Run holistic pedagogical review on lecture slides. Checks narrative arc, student prerequisites, worked examples, notation clarity, and deck pacing.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill pedagogy-review --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Pedagogy Review?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-pedagogy-review)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: pedagogy-review
description: Run holistic pedagogical review on lecture slides. Checks narrative arc, student prerequisites, worked examples, notation clarity, and deck pacing.
argument-hint: "[QMD or TEX filename]"
allowed-tools: ["Read", "Grep", "Glob", "Write", "Task"]
---
# Pedagogical Review of Lecture Slides
Perform a comprehensive pedagogical review.
## Steps
1. **Identify the file** specified in `$ARGUMENTS`
- If no argument, ask user which lecture to review
- If just a name, look in `Quarto/` or `Slides/`
2. **Launch the pedagogy-reviewer agent** with the full file path
- The agent checks 13 pedagogical patterns
- Performs deck-level analysis (narrative arc, pacing, visual rhythm, notation)
- Considers student perspective (prerequisites, objections)
3. **The agent produces a report** saved to:
`quality_reports/[FILENAME_WITHOUT_EXT]_pedagogy_report.md`
4. **Present summary to user:**
- Patterns followed vs violated (out of 13)
- Deck-level assessments
- Critical recommendations (top 3-5)
## Important Notes
- This is a **read-only review** — no files are edited
- Focuses on **pedagogy** not visual layout (use `/visual-audit` for that)
- For a combined review, use `/slide-excellence` instead
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!