Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Mksc Workflow

ASecurity

Use when deciding which mksc-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a Marketing Science manuscript from modeling-driven topic selection through R&R rebuttal. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

1,052 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 6/5/2026
ai-agentsgo

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 6/5/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill mksc-workflow --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Mksc Workflow?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Mksc Workflow
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/brycewang-stanford-mksc-workflow/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-mksc-workflow)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: mksc-workflow
description: Use when deciding which mksc-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a Marketing Science manuscript from modeling-driven topic selection through R&R rebuttal. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
---

# Marketing Science Workflow (mksc-workflow)

## Overview

This is the router. It does not replace any specialized skill; it tells you **which mksc-* skill to use right now** for your Marketing Science manuscript.

Default assumption: unless told otherwise, the target is **Marketing Science**, the flagship quantitative-marketing journal of the INFORMS Society for Marketing Science (ISMS), published by INFORMS. Its editorial statement says it "focuses primarily on articles that answer important research questions in marketing using mathematical modeling." The dominant genres are **structural econometric models** and **analytical (game-theoretic) models**; econometrics, ML, surveys, and experiments are welcome only when they develop, test, or rigorously apply a formal model. The non-negotiable bar is therefore: an important marketing question answered through a model, not a reduced-form correlation. Senior Editors and Associate Editors (not standing departmental Area Editors) route the paper; the editor and reviewers will press equally on "does the model identify the effect?" and "what do we learn about marketing?"

> Editor-in-Chief: Puneet Manchanda (Michigan Ross), term Jan 1 2025–Dec 31 2027 (renewable through 2030), succeeding Olivier Toubia. Verify the masthead at the editorial-board page; fees and limits change.

## Routing table

| Current symptom                                                  | Next skill                   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|
| Question is vague; unsure it needs a formal model or fits MKSC   | `mksc-topic-selection`       |
| No model yet; mechanism/identification logic missing             | `mksc-theory-development`    |
| Front end ignores structural/analytical precedents               | `mksc-literature-positioning`|
| Unsure: structural vs. analytical vs. causal-ML; estimable?      | `mksc-methods`               |
| Have a model and data; estimation, fit, counterfactuals unsettled| `mksc-data-analysis`         |
| Results exist but "primary contribution dimension" is unclear    | `mksc-contribution-framing`  |
| Estimate/comparative-statics/counterfactual exhibits are weak    | `mksc-tables-figures`        |
| Notation-heavy, buries model intuition, off INFORMS style        | `mksc-writing-style`         |
| Ready to submit; need ScholarOne + blinding + replication package| `mksc-submission`            |
| Want to understand double-anonymous SE/AE review                 | `mksc-review-process`        |
| Received an R&R; need to plan and draft the response             | `mksc-rebuttal`              |

## Default order

1. `mksc-topic-selection` — lock a modeling-worthy marketing question
2. `mksc-theory-development` — build the analytical/structural model + identification
3. `mksc-literature-positioning` — engage the modeling conversation you join
4. `mksc-methods` — pick the genre and make the model estimable
5. `mksc-data-analysis` — estimate, assess fit, run counterfactuals, robustness
6. `mksc-contribution-framing` — name the primary contribution dimension
7. `mksc-tables-figures` — finalize estimate/counterfactual exhibits in INFORMS style
8. `mksc-writing-style` — front-load intuition; INFORMS author-year prose
9. `mksc-submission` — ScholarOne preflight + replication-ready package
10. `mksc-review-process` — set expectations for double-anonymous multi-round review
11. `mksc-rebuttal` — after an R&R, revise then draft the response

> Decide the **Frontiers** vs. regular-article track early: Frontiers is a strict 6,000-word total cap and rewards one dominant contribution dimension. It changes scope, not polish.

## Anti-patterns

- Jumping to `mksc-data-analysis` before a model exists — MKSC rejects model-free correlation.
- Polishing exhibits (`mksc-tables-figures`) before identification is settled.
- Treating a consumer-psychology experiment with no formal model as MKSC-ready — that is a JCR paper.

Attribution

brycewang-stanfordbrycewang-stanford
View sourceMore from brycewang-stanford →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1066601 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

686011 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

651 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →