Use when preparing an accepted MobiSys paper for the ACM Digital Library camera-ready — de-anonymization, the ACM double-column final layout and 12-page budget, ACM rights and CCS metadata, delivering any results promised in the rebuttal, coordinating the three artifact badges, registration, and the June in-person talk and demo in Cambridge.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill mobisys-camera-ready --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Mobisys Camera Ready?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-mobisys-camera-ready)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: mobisys-camera-ready
description: Use when preparing an accepted MobiSys paper for the ACM Digital Library camera-ready — de-anonymization, the ACM double-column final layout and 12-page budget, ACM rights and CCS metadata, delivering any results promised in the rebuttal, coordinating the three artifact badges, registration, and the June in-person talk and demo in Cambridge.
---
# MobiSys Camera Ready
Use this after acceptance. Reopen the current camera-ready instructions, the ACM rights form,
the registration page, and the decision email before advising authors — dates and forms are
cycle-specific.
## Camera-ready audit
- Convert the anonymous submission to the public ACM version: author names, affiliations,
acknowledgements, funding, and de-anonymized code/data links.
- Apply the current ACM double-column template and page budget. MobiSys 2026 kept a **12-page
body including figures and tables**; references and appendices sit outside the cap — confirm
the final-version rule against the current instructions.
- Deliver every result **promised in the rebuttal**; a promised camera-ready experiment that
never appears is a credibility failure the AC may notice.
- Complete ACM rights, the CCS concepts/keywords metadata, title/abstract/author-order
metadata, and the bibliography.
- Coordinate the three artifact badges so passing badges are printed on the paper and recorded
in the ACM DL (`mobisys-artifact-evaluation`).
- Confirm registration and the June in-person obligation; MobiSys expects at least one author
to present.
## What changes between the reviewed and final version
| Element | Reviewed (anonymous) | Camera-ready (ACM) |
|---|---|---|
| Author block | Stripped | Restored with affiliations |
| Repository links | Anonymized placeholder | Public, licensed, archival |
| Screenshots / demo media | Blurred / de-identified | Restored, subject to vendor NDA |
| Rebuttal promises | Pending | Delivered in body/appendix |
| Metadata | Minimal | ACM rights + CCS concepts |
## De-anonymization sweep
- Restore the author block, acknowledgements, grants, and any contribution statements the
anonymous version stripped.
- Replace anonymized repository placeholders with the public, licensed, archival artifact and
test every link from a logged-out browser.
- Un-blur screenshots and demo media, and restore device/vendor names where they were hidden
for review — while respecting any vendor NDA on hardware details.
## ACM double-column reflow
- Switching the template from anonymous to final mode changes spacing; recheck every page
break, figure placement, and wide device-table width after the flip.
- Adding the author block, acknowledgements, and funding lines can push the body over budget;
confirm the 12 pages still hold rather than assuming.
- Keep figure, table, and section numbering identical to the reviewed version so the review and
rebuttal record remain traceable to the final text.
## Worked example: integrating a promised result
The rebuttal promised a fifth-device measurement to answer a generalization concern.
Camera-ready move: add the device to the multi-device table and one sentence of interpretation,
regenerate the figure from the artifact so numbers match, and note the device in App. A's
provenance table — without restructuring the accepted contribution.
## Camera-ready readiness
```text
Final-package checklist:
PDF: ACM double-column, 12-page body confirmed, numbering unchanged
metadata: ACM rights, CCS concepts, author order, abstract
promises: every rebuttal-promised result delivered
artifacts: badges coordinated, repo de-anonymized and archival
logistics: registration done, June presenter and demo assigned
```
## Hedged logistics
- Registration pricing, ACM rights/OA mechanics, and exact camera-ready dates change every
cycle; confirm against the decision email and current instructions.
## Output format
```text
[Camera-ready status] Ready / Needs fixes / Blocked
[Final package] <PDF/metadata/ACM rights/artifacts>
[Policy checks] <page/authors/presentation/registration/badges>
[Promise delivery] <rebuttal promise -> final edit>
[Remaining owner] <person -> task>
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!