
## Walk the Total Survey Error chain
- **Coverage.** Frame vs. target population; who is missed (online/RDD/ABS undercoverage). State the
target population precisely.
- **Sampling.** Probability vs. nonprobability; stratification, clustering, PSUs; selection
probabilities. Nonprobability/online panels need an explicit representativeness argument.
- **Nonresponse.** Report unit and item nonresponse; the **response rate computed per AAPOR Standard
Definitions** (say RR1–RR6 and show the disposition-code calculation); assess nonresponse bias, not
just the rate.
- **Measurement.** Question wording, order, response scales, reference periods, social desirability,
acquiescence. Validate constructs; pretest (cognitive interviews, behavior coding).
- **Mode.** Single vs. mixed mode; quantify and adjust for mode effects; do not conflate a mode
artifact with a substantive change.
- **Adjustment / weighting.** Design weights, nonresponse adjustment, calibration/raking,
post-stratification (incl. MRP). Report what the weights correct for and the resulting design effect.
## AAPOR disclosure (build Appendix A now)
POQ requires you to disclose — for all data reported — or link to public documentation: **funding**;
**exact question wording**; **population under study**; **sample design**; **method and dates of
collection**; **response rate and how it was calculated** (AAPOR definitions); **sample sizes and
precision of findings**; and any **design effect due to clustering and weighting**. Assemble these in
**"Appendix A: Disclosure Elements"** as you design — see `poq-transparency-and-data-policy`.
## Survey experiments
- Split-ballot wording/order experiments: randomize, report the manipulation, isolate the measurement effect.
- Conjoint / list experiments / vignettes: pre-specify estimands; address attention checks and attrition.
- Preregister design and primary analyses; report power/MDE.
## The artifact-vs-effect test (POQ-specific)
For the headline result, write one sentence: *"If this were a survey artifact (coverage / nonresponse
/ wording / order / mode / weighting) rather than a real opinion signal, the data would look like ___;
instead they look like ___."* If you cannot, the design does not yet isolate the contribution.
## Anti-patterns
- Reporting a response rate with no AAPOR definition or calculation shown
- Treating a nonprobability online sample as representative with no argument or benchmark
- Ignoring mode effects in a mixed-mode design; conflating mode artifacts with opinion change
- Weighting the point estimate but ignoring weights/clusters in the variance (see `poq-data-analysis`)
- Leaving Appendix A disclosure until submission
## Output format
```
【Target population & frame】coverage gaps named
【Sample design】probability/nonprobability; strata/clusters/PSUs
【Nonresponse】RR definition + value + bias assessment
【Measurement】wording/order/scale + validation + pretest
【Mode】single/mixed; mode effect handled?
【Weighting】what it corrects + design effect
【Artifact ruled out】the artifact-vs-effect sentence
【Appendix A started?】[Y/N]
【Next】poq-data-analysis
```
## Supplementary resources
- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — complex-survey, weighting, measurement, and pretesting tools
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — AAPOR disclosure elements and Standard Definitions
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!