Use when turning an accepted PLDI paper into its PACMPL Issue PLDI article — de-anonymization, acmsmall journal formatting, ACM rights and open-access handling, delivering every author-response commitment, and coordinating the Zenodo artifact and June conference presentation.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill pldi-camera-ready --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Pldi Camera Ready?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-pldi-camera-ready)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: pldi-camera-ready
description: Use when turning an accepted PLDI paper into its PACMPL Issue PLDI article — de-anonymization, acmsmall journal formatting, ACM rights and open-access handling, delivering every author-response commitment, and coordinating the Zenodo artifact and June conference presentation.
---
# PLDI Camera-Ready
Since 2023, "camera-ready" at PLDI means producing a **journal article**: accepted
papers appear as PACMPL (Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages),
Issue PLDI — Vol 7 for 2023, Vol 8 for 2024, Vol 9 for 2025 (SIGPLAN blog
2022-08-08 and ACM DL, read 2026-07-08). The conference talk in June is downstream
of the article, not the other way around: the 2025 wording invited PACMPL Issue
PLDI authors to present, without requiring it. Recheck the current instructions —
the 2026 camera-ready deadline itself was not visible in accessible renderings
(待核实).
## What changes at acceptance
| Submission state | Camera-ready state |
|---|---|
| Anonymous, third-person self-citations | Real authors, ORCIDs, affiliations, acknowledgements, grants restored |
| "We will..." sentences in the response | Delivered text, tables, and proofs — reviewers may verify |
| acmsmall draft with review margins | acmsmall with ACM rights block, CCS concepts, and final metadata |
| Code on an anonymous mirror | Artifact heading to Zenodo with a DOI (see `pldi-artifact-evaluation`) |
| No fee questions | Open-access handling under ACM's model |
## Open access, concretely
PACMPL is Gold Open Access. As of the check date: the discounted author-side APC
was 400 USD, SIGPLAN covers it for authors who cannot pay, ACM Open institutions
owe nothing, and ACM became a fully open-access publisher on January 1, 2026
(dl.acm.org/journal/pacmpl, read 2026-07-08). Verify which regime applies to your
institution during the rights workflow rather than budgeting from hearsay, and
never route the fee question to a student author alone.
## The de-anonymization pass
Do this as a diff, not a rewrite:
```bash
git diff submission..camera-ready -- paper/ | grep -E '^\+' | \
grep -viE 'author|orcid|acknowledg|grant|funding|\\cite' && \
echo "WARNING: content drift beyond identity restoration"
```
Legitimate additions: author block, acknowledgements, funding, restored
first-person self-citations, and the revisions promised in the author response.
Anything else — a new claim, a quietly changed number — needs your shepherd's or
the chairs' sign-off. Fix any self-citations that were blinded into vagueness:
"prior work [12]" may now become "our earlier analysis [12] which this paper
extends," with the delta stated plainly.
## PACMPL metadata checklist
- Title and author order exactly as approved; changes after acceptance go through
the chairs, not the production form.
- ORCID for every author; ACM's workflow expects them.
- CCS concepts and keywords chosen by where compiler and PL readers will search,
not copied from the template sample.
- Citations to post-2023 SIGPLAN papers in journal form: *Proc. ACM Program.
Lang.* volume, issue (PLDI/POPL/OOPSLA/ICFP), article number — see
`pldi-related-work` for the bibliography discipline.
- Every axis label and table caption re-read at final size; the single-column
layout is unforgiving of figure text scaled for two columns.
## Coordinate the three deliverables
The article, the artifact, and the talk ship on different clocks: the article on
the production deadline, the artifact on the AE timetable (Zenodo versioning
means no artifact camera-ready deadline), and the talk in June — registration for
PLDI 2026 opened March 16, 2026. Name one owner for each clock; the classic
failure is a perfect article whose artifact DOI still points at a stale
pre-response version.
## Output format
```text
[Camera-ready status] on track / blocked
[Response commitments] delivered: n/n, with section pointers
[Identity restoration] author block / ORCID / acknowledgements / self-citations
[Open access] ACM Open covered / APC path / SIGPLAN waiver (verify current terms)
[Clocks] article: <date 待核实> | artifact: <AE timetable> | talk: <June program>
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!