Use to structure a PNAS main text and hold its length — Title, Significance Statement, Abstract, Introduction, Results, Discussion, in-text Materials and Methods, references — and to choose the required Classification (Biological/Physical/Social Sciences + minor subject) and keywords at submission.
Scanned 6/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill pnas-writing --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Pnas Writing?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-pnas-writing)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: pnas-writing
description: Use to structure a PNAS main text and hold its length — Title, Significance Statement, Abstract, Introduction, Results, Discussion, in-text Materials and Methods, references — and to choose the required Classification (Biological/Physical/Social Sciences + minor subject) and keywords at submission.
---
# Main-Text Writing & Structure (pnas-writing)
## When to trigger
- The manuscript structure is unclear or out of PNAS order.
- Materials and Methods are missing, or someone wants to push them out of the main text.
- The paper is over the length budget.
- You have not chosen a **Classification** (major + minor) or keywords.
- The Results read like a lab notebook instead of an argument.
## PNAS main-text order
A PNAS research article runs, in order:
1. **Title** — declarative, specific, parseable by a non-specialist.
2. **Author list & affiliations.**
3. **Significance Statement** — ≤120 words (`pnas-significance`); submitted separately but part of the article.
4. **Abstract** — ~250-word single paragraph (`pnas-abstract`).
5. **Introduction** — the gap and why it matters broadly; end on what you found.
6. **Results** — argument-ordered (below).
7. **Discussion** — interpretation and broader significance; PNAS also permits a **combined "Results and Discussion."**
8. **Materials and Methods** — **kept in the main text** (see below).
9. **Acknowledgments, data availability, references.**
## Materials and Methods stays in-text (a key PNAS difference)
PNAS keeps a **Materials and Methods** section in the main text — unlike *Cell* or *Science* Reports, which push methods to supplements/endmatter. Provide enough method in the body to evaluate and reproduce the work; longer protocols and extended data go to **SI Appendix**. Do not strip the main-text Methods to chase a word count — move detail to SI instead.
## Length budget
- Research articles have **length limits** (commonly framed as up to ~6 journal pages, roughly on the order of ~8 figures/tables and a corresponding word/character budget). PNAS counts the **whole package** — abstract, main text, figures/tables, and references — against the page/character allowance.
- **Confirm the current word/character/page caps and the figure-table allowance in PNAS author guidelines** before finalizing; treat any number here as a working target, not a rule.
- Over-length material (extended methods, supporting figures/tables, supplementary text) → **SI Appendix**.
## Classification + keywords (required at submission)
PNAS requires a **Classification** for every research article:
- **Major category — exactly one division:** **Biological Sciences**, **Physical Sciences**, or **Social Sciences**.
- **Minor subject area:** one (sometimes a permitted second) subject within that division (e.g., Biological Sciences → Genetics; Physical Sciences → Applied Physical Sciences; Social Sciences → Economic Sciences). Pick from the PNAS list.
- **Keywords:** a short set (commonly up to ~5) for indexing.
Choose the classification that matches the **handling and review community** you want, consistent with the venue call in `pnas-fit` and the editor choice in `pnas-track`/`pnas-submission`.
## Structure as argument, not chronology
Order the Results by the **logic of the claim**, not the order experiments were run:
1. Establish the phenomenon (the headline result).
2. Rule out the obvious alternative explanations.
3. Show the mechanism / generality.
4. Demonstrate the broad implication.
Each Results paragraph: **claim sentence first**, then evidence (figure callout + numbers), then inference.
## Cross-references
- Main figures/tables: "Fig. 1", "Table 1".
- Supporting Information: "*SI Appendix*, Fig. S1 / Table S1"; datasets as "Dataset S1".
## Output format
```
【Order check】 Title / authors / Significance / Abstract / Intro / Results / Discussion / Materials and Methods / refs — gaps?
【Methods location】 in main text? yes (FIX if missing) — extended detail in SI Appendix?
【Length】 package within budget? N vs cap (confirm guidelines)
【Classification】 major (Bio/Phys/Social) + minor subject chosen? + keywords (≤~5)?
【Results order】 argument-ordered, claim-first? yes/no
【Items in main vs SI】 main: [...] / SI Appendix: [...]
【Next】 pnas-figures
```
## Anti-patterns
- **Do not** delete the main-text Materials and Methods to fit a word count — move detail to SI Appendix.
- **Do not** omit the Classification or keywords; they are required at submission.
- **Do not** structure Results chronologically when a logical order is clearer.
- **Do not** import a Science Report's "Methods-in-supplement" structure — PNAS keeps Methods in-text.
- **Do not** treat the Significance Statement or abstract as optional sections.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!