Use when building tables and figures for a Population and Development Review (PDR, Wiley / Population Council) manuscript so exhibits are self-contained, accessible, and legible to a broad demography-and-development readership. Covers distinctive demographic graphics (population pyramids, age schedules, survival curves, projection fans) and cross-country comparative exhibits. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill popdevr-tables-figures --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Popdevr Tables Figures?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-popdevr-tables-figures)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: popdevr-tables-figures
description: Use when building tables and figures for a Population and Development Review (PDR, Wiley / Population Council) manuscript so exhibits are self-contained, accessible, and legible to a broad demography-and-development readership. Covers distinctive demographic graphics (population pyramids, age schedules, survival curves, projection fans) and cross-country comparative exhibits. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.
---
# Tables & Figures (popdevr-tables-figures)
Exhibits are where an expert reader checks whether the result is real — and, at PDR, where a broad
readership grasps both the population pattern and its development meaning. A figure must carry the
population-and-development point to an economist or environmental scholar, not only a demographer. Keep
the set tight: every exhibit must earn its place and the prose should not need it explained.
## When to trigger
- Designing the main results table/figure or a key descriptive exhibit
- Deciding what belongs in the article vs. the supporting information
- A reviewer found an exhibit unclear, mislabeled, or non-self-contained
- Trimming an exhibit set that has grown past what the argument needs
## Principles
1. **Self-contained.** A reader should understand each exhibit from its title, axis/column labels, and
note alone. State the population, period, age range, source/vintage, units, and N or exposure.
2. **Carry the development point.** Title and note should make the population-and-development meaning
legible, not just the demographic quantity — a reader outside demography must see the takeaway.
3. **Use the right demographic graphic for the quantity.** Don't default to a bar chart when the data
call for an age schedule, a population pyramid, a survival curve, or a projection fan.
4. **Show uncertainty.** Confidence bands on rates, life-expectancy contributions, hazard/survival
curves, decomposition components, and projection scenarios — not bare lines or point estimates.
5. **Accessible.** Colorblind-safe palettes; legible in grayscale; no chartjunk, no 3D. Reviewers and a
broad readership must parse it quickly.
6. **Main text vs. supporting information.** Keep the few exhibits that carry the argument in the
article; move full life tables, sensitivity grids, and supplementary detail to the **supporting
information**.
7. **Reproducible.** Each exhibit is generated by the master script; numbers match the deposited
materials (see `popdevr-transparency-and-data`).
## Distinctive demographic and comparative exhibits
- **Population pyramids** for age-sex structure and its change over time (and across development levels).
- **Age schedules** of fertility (ASFR), mortality (mx/qx), and migration; tempo-adjusted curves.
- **Survival and hazard curves** (Kaplan-Meier, cumulative-incidence for competing risks).
- **Decomposition bar/stacked plots** showing component contributions that sum to the total.
- **Projection fans / scenario plots** tied to policy or development futures, with uncertainty.
- **Cross-country scatter / small-multiples** linking a population quantity to a development indicator —
with comparability caveats in the note.
- Small-multiple **maps** for spatial demographic variation.
## Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP)
Generate exhibits from the fitted result, not by retyping numbers (the usual source of
body-vs-supplement drift). Full map: [`execution-with-mcp`](../../../shared-resources/empirical-methods/execution-with-mcp.md). PDR is population studies blending quantitative and policy work; apply the chain to its empirical-causal papers.
- **Tables:** `etable` (multi-model columns) or `did_summary_to_latex` straight from the
`result_id`.
- **Figures:** `plot_from_result` / `enhanced_event_study_plot` / `event_study_table` —
axis units and the SE/clustering note baked in.
- **Every note** names the estimator + clustering and states the effect size in
interpretable units.
See a full fitted-result → exhibit chain in the [JF execution walkthrough](../../../Journal-of-Finance-Skills/resources/worked-examples/02-execution-walkthrough.md).
## Anti-patterns
- Tables that require the prose to be intelligible (not self-contained)
- A generic bar chart where an age schedule, pyramid, or projection fan would reveal the pattern
- Rates, e0 contributions, or projections plotted with no uncertainty
- A cross-country scatter read as a development effect with no comparability caveat
- Exhibit numbers/values that don't match the deposited code output
## Exhibit pass for PDR
Run this as a concrete capability pass. First lock the population process, the development/policy
linkage, the data and time scale, the selection/measurement issue, and the uncertainty; then test
whether the manuscript addresses PDR's broad audience who inspect both the population evidence and its
development meaning.
- **Primary move:** For every table or figure, state the object, sample/case base, uncertainty display,
and one sentence the exhibit proves about population *and* development for this venue.
- **Decision ledger:** return `claim / evidence / blocker / next edit` rows so the next pass can patch
the manuscript directly.
- **Sibling comparison:** compare against *Demography* and *Population Studies* (methods-forward),
*Population Research and Policy Review* (applied policy), and *Studies in Family Planning* (programs);
if a neighbor has the stronger audience claim, recommend re-routing before polishing.
- **Verification floor:** before submission-ready advice, re-open `resources/official-source-map.md` for
volatile rules and name the one unresolved fact that could change the recommendation.
## Output format
```
【Main exhibit】what it shows + which graphic + the population-and-development point
【Self-contained?】title + labels + note + population/period/source/N present? [Y/N]
【Uncertainty shown?】bands/intervals on rates/curves/components/projections? [Y/N]
【Accessible?】grayscale-legible + colorblind-safe? [Y/N]
【Article vs SI】split decided, set kept tight?
【Reproducible?】generated by master script, matches package? [Y/N]
【Next】popdevr-writing-style
```
## Supplementary resources
- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — plotting, life-table, projection, and mapping packages
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — exhibit and supporting-information expectations
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!