Use when converting an NSDI acceptance into a published, presented paper — de-anonymizing within the same 12-page cap, meeting the final-papers deadline that also gates Community Award eligibility, designating the presenter, and landing in USENIX's open-access proceedings for the May symposium.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill nsdi-camera-ready --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Nsdi Camera Ready?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-nsdi-camera-ready)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: nsdi-camera-ready
description: Use when converting an NSDI acceptance into a published, presented paper — de-anonymizing within the same 12-page cap, meeting the final-papers deadline that also gates Community Award eligibility, designating the presenter, and landing in USENIX's open-access proceedings for the May symposium.
---
# NSDI Camera-Ready
Acceptance starts a production pipeline with several deliverables owned by different
people — the final PDF, the public artifact, the presenter designation, and the trip
to the symposium. Facts below reflect the NSDI '26/'27 pages rendered on 2026-07-08;
the '27 final-paper dates were not yet posted (待核实), so anchor every date to the
notification email and the authors' instructions it links.
## Deliverables and owners
| Deliverable | Owner to assign | Hard constraint |
|---|---|---|
| Final PDF | writing lead | same 12-page cap as submission |
| Public artifact release | artifact lead | before final-papers date for award eligibility |
| Production/copyright forms | corresponding author | per the authors' instructions |
| Presenter designation | presenting co-author | via the co-chairs' Presenter Information form |
| Travel, visa, registration | presenter | May 11-13, 2027, Providence, RI |
Assign these on notification day. Cohort timing matters here: a spring acceptance
(notified July) has months of runway before the May symposium, while a fall
acceptance (notified December) runs its production pipeline much closer to the
event — same deliverables, tighter interleaving.
## The final PDF
NSDI's cap is symmetric: **final papers, like submissions, are limited to 12 pages
including footnotes, figures, and tables**, references and appendices beyond. There
is no accepted-paper page bonus to spend, so camera-ready editing is substitution,
not addition:
- **De-anonymize:** real names, affiliations, acknowledgments, funding — all inside
the same 12 pages the anonymous version used, which usually costs a few lines;
reclaim them from prose, not from evidence.
- **Restore what blinding distorted:** research-track papers that neutralized
deployment context ("a large provider") may now name it — verify employer/legal
sign-off on every restored detail, since this step is where confidentiality
incidents happen.
- **Real links replace anonymized ones:** repository, DOI'd archive, dataset pages —
consistent with what the artifact ships (`nsdi-artifact-evaluation`).
- **Honor the revision record:** for papers accepted via one-shot revision, confirm
every change promised in the change memo survived into the final text; shipping a
final that quietly reverts a required fix betrays the reviewers who accepted on
those terms.
- Then re-verify the page count — de-anonymization and shepherd-requested edits both
nudge layout.
## One deadline, two prizes
The **final-papers deadline** carries double weight at NSDI: it is the production
cutoff, and it is the **Community Award eligibility line** — the award goes to the
best paper whose code and/or dataset is public by that date. Sequence accordingly:
1. Public release of the artifact repository/archive (with license and DOI) *before*
the final-papers date.
2. Final PDF cites those live, permanent URLs.
3. Artifact-badge evaluation proceeds on its own schedule; badge outcomes do not
retroactively fix a missed release date.
## Presenter and symposium duties
- Accepted papers **designate one co-author as presenter** via the Presenter
Information form the program co-chairs distribute. Decide early — visa timelines
for a US venue (Providence, RI for May 11-13, 2027) run months, and the presenter
should ideally be the person who can answer testbed questions.
- Registration requirements, speaker discounts, and remote-presentation options for
'27 are 待核实 — read the instructions-for-presenters page of the current edition
rather than assuming either flexibility or rigidity.
- Spring-cohort papers surface on the public accepted-papers list well before the
event; coordinate any press/blog timing with your institution against the venue's
publication schedule, not against the symposium date alone.
## Open access, and what it changes
USENIX proceedings are open access: the final PDF becomes a permanently free
download on `usenix.org`, joining a record where every prior NSDI paper is equally
free. Practical consequences:
- No paywalled-version hedging — the `usenix.org` PDF is the canonical citation
target; sync any arXiv/preprint copy to the final text or clearly mark it stale.
- The paper will be read far outside the reviewing community (operators, OSS users,
hiring committees); the abstract and figure captions carry more weight than at
paywalled venues.
- Slides and talk materials commonly join the presentation page; treat them as part
of the paper's permanent public footprint.
## Production checklist
```text
[ ] Authors/affiliations restored; ORCID/name spellings confirmed by each coauthor
[ ] Acknowledgments + funding numbers complete (grant offices care)
[ ] 12-page cap re-verified after de-anonymization
[ ] Employer/legal sign-off on restored deployment details
[ ] Revision-memo promises intact in final text
[ ] Artifact public with license + DOI before final-papers date (award clock)
[ ] All URLs in the PDF resolve and are permanent
[ ] Copyright/production forms submitted per authors' instructions
[ ] Presenter designated via the form; travel/visa started
[ ] Metadata (title/abstract) identical across HotCRP, PDF, and artifact README
```
## After the symposium
The paper's public life is just beginning: keep the artifact's pinned dependencies
buildable for at least the horizon on which one-shot-revision reviewers and
follow-up work will consult it; route errata through the venue's published
correction channel rather than silently editing preprint copies; and archive the
talk recording/slides link alongside the repository README so the three public
faces of the work — PDF, artifact, talk — reference each other.
## Output format
```text
[Deadline map] final-papers date + form dates (from notification email)
[PDF status] de-anonymized / cap verified / links live / memo honored
[Award clock] artifact public before final-papers date? y/n + date
[Presenter] designated? visa/travel risk level
[Open-access sync] preprint copies reconciled with canonical PDF
[Open items] owner -> item -> due date
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!