Use when packaging a MobiSys artifact for the Artifact Evaluation Committee — choosing among the three independent ACM badges (Available, Evaluated–Functional, Results Reproduced), building the workflow scripts the single-blind AEC runs on its own machines, and providing a hardware-optional path for evaluators who lack the exact phone, wearable, or board.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill mobisys-artifact-evaluation --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Mobisys Artifact Evaluation?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-mobisys-artifact-evaluation)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: mobisys-artifact-evaluation
description: Use when packaging a MobiSys artifact for the Artifact Evaluation Committee — choosing among the three independent ACM badges (Available, Evaluated–Functional, Results Reproduced), building the workflow scripts the single-blind AEC runs on its own machines, and providing a hardware-optional path for evaluators who lack the exact phone, wearable, or board.
---
# MobiSys Artifact Evaluation
Use this for the MobiSys artifact submission. MobiSys has a strong, **script-first** artifact
culture: the single-blind AEC runs the authors' workflow scripts on the reviewers' own
systems, so an artifact that only works on your bench is not an artifact.
## The three ACM badges
Authors may seek one, two, or all three independent badges; passing badges are printed on the
paper and recorded in the ACM DL:
| Badge | What it certifies | What the AEC does |
|---|---|---|
| Artifacts Available | The artifact is publicly archived at a stable location | Checks the archival link and license |
| Artifacts Evaluated — Functional | The artifact runs and does what the paper says | Runs your workflow scripts on the AEC's machines |
| Results Reproduced | Key paper results are reproduced independently | Regenerates headline numbers/figures from your package |
Choose badges as **claim calibration**: *Available* is a release commitment; *Functional*
needs a runnable package; *Results Reproduced* needs the headline device results to come back
on machines you do not control — the hardest badge for on-device work.
## Artifact plan
- Decide what evidence supports each badge: source, build scripts, model files, workload
traces, and the measurement/plotting pipeline.
- Provide a **top-level workflow script** and a README that orients an evaluator in one minute:
environment, dependencies, one command to smoke-test, one to reproduce a headline figure,
expected outputs, and runtime.
- Anonymize repository history, paths, screenshots, notebook metadata, license headers, and
device serial numbers for the review round; de-anonymize only at camera-ready.
- Pin framework, runtime, and model checkpoint hashes; on-device results drift across
framework minor versions.
## The hardware-optional path (the MobiSys-specific move)
On-device artifacts fail *Functional* most often because the evaluator lacks the exact phone,
wearable, or board. Design for that from the start:
```text
Hardware-optional package layout:
/device full pipeline for the exact hardware (Results Reproduced target)
/emulated downscaled or emulator path an evaluator can run without the device
/logs recorded runs so plots regenerate even if nothing executes
/README states which claims each path can and cannot reproduce
```
State plainly which headline numbers the emulated path *cannot* reproduce (typically absolute
energy and thermal behavior) so the AEC grades the right badge instead of failing the whole
package.
## What AEC reviewers open first
- The README and the top-level workflow script — if these do not run cleanly, the badge stalls
regardless of how good the system is.
- The one-command smoke test — make it fast and hermetic.
- The plotting pipeline for a headline figure — emit figures directly from logged results so
the paper numbers and artifact numbers cannot drift.
## Calibration anchors
- Artifact evaluation is single-blind and separate from paper review; the badge names and the
artifact deadline are cycle-specific — verify against the current Artifact Evaluation page
rather than past years.
- Absolute on-device energy and latency are the least portable results; scope
*Results Reproduced* claims to what survives on another evaluator's hardware.
## Output format
```text
[Badges sought] Available / Functional / Results Reproduced
[Package contents] <source/scripts/models/traces/plotting>
[Hardware-optional path] present? which claims it cannot reproduce
[Anonymity risks] <paths/screenshots/serials/repo owners>
[Reproduction level] turnkey / scripted / descriptive / weak
[Fixes before upload] <ordered list>
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!